• 3 minutes UAE says four vessels subjected to 'sabotage' near Fujairah port
  • 6 minutes Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 8 minutes OPEC is no longer an Apex Predator
  • 12 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 2 hours Australian Voters Reject 'Climate Change' Politicians
  • 6 hours Australia Election Summary: "This was the Climate Change Cult Election, and the Climate Change Cult Lost"
  • 10 hours Canada's Uncivil Oil War : 78% of Voters Cite *Energy* as the Top Issue
  • 1 hour Shale to be profitable in 2019!!!
  • 33 mins Global Warming Making The Rich Richer
  • 14 hours China Downplays Chances For Trade Talks While U.S. Plays ‘Little Tricks’
  • 14 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 14 hours California Threatens Ban on ICE Cars
  • 3 mins Shell ‘to have commercial wind farms’ by early 2020s
  • 14 hours Did Saudi Arabia pull a "Jussie Smollett" and fake an attack on themselves to justify indiscriminate bombing on Yemen city population ?
  • 15 hours "We cannot be relying on fossil fuels to burn as an energy source at all in our country" - Canadian NDP Political Leader
  • 10 hours Some Good News on Climate Change Maybe
  • 6 hours Misunderstanding between USA and Iran the cause of current stand off, I call BS
  • 6 hours DUG Rockies: Plenty Of Promise, Despite The Politics

Finland is Chosen as the Best Location for a Baltic LNG Terminal

Consultants Booz & Company carried out a study at the request of the European Commission into the best location for a LNG terminal in the Baltic. The objective of the terminal is to reduce the dependence of the eastern Baltic countries on natural gas imports from Gazprom. The fact that they are almost completely reliant upon Russian imports gives the soviet state the power to charge high prices.

Finland has come out on top as the ideal location for the new terminal. The only problem is that Finland is currently tied in to a long term gas contract with Gazprom until 2025.

If the LNG terminal cannot be built in Finland then the next choice is Estonia, in the port of Paldiski, due to the fact that connecting the terminal to the local gas grid would be cheap and easy.

Related Article: How Big a Role Will Shale Gas Play in America’s Energy Future?

The report states that “a Finnish terminal would bring the same benefits as a LNG terminal located in Estonia, both in terms of supply diversification and security of supply. Furthermore a LNG terminal in Finland has the advantage to be closer to the centre of biggest gas consumer in the region, namely Finland.”

The east Baltic countries consume about ten billion cubic metres a year of natural gas, with Finland accounting for five billion. The new terminal will have an initial capacity of four billion cubic metres, and is merely intended to offer an alternative to the Russian product in order to encourage lower prices.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News