• 4 minutes Drone attacks cause fire at two Saudi Aramco facilities, blaze now under control
  • 7 minutes China Faces Economic Collapse
  • 13 minutes Oil Production Growth In U.S. Grinds To A Halt
  • 15 minutes Iran in the world market
  • 18 minutes Ethanol, the Perfect Home Remedy for A Saudi Oil Fever
  • 48 mins USA Wants Iran War -- Shooty Shooty More
  • 37 mins Collateral Damage: Saudi Disruption Leaves Canada's Biggest Refinery Vulnerable
  • 1 hour USA : Attack came from 'Iranian soil'. Pompeo to release 'evidence'.
  • 7 hours Never Bring A Rapier To A Gun Fight
  • 10 hours Bahrain - U.S.: Signed Deal To Buy Patriot Missiles
  • 1 hour Yawn... Parliament Poised to Force Brexit Delay Until Jan. 31
  • 10 hours Trump Will Win In 2020 And Beyond..?
  • 12 hours One of the fire satellite pictures showed what look like the fire hit outside the main oil complex. Like it hit storage or pipeline facility. Not big deal.
  • 12 hours How OPEC and OECD play their role in setting oil price in light of Iranian oil sanction ?? Does the world agree with Iran's oil sanctions ???
  • 7 hours Aramco Production
  • 10 hours Democrats and Gun Views

Forget Keystone XL, TransCanada To Invest More Than $3 Billion Here

The U.S. rejection of the Keystone XL Pipeline may have been a disappointment for TransCanada Corp., the company that wanted to build it, but it wasn’t the only potentially lucrative project in the company’s future.

President Obama announced Nov. 6 that he was rejecting TransCanada’s proposal to build the 1,179-mile pipeline that would have transported 800,000 barrels a day of carbon-laden crude oil from Canada’s oil sands fields to refineries along the Gulf of Mexico. He said it was time to take “serious action to fight climate change.”

At the time, TransCanada CEO Russ Girling reacted with disappointment that it had lost a seven-year struggle for Keystone. “Today, misplaced symbolism was chosen over merit and science,” he said. “Rhetoric won out over reason.” He also said the company hadn’t decided whether to keep fighting to get Washington to change its mind.

Related: UK Banking On NatGas And Nuclear Over Renewables

Now, though, Girling seems more buoyant. Four days after Obama’s rejection, his company won the rights to build a new pipeline in Mexico, the sixth such conduit in a country that TransCanada has targeted for growth.

“There’s a lot of other things going on in the company, and we’ve made quiet progress on a number of those fronts,” Girling said Tuesday during TransCanada’s investor day in Toronto. “You can see that the story is much bigger than Keystone XL.”

During the event, the company said that thanks to the Mexico deal and other projects more modest than Keystone XL, it expects to extend its dividend growth plan of 8 to 10 percent each year for the rest of the current decade.

Related: Will 2016 Be The Year Of Wireless Energy?

The new 163-mile pipeline will move gas from Tuxpan, on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, southwest to the inland industrial city of Tula. Robert Jones, TransCanada’s president of Mexico operations, said the project will give the company “a nice foothold” in Mexico’s gas market.

To win this sixth pipeline project, Jones told Bloomberg on Nov. 13 that TransCanada had to outbid two giants in Mexico’s energy infrastructure: Grupo Carso, owned by business magnate Carlos Slim, and Infraestructure Energetica Nova. Having won the bidding war, TransCanada now has the rights to build and control more than 1,200 miles of pipelines in the country.

Jones said it’s evident that Mexico needs foreign investment to improve its energy infrastructure, and that the deal for the Tuxpan-Tula pipeline was a boon for TransCanada as well, coming as it did just after the U.S. rejection of Keystone XL. He said TransCanada plans to invest more than $3 billion in Mexico over the next two years.

Related: Why French Military Action In Syria Doesn’t Affect Oil Prices

“We see a number of short- and long-term opportunities,” Jones said. Mexico plans to hold as many as five pipeline auctions before the end of January, he said, and TransCanada will “look at them all.”

The company had spent around $2.4 billion on the failed Keystone XL project, but Paul Miller, TransCanada’s director of liquids pipelines, said about 40 percent of that can be recouped. Half of that amount, for example, was spent on hardware, including pipe, that can be re-purposed.

Still, TransCanada’s COO, Alex Pourbaix, says the company won’t merely shrug off the loss of Keystone XL, having learned an important lesson from the experience: “While Keystone and projects like it remain critical to serving North America’s future energy needs, we will only advance them if we can minimize the risks our shareholders experience in the event they don’t proceed.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • carl on November 20 2015 said:
    Just wait another year and it can be passed!!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play