• 4 minutes Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 9 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 17 minutes Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 2 hours Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 1 hour Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 2 hours Tesla Closing a Dozen Solar Facilities in Nine States
  • 4 hours Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 4 hours EU Leaders Set To Prolong Russia Sanctions Again
  • 1 hour Why is permian oil "locked in" when refineries abound?
  • 39 mins Oil prices going down
  • 16 hours Teapots Cut U.S. Oil Shipments
  • 2 mins Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 1 hour Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 12 hours Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 4 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 7 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 17 hours Putin Says 'Fierce' U.S. Politics Hindering Summit With Trump
  • 6 hours EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 17 hours Hot line, Macron: Phone Calls With Trump Are Like Sausages Best Not To Know What Is Inside
What Will Follow The Age Of Oil?

What Will Follow The Age Of Oil?

Natural gas production is exploding…

Lockheed Predict Working Nuclear Fusion Reactor within 10 Years

Nuclear fusion, the ultimate power source, the energy of the future’ that is how it has been described, yet the major problem is that so far it has been virtually impossible to create on a sustainable level.

Traditional nuclear power plants operate reactors that run on nuclear fission. Nuclear fusion in comparison is safer, easier to contain, easier to shut down, far more energy efficient, and produces less radioactive waste.

The goal of nuclear fusion has been pursued for around 60 years, yet due to the demanding conditions that must be met for fusion to take place it has never been fully achieved. However just recently Lockheed Skunk Works has announced that it may be just ten years away from producing a fusion based nuclear power plant.

Related article: Why is Iran Going Nuclear?

Many designs for fusion reactors involve massive investment and construction of huge scientific apparatus which can take years to be completed before they can start to generate power. The resources and infrastructure needed to research and build fusion reactors can only usually be provided by governments, not exactly an expense that they want to shoulder during such tight economic times.

Lockheed’s proposal is enticing due to the fact that it is far smaller than other fusion reactor designs. The plan uses a compact cylinder, rather than the traditional bulky ring, which provides a far stronger magnetic containment field and leaves fewer points where energy can escape.

Lockheed plans to start testing a prototype model in 2017, and scale it up to a full production model by 2022.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Ryan on February 25 2013 said:
    relax tom.
  • Sam Blankenship on February 25 2013 said:
    This sounds similar to LENR devices scheduled for announcement in a few months.
  • Tom on February 20 2013 said:
    I think it is wonderful that we can look forwad to a working fusion reactor in just 10 years. Thats a huge improvement over the 20 yrs that its been for the last 60 or 70 yrs. I guess 10yrs means in 30 or 40 yrs we can look forward to a forcast of 5 yrs.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News