• 7 days Retail On Pace For Most Bankruptcies And Store Closures Ever In One Year: BDO
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 9 days Majors Oil COs diversify into Renewables ? What synergies forget have with Solar Panels and Wind Tirbines ? None !
  • 4 mins Most ridiculous green proposal
  • 14 hours The Green Hydrogen Problem That No One Is Talking About
  • 5 hours Biden's laptop
  • 14 mins QUESTION: With worldwide 1.4 Billion passenger vehicles and 360 Million commercial vehicles using combustion engines how long before gasoline and distillates measurably decline. .
  • 34 mins Rethinking election outcomes for oil.
  • 2 hours The City of Sturgis Update on the Motorcycle Rally held there, and the MSM's reporting hence
  • 1 day China Sets Its Sights On Global [EV, AI, CRISPR, Fusion, Navel Lint Collector] Dominance
  • 2 hours Video Evidence that the CCP controls Joe Biden
  • 7 hours DOJ confirms FBI investigating Hunter Biden since last year for money laundering.
  • 15 hours Making diamonds from thin air
  • 9 hours P@A will cost Texas Taxpayers $117 Billion.

Obama FY15 Budget Would Eliminate Oil Tax Breaks

President Obama released his fiscal year 2015 budget on March 4, a $3.9 trillion package that includes a range of wish-list items in an election year. Among other things, the budget calls for the elimination of a range of tax breaks that benefit oil, natural gas, and coal companies.

The tax breaks amount to $4 billion annually, and eliminating them is request that the President has called for multiple times over several years. Over ten years, if enacted, cutting the tax breaks would save $48.8 billion over ten years.

The budget also calls for $27.9 billion to fund the Department of Energy, a bump of 2.6% over last year’s funding levels. His budget did call for an increase in spending for DOE’s Fossil Fuel program, mainly focused on research for “clean coal” technologies.

Related Article: Obama Admin Raises Liability Cap for Oil Spills

As for renewable energy, the budget calls for a permanent extension of the production tax credit for wind power, which has suffered from on-again off-again treatment from Congress. It expired at the end of 2013 and was not renewed. If extended, it would cost $19.2 billion over ten years.

However, the budget has a near-zero chance of being implemented, at least without serious changes. The fossil fuel industry has repeatedly pushed back against the President’s plans, and with mid-terms looming, Congress will almost certainly reject the President’s plan. Moreover, many Senate Democrats that are up for reelection come from conservative states that support fossil fuel development, such as Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and Mark Begich (D-AK). Thus, as both parties prepare for the mid-term elections, it is unlikely that there will be major reforms to the tax code or radical changes in spending levels.

In any event, energy reforms in the budget will likely be a sideshow. The most contentious elements of the President’s budget will center around raising the minimum wage, and lower troop levels at the Pentagon.

By Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News