• 1 hour Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 hours Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 hours OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 hours London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 5 hours Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 8 hours Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 14 hours India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 19 hours Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 23 hours Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 1 day Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 1 day Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 1 day Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 2 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 2 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 2 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 2 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 2 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 2 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 2 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 2 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 2 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 3 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 3 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 3 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 3 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 3 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 3 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 6 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 6 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 6 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 6 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 6 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 7 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 7 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 7 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 7 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 7 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 7 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 7 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks

Ohio Suing BP For $33.3 Million

Ohio Suing BP For $33.3 Million

Ohio is suing BP for $33.3 million, saying it “double-dipped” by taking not only state money but also reimbursement from insurers to clean up spills from the hundreds of underground fuel tanks at service stations around the state.

State Attorney General Mike DeWine joined the Ohio Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation Board to file the lawsuit on March 2. The Board was set up in 1989 to serve tank owners that lack insurance to cover the clean-up of a fuel spill.

The suit, filed in Franklin County Common Pleas Court, says BP didn’t disclose that it had insurance when it applied to the Board for compensation. As a result, it said, it received $33.3 million from the fund, even though it was also being reimbursed by its insurers.

“Our lawsuit alleges that BP knowingly and intentionally took more than $33 million that it was not eligible to accept,” DeWine said in a statement. “BP has to follow the same rules as other businesses and can’t engage in misconduct without consequence.”

Related: Oil Majors Balk At Mexican Offshore Proposals

The lawsuit demands that BP return the money and pay unspecified damages.

According to the action, BP and companies that it later acquired have received more money from the Compensation Board than any other company since the agency was created. The complaint points to 2,651 claims filed by the company with the state, which led to the $33.4 million in payments. It also cited 905 additional claims worth $22.3 million that the state is still reviewing.

Other defendants in the suit are the companies acquired by BP during its tenure in Ohio. They include the Standard Oil Co., Standard Oil of Ohio (SOHIO), Amoco Oil and Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO).

Related: Duke Energy Facing $102.2 Million Pollution Charge

Because BP acquired these companies, the lawsuit said, the Houston-based US affiliate of the British-owned company enjoys “a historic presence” in Ohio that includes thousands of service stations and convenience stores that BP owned, leased, operated, branded and supplied. Each of them, the suit says, was equipped with an underground storage tank, or UST, the suit says.

“Virtually all of the USTs installed at these service stations and convenience stores were steel tanks with steel pipes,” the suit says, and most of them sprung leaks.

In an e-mail, BP spokesman Jason Ryan responded to the lawsuit by saying the company “acted at all times in good faith and believes its dealings with the Ohio state underground storage tank fund have been proper.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News