• 5 minutes Drone attacks cause fire at two Saudi Aramco facilities, blaze now under control
  • 7 minutes China Faces Economic Collapse
  • 11 minutes Oil Production Growth In U.S. Grinds To A Halt
  • 13 minutes Iran in the world market
  • 15 minutes Ethanol, the Perfect Home Remedy for A Saudi Oil Fever
  • 17 minutes Experts review Saudi damage photos. Say Said is need to do a lot of explaining.
  • 1 min Let's shut down dissent like The Conversation in Australia
  • 7 hours Saudis Confirm a Cruise Missile from Iranian Origin
  • 2 hours Who Benefits From The "Iran Attacked Saudi Arabia" Narrative?
  • 50 mins Pompeo: Aramco Attacks Are An "Act Of War" By Iran
  • 15 hours Is It Time To Invest In Offshore Drillers?
  • 12 hours Trump Will Win In 2020 And Beyond..?
  • 17 hours Trump new National Security Advisor. Trump easily manipulated.
  • 10 hours Democrats and Gun Views
  • 21 hours Aramco Production
  • 18 hours The Spy Money: U.S. Wants To Seize All Money Edward Snowden Makes From New Book
  • 15 hours Yawn... Parliament Poised to Force Brexit Delay Until Jan. 31
The Hottest Tech Stock For 2020

The Hottest Tech Stock For 2020

A new commodity has taken…

China Just Got Handed The Oil Deal Of A Lifetime

China Just Got Handed The Oil Deal Of A Lifetime

China and Russia are sewing…

Keystone XL Saga May Not Be Over Yet Despite Obama Veto

President Obama’s veto of legislation that would have allowed construction of the Keystone XL pipeline was directed only at the bill itself and doesn’t necessarily mean he wouldn’t eventually authorize construction of the project itself.

Obama told Congress on Feb. 24 that his final decision on the pipeline will rely entirely on a review by the State Department, and that any effort by lawmakers to accelerate the process “conflicts with established executive branch procedures.” In other words, because the pipeline would cross an international border, only his office, not Congress, has the jurisdiction to approve it or scrap it.

Given that reasoning, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest was asked if the president may approve the pipeline eventually, even though he has expressed reluctance so far. He replied, “That possibility still does exist. This is an ongoing review.”

Related: Keystone XL Pipeline: Why The Big Fuss?

House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican from Ohio, issued a statement saying the pipeline would be a jobs bonanza for American workers. “It’s embarrassing when Russia and China are plowing ahead on two massive pipelines and we can’t get this one no-brainer of a project off the ground,” he said. “The president is just too close to environmental extremists to stand up for America’s workers.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, said his chamber plans to hold a vote to override the veto by March 3, although neither house of Congress seems to have the two-thirds of votes needed for success. For example, the Keystone legislation passed the Senate in January with 62 votes in favor, five short of the 67 required to override a veto.

Environmental groups welcomed the veto, and are still pressing to have the president kill the Keystone XL project altogether. “This misguided Keystone XL bill, pushed by the fossil fuel industry, has met its just and expected doom,” Rhea Suh, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. “The president got it exactly right by vetoing it.”

Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, agreed, saying in a statement that Obama had “kept his word” by vetoing the legislation. “[B]ut Republicans in Congress continued to waste everyone’s time with a bill destined to go nowhere, just to satisfy the agenda of their big oil allies.” He said he expects the president will veto the project itself once the State Department study is complete.

Related: Should President Obama Veto Keystone XL?

The 1,179-mile pipeline project would ship up to 830,000 barrels of oil sands a day from Canada to refineries on the US coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Supporters say it would create jobs in the United States and help the country become more energy independent.

Opponents counter that most of the jobs will evaporate once the pipeline is built, and that the oil it carries is meant for export, not for use in the United States. They also contend that Canadian oil sands are among the most polluting forms of crude and thus the project would contribute to climate change.

Politically, Republicans see the issue as popular among voters who view Obama as siding with radical environmentalists against the good of the US economy.

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Ghenghis Gary on February 26 2015 said:
    If Obama has authority over trans-border projects of this type, why not construct the pipeline to terminate at to a point just shy of the Canadian border and have the Canadians transport their tar sand oil across the border via existing rail lines where it will then be dumped into the pipeline? It bypasses Obam's authority and allows all of the positive aspects of the pipeline (jobs, safety, efficiency, dependable oil supply, etc.) to proceed. The proposed route of the pipeline has been approved by every state government it transits, its just that precious little area where the US and Canada intersect that is in Obama's wheelhouse and this strategy could remove it from his bludgoning septor.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play