• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 days GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 6 days They pay YOU to TAKE Natural Gas
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 2 days What fool thought this was a good idea...
  • 5 hours A question...
  • 5 days Why does this keep coming up? (The Renewable Energy Land Rush Could Threaten Food Security)
  • 11 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.

New Study Claims Europe Could Wean Itself Off Fossil Fuels With $2.1 Trillion

A study commissioned by a low-carbon investment company has claimed Europe can wean itself off oil, gas, and coal and go full wind and solar for a total price of some $2.1 trillion, equal to 2 trillion euros.

According to the authors, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Research in Germany, the annual investment would come in at some 140 billion euros between now and 2030, and 100 billion euros after 2030.

The company that commissioned the study is Aquila Capital, which, according to its website, is “an investment and asset development company focused on generating and managing essential assets on behalf of its clients. By investing in clean energy and sustainable infrastructure, Aquila Group contributes to the global energy transition and strengthens the world’s infrastructure backbone.”

Reuters reports that, according to the report, most of the $2.1 trillion estimated to be needed for Europe’s shift would go into building more wind and solar power generation capacity, as well as hydrogen production capacity and the development of geothermal resources.

“These figures are considerable, but it is important to remember that the European countries are estimated to have spent an additional 792 billion euros in the last year just on the status quo system to protect consumers from the effects of the energy crisis introduced by the Russian invasion into Ukraine,” the authors wrote.

The study probably hypothesizes continued low costs for wind and solar but in reality, this has not been the case, especially in wind. Several projects have been canceled because they no longer make economic sense in the current price environment and Europe’s total new additions in the first half came in at just 2.1 GW. That’s compared with 11 GW that need to be added every year by 2030 to hit transition targets, WindEurope said.

In solar, problems are rearing their heads as well. European solar component producers are complaining about competition from China but solar installers are warning against tariffs because these would wreck their business.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

ADVERTISEMENT

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on October 05 2023 said:
    This study is suggesting more of the same at considerable cost which the EU can ill afford and which, if available, could be spent more constructively on stimulating an economy stagnating near zero, cost of living hitting the roof and an industrial sector being decimated by relocations and also by the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

    The study is proposing that the EU should spend $2.1 trillion on solar and wind energy to wean the EU off fossil fuels. In effect, spending trillions on myths to solve another myth.

    This is despite having been established irrevocably that renewables on their own are incapable of satisfying global electricity demand because of their intermittent nature and that without fossil fuels the global economy will collapse.

    I will dismiss this study as inviting people and the EU to invest in a project where failure is written all over it.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News