• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 7 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 7 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 7 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 7 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
World Class Copper Auction Draws Major Interest

World Class Copper Auction Draws Major Interest

Peru’s mega Michiquillay copper is…

Florida Utility To Buy Coal Plant For $520m, Then Shut It Down

Florida Utility To Buy Coal Plant For $520m, Then Shut It Down

Florida Power & Light Co. (FPL), the state’s largest utility, is asking the Florida Public Service Commission to let it buy a coal-fired power plant just so it can gradually shut it down in order to save money both for the utility and its customers and help FPL reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

FPL says that under a 1988 contract, it is legally bound to purchase power from the Cedar Bay Generating Plant in North Jacksonville. The utility says its annual fixed payments for the power exceed $120 million a year, with scheduled increases each year until the contract expires in 2024.

Yet if the utility can buy the plant for $520.5 million, the contract would be voided, and FPL can reduce operations there and eventually shut it down altogether to save millions of dollars for the utility. It can then pass $120 million a year in savings to its 4.7 million customers.

Related: Can Utilities Survive 21st Century Energy Market?

What’s more, FPL says, shutting down Cedar Bay would stop the emission of nearly 1 million tons of carbon dioxide into Florida’s atmosphere. That’s the equivalent of reducing gasoline consumption in the state by 100 million gallons or replacing more than 23 million incandescent light bulbs to fluorescent lighting, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency.

FPL also stressed that its planned shutdown of the Cedar Bay coal plant wouldn’t conflict with another major utility in its area, JEA, once known as the Jacksonville Electric Authority. FPL spokeswoman Gerri Boyce pointed out that JEA doesn’t purchase any power from Cedar Bay for its 450,000 electric customers.

As for saving money, FPL told the Public Service Commission that its power generators now use natural gas for the most part, which produces electricity more cleanly than coal and is less expensive. If it’s allowed to buy Cedar Bay, FPL would drastically reduce its capacity to about 5 percent for the next year or so.

Related: Utilities Stumbling Into A New Dawn

By then, FPL’s proposed natural gas pipeline will start pumping fuel into the state, allowing FPL to shut down Cedar Bay for good. Meanwhile, Sarah Gatewood, a spokeswoman for the utility, said FPL would try to find new jobs for the 50 to 60 employees now working at Cedar Bay.

FPL’s decision was welcomed by at least two environmental groups, the Nature Conservancy and the South Alliance for Clean Energy.

“The Nature Conservancy welcomes FPL’s innovative approach to promote energy solutions that will help reduce emissions in Florida,” Temperince Morgan, executive director of the group’s Florida chapter, said in a statement.

Related: Can Tesla’s Latest Venture Live Up To The Hype?

And the South Alliance for Clean Energy applauded the utility’s plan to shutter “a dirty coal power plant.”

“Coal is the biggest source of carbon pollution,” Susan Glickman, the alliance’s Florida director, said in an e-mail to the Sun-Sentinel of Broward and Palm Beach.

But Glickman said any utility’s emphasis should be on solar energy, not natural gas, which is a fossil fuel, even though it burns cleaner than coal. “To meet our carbon reductions we must diversify Florida’s energy portfolio with cost-effective energy efficiency and renewables like solar.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • John Scior on March 16 2015 said:
    Someone made a sweetheart deal to buy the electricity in the first place. Why not just wait a few years and wait til the contract expires. The supposed cost savings don't take into account the fact that you have to find a replacement for the lost generating capacity. The company made a bad deal to begin with now they want their customers to buyout the mistake. I'm sure the reduced capacity will lead to higher electrical rates as a supply decrease should elevate prices. Ifyou see a fat cat on the dock of the bay with a mile wide grin, its an FPL employee and or his cousin at Cedar Bay.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News