• 4 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 4 hours Adsorbent natural gas tanks are revolutionary.
  • 4 hours Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 3 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 1 hour Visualizing How Much Oil Is In An Electric Vehicle (Hint: a heckuva lot)
  • 15 mins Theresa May to Step Down
  • 7 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 37 mins Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 19 hours Look at the LONGER TERM bigger picture of international oil & gas. Ignore temporary hiccups.
  • 1 day Will Canada drop Liberals, vote in Conservatives?
  • 12 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 1 day Canada's Uncivil Oil War : 78% of Voters Cite *Energy* as the Top Issue
  • 1 day Trump needs to educate US companies and citizens on Chinese Communist Party and People's Liberation Army. This is real ECONOMIC WARFARE. To understand Chinese warfare read General Sun Tzu's "Art of War" . . . written 500 B.C.
  • 16 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 1 day IRAN makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . U.S. makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . IRAQ steps up and plays the mediator. THIS ALLOWS BOTH SIDES TO "SAVE FACE". Then serious negotiations start.
Libyan Oil Industry Stable Despite ISIS Return

Libyan Oil Industry Stable Despite ISIS Return

Libya’s oil industry reported its…

OPEC+ Top Priority: Don’t Crash Oil Prices

OPEC+ Top Priority: Don’t Crash Oil Prices

OPEC+ is reportedly considering increasing…

Keystone XL Saga May Not Be Over Yet Despite Obama Veto

President Obama’s veto of legislation that would have allowed construction of the Keystone XL pipeline was directed only at the bill itself and doesn’t necessarily mean he wouldn’t eventually authorize construction of the project itself.

Obama told Congress on Feb. 24 that his final decision on the pipeline will rely entirely on a review by the State Department, and that any effort by lawmakers to accelerate the process “conflicts with established executive branch procedures.” In other words, because the pipeline would cross an international border, only his office, not Congress, has the jurisdiction to approve it or scrap it.

Given that reasoning, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest was asked if the president may approve the pipeline eventually, even though he has expressed reluctance so far. He replied, “That possibility still does exist. This is an ongoing review.”

Related: Keystone XL Pipeline: Why The Big Fuss?

House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican from Ohio, issued a statement saying the pipeline would be a jobs bonanza for American workers. “It’s embarrassing when Russia and China are plowing ahead on two massive pipelines and we can’t get this one no-brainer of a project off the ground,” he said. “The president is just too close to environmental extremists to stand up for America’s workers.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, said his chamber plans to hold a vote to override the veto by March 3, although neither house of Congress seems to have the two-thirds of votes needed for success. For example, the Keystone legislation passed the Senate in January with 62 votes in favor, five short of the 67 required to override a veto.

Environmental groups welcomed the veto, and are still pressing to have the president kill the Keystone XL project altogether. “This misguided Keystone XL bill, pushed by the fossil fuel industry, has met its just and expected doom,” Rhea Suh, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. “The president got it exactly right by vetoing it.”

Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, agreed, saying in a statement that Obama had “kept his word” by vetoing the legislation. “[B]ut Republicans in Congress continued to waste everyone’s time with a bill destined to go nowhere, just to satisfy the agenda of their big oil allies.” He said he expects the president will veto the project itself once the State Department study is complete.

Related: Should President Obama Veto Keystone XL?

The 1,179-mile pipeline project would ship up to 830,000 barrels of oil sands a day from Canada to refineries on the US coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Supporters say it would create jobs in the United States and help the country become more energy independent.

Opponents counter that most of the jobs will evaporate once the pipeline is built, and that the oil it carries is meant for export, not for use in the United States. They also contend that Canadian oil sands are among the most polluting forms of crude and thus the project would contribute to climate change.

Politically, Republicans see the issue as popular among voters who view Obama as siding with radical environmentalists against the good of the US economy.

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Ghenghis Gary on February 26 2015 said:
    If Obama has authority over trans-border projects of this type, why not construct the pipeline to terminate at to a point just shy of the Canadian border and have the Canadians transport their tar sand oil across the border via existing rail lines where it will then be dumped into the pipeline? It bypasses Obam's authority and allows all of the positive aspects of the pipeline (jobs, safety, efficiency, dependable oil supply, etc.) to proceed. The proposed route of the pipeline has been approved by every state government it transits, its just that precious little area where the US and Canada intersect that is in Obama's wheelhouse and this strategy could remove it from his bludgoning septor.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News