• 4 minutes Some Good News on Climate Change Maybe
  • 7 minutes Cuba Charges U.S. Moving Special Forces, Preparing Venezuelan Intervention
  • 12 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 15 minutes Solar and Wind Will Not "Save" the Climate
  • 6 hours L.A. Mayor Ditches Gas Plant Plans
  • 3 hours Prospective Cause of Little Ice Age
  • 2 hours *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 12 hours is climate change a hoax? $2 Trillion/year worth of programs intended to be handed out by politicians and bureaucrats?
  • 9 hours students walk out of school in protest of climate change
  • 1 day Most Wanted Man In Latin America For AP Agency: Maduro Reveals Secret Meetings With US Envoy
  • 13 hours Ford In Big Trouble: Three Recalls In North America
  • 1 day Amazon’s Exit Could Scare Off Tech Companies From New York
  • 2 days And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 13 hours Why Is Japan Not a Leader in Renewables?
  • 10 hours Is the Green race a race from energy dependence.
  • 1 day And for the final post in this series of 3: we’ll have a look at the Decline Rates in the Permian
The Biggest Threat To Oil Market Stability

The Biggest Threat To Oil Market Stability

The oil market should be…

Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC

Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC

Washington is making a move…

How much of a 'Gamble' is Chevron's Australian Shale Gas Project?

Chevron (NYSE: CVX) has announced that it has signed a deal with Beach Energy to form a joint venture which will give it a share of 810,000 acres in the Australian outback, where it is estimated that trillions of cubic feet of shale gas lie.

The fields, in the Australia’s Cooper Basin are still very early in their development, and far from any potential LNG export terminal, which has led the Wall Street Journal to label the deal a “gamble”.

But just how risky is it really?

Related article: Chevron Gets Boost As Poland Ease Shale Rules

On paper the deal has been listed as $349 million, but really the initial investment is far less. Chevron will contribute just $95 million in cash during stage 1 of the project, and receive between 18% and 30% of the licences; it will also fund $95 million over the next two years to drill the exploration blocks. The total $180 million is so little that Chevron didn’t even deem it worthy of a press release. It represents a mere drop in the ocean considering Chevron is anticipated to spend $36 billion in 2013, and pails in comparison to other Chevron projects in Australia, such as the Gorgon and Wheatstone LNG projects into which they will pour around $40 billion.

Depending on the success of stage 1, Chevron can then opt to invest an extra $124 million for a larger stake in the project, and continue to drill exploration wells. Not the riskiest of investments in truth, although the problem of a lack of LNG export terminals has still not been addressed.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News