• 6 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 8 minutes Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 12 minutes Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 2 hours Judge Approves SEC Settlement With Tesla, Musk
  • 5 hours Two Koreas: U.N. Command Wrap Up First Talks On Disarming Border
  • 3 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 4 hours Censorship has a price: Google’s CEO Defends Potential Return to China
  • 1 hour Gold price on a rise...
  • 1 hour Porsche Says That it ‘Enters the Electric Era With The New Taycan’
  • 3 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 4 hours $70 More Likely Than $100 - YeeeeeeHaaaaa
  • 2 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 2 hours Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 49 mins Dow logs 830-point loss
  • 2 hours Saudi Crown Prince to Trump: We've Replaced All Iran's Lost Oil
  • 3 hours Mexico State Oil
China Turns Its Back On U.S. Oil

China Turns Its Back On U.S. Oil

As the ongoing trade war…

Indicators To Watch As Oil Stocks Flop

Indicators To Watch As Oil Stocks Flop

Stock markets derailed on Wednesday,…

Founder of Greenpeace Worries that Modern Environmentalists are too Extreme

Environmentalists have become more extreme over the years and it is now becoming a major problem for the economy.

Real Clear Energy wrote an interesting paragraph about the founder of Greenpeace and his views of modern environmentalists:

“As Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace, explains, the ‘80s ushered in the age of environmental extremism. The basic issues, for which he and Greenpeace fought, had largely been accomplished, and the general public was in agreement with the primary message. In order for the environmentalists to remain employed, they had to adopt ever more extreme positions. Moore says: "What happened is environmental extremism. They've abandoned science and logic altogether." Their message today is "anti:" anti-human, anti-science, anti-technology, anti-trade and globalization, anti-business and capitalism, and ultimately, anti-civilization.”

Related article: Politics Still Rules the Climate Change Debate in the US

As Moore puts it, environmentalists no longer just try and protect the environment, they are now hindering humanities development. They have changed from pro-green, to anti-everything.

An example is the US economy, which suffers a few problems such as, a lack of well-paid jobs, low revenue, and a lop-sided trade balance. Now, each of these three points could be easily solved with increased coal mining, exporting natural gas as LNG, and building the Keystone XL pipeline, but opposition provided by the environmentalists prevents this.

The US has the world’s largest recoverable reserves of coal, yet due to pressure from green organisations the government has set policies that severely restrict the growth of the mining industry.

Bill Bissett, the President of Kentucky Coal Association, remarked that the “industry is accustomed to market fluctuations and competition with other fuel sources, but having a federal government place additional regulations on one geographic region (Eastern KY and WV) and one industry (coal mining) is absolutely unfair.”

Natural gas actually used to be favoured by environmentalists as a low carbon fuel source, and a step in the right direction to weaning the country off polluting coal. That was until the shale boom led to natural gas becoming too abundant, and too cheap. Natural gas is now a threat to clean energy, as it attracts investment that might have otherwise gone to clean energy sources.

Related article: Exxon Oil Spill in Arkansas, Keystone Spoiler?

A recent HIS Global Insight report stated that LNG exports would “result in the creation of over 100,000 direct, indirect, and economy wide jobs and have an immediate economic impact resulting in $3.6 to $5.2 billion in potential annual revenues.”

Environmentalists have fought the decision to turn shale gas into LNG for export around to more profitable markets around the world, another act that hurts the US economy.

Possibly the biggest casualty of environmental action has been the Keystone XL, which has been attacked for years, and looks ever more likely to be abandoned, costing the US thousands of potential jobs, and millions in additional revenue.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • bongstar420 on March 03 2015 said:
    They favored natural gas until they found out it was abundunt. They only favor things that limit humanity to their conception of proper "coexistence" with "nature."

    I've had these people say that mining asteroids would be morally wrong because we would "pollute" the asteroid belt. After that, their opinions became meaningless to me.
  • silver man on May 11 2013 said:
    obviously people here haven't heard of climate change.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News