• 4 minutes China goes against US natural gas
  • 12 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 15 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 19 mins Downloadable 3D Printed Gun Designs, Yay or Nay?
  • 10 hours Rattling With Weapons: Iran Must Develop Military To Guard Against Other Powers
  • 16 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 5 hours Russians hacking vs U.S., Microsoft President: Russians Targeting All Political Sides
  • 5 hours VW Receives Massive Order Of 1,600 All-Electric Trucks
  • 13 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 17 hours CO2 Emissions Hit 67-Year Low In USA, As Rest-Of-World Rises
  • 10 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 20 hours The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 1 day Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 11 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 1 day How To Explain 'Truth Isn't Truth' Comment of Rudy Giuliani?
  • 1 day The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
Crude-By-Rail Could Save The Permian Boom

Crude-By-Rail Could Save The Permian Boom

Crude-by-Rail (CBR) has been a…

Venezuela Takes Unprecedented Action To Stabilize Currency

Venezuela Takes Unprecedented Action To Stabilize Currency

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has…

Finland is Chosen as the Best Location for a Baltic LNG Terminal

Consultants Booz & Company carried out a study at the request of the European Commission into the best location for a LNG terminal in the Baltic. The objective of the terminal is to reduce the dependence of the eastern Baltic countries on natural gas imports from Gazprom. The fact that they are almost completely reliant upon Russian imports gives the soviet state the power to charge high prices.

Finland has come out on top as the ideal location for the new terminal. The only problem is that Finland is currently tied in to a long term gas contract with Gazprom until 2025.

If the LNG terminal cannot be built in Finland then the next choice is Estonia, in the port of Paldiski, due to the fact that connecting the terminal to the local gas grid would be cheap and easy.

Related Article: How Big a Role Will Shale Gas Play in America’s Energy Future?

The report states that “a Finnish terminal would bring the same benefits as a LNG terminal located in Estonia, both in terms of supply diversification and security of supply. Furthermore a LNG terminal in Finland has the advantage to be closer to the centre of biggest gas consumer in the region, namely Finland.”

The east Baltic countries consume about ten billion cubic metres a year of natural gas, with Finland accounting for five billion. The new terminal will have an initial capacity of four billion cubic metres, and is merely intended to offer an alternative to the Russian product in order to encourage lower prices.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News