• 5 hours UK On Track To Approve Construction of “Mini” Nuclear Reactors
  • 9 hours LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says
  • 11 hours Oil Nears $52 With Record OPEC Deal Compliance
  • 14 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 16 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 17 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 4 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 4 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 4 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 4 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 5 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 5 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 5 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 6 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 6 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 6 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 7 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 7 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 7 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 7 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 7 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 7 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 7 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
Power Struggles In The DRC Are Hampering Energy Potential

Power Struggles In The DRC Are Hampering Energy Potential

The Democratic Republic of Congo…

Can India Overtake China In The EV Revolution?

Can India Overtake China In The EV Revolution?

India wants to drastically increase…

Greenpeace Lambasts UK’s Support for Importing Oil from Canadian Tar Sands

Greenpeace Lambasts UK’s Support for Importing Oil from Canadian Tar Sands

Has Great Britain just given its strongest show of support for importing Canadian tar sands?

Greenpeace managed to acquire leaked papers regarding EU negotiations on laws that will encourage low carbon transport fuels, and they show that the UK has rejected all suggestions that may class the tar sands as more polluting than crude oil, or other traditional fuels.

Studies have found that oil from tar sands produces 20% more greenhouse gases than conventional crude, and in their fuel quality directive the EU wants to classify it as “highly polluting,” a move that would persuade countries to search for alternatives.

In the negotiations the EU suggest six options about how to implement the fuel quality directive. The UK chose the only two options that would not differentiate between the carbon content of the fuels, and flatly rejected all other possibilities.

In the leaked documents the UK justified their decision by stating that “based on the findings so far, it seems clear that these two seem to meet the policy aims of the directive with the least risks of unexpected consequences.”

Related article: Libya Wants to Sell Oil. Is Anyone Listening?

Charlie Kronick, a senior climate campaigner at Greenpeace, has angrily said that, “if you're not serious about keeping tar sands oil out of Europe, then you're not serious about climate change. This could be the biggest decision Norman Baker will make in his entire career, and right now he's on the wrong side of the science and the wrong side of history.”

However, Norman Baker, the undersecretary at the Department for Transport , has simply stated that Greenpeace is wrong, and that the UK is still very much committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

“We continue to encourage the commission to consider and assess options which account for the carbon intensity of all crude oils, including Canadian oil sands. I take this issue seriously and that is why I have arranged to meet Jim Hansen (NASA climate scientist and outspoken critic of the tar sands) this week to discuss the matter,” he said.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News