• 4 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 7 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 11 minutes Algorithms Taking Over Oil Fields
  • 14 mintues NIGERIAN CRUDE OIL
  • 11 mins UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 59 mins Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 9 hours How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 11 hours Blame Oil Price or EVs for Car Market Crash? Auto Recession Has Started
  • 5 hours Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 9 hours German Carmakers Warning: Hard Brexit Would Be "Fatal"
  • 11 hours WSJ: Gun Ownership on Rise in Europe After Terror Attacks, Sexual Assaults
  • 5 hours Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 1 day "Peace Agreement" Russia vs Japan: Control Over Islands Not Up For Discussion
  • 1 day BofA Sees Oil at $35-70
  • 1 day Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 12 hours Trump inclined to declare national emergency if talks continue to stall - Twitter hides this as "sensitive material"
  • 17 hours Orphan Wells
U.S. ‘Tough Line’ On Iran Depends On Crude Prices

U.S. ‘Tough Line’ On Iran Depends On Crude Prices

As the White House compliments…

Heavy Crude: From Glut To Shortage

Heavy Crude: From Glut To Shortage

Some analysts are worrying about…

Finland is Chosen as the Best Location for a Baltic LNG Terminal

Consultants Booz & Company carried out a study at the request of the European Commission into the best location for a LNG terminal in the Baltic. The objective of the terminal is to reduce the dependence of the eastern Baltic countries on natural gas imports from Gazprom. The fact that they are almost completely reliant upon Russian imports gives the soviet state the power to charge high prices.

Finland has come out on top as the ideal location for the new terminal. The only problem is that Finland is currently tied in to a long term gas contract with Gazprom until 2025.

If the LNG terminal cannot be built in Finland then the next choice is Estonia, in the port of Paldiski, due to the fact that connecting the terminal to the local gas grid would be cheap and easy.

Related Article: How Big a Role Will Shale Gas Play in America’s Energy Future?

The report states that “a Finnish terminal would bring the same benefits as a LNG terminal located in Estonia, both in terms of supply diversification and security of supply. Furthermore a LNG terminal in Finland has the advantage to be closer to the centre of biggest gas consumer in the region, namely Finland.”

The east Baltic countries consume about ten billion cubic metres a year of natural gas, with Finland accounting for five billion. The new terminal will have an initial capacity of four billion cubic metres, and is merely intended to offer an alternative to the Russian product in order to encourage lower prices.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News