• 3 minutes Natural gas is crushing wind and solar power
  • 6 minutes OPEC and Russia could discuss emergency cuts
  • 8 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 11 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 13 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 19 mins Oil and gas producers fire back at Democratic presidential candidates.
  • 6 hours So the west is winning, is it? Only if you’re a delusional Trump toady, Mr Pompeo, by Simon Tisdall
  • 10 hours Peak Shale Will Send Oil Prices Sky High
  • 56 mins "Criticism of migration will become a criminal offense.  And media outlets that give room to criticism of migration, can be shut down." - EU Official to the Media.
  • 3 hours Fight with American ignorance, Part 1: US is a Republic, it is not a Democracy
  • 11 hours Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 4 hours CDC covid19 coverup?
  • 1 day “The era of cheap & abundant energy is long gone. Money supply & debt have grown faster than real economy. Debt saturation is now a real risk, requiring a global scale reset.”"We are now in new era of expensive unconventional energy
  • 19 hours Democrats Plan "B" Bloomberg Implodes. Plan "C" = John Kerry ?
  • 1 day Who decides the Oil costs?

Feds To Examine SpaceX Over Possible Impact On Future LNG Terminals

Space X rocket

Federal authorities in the United States will look into the possible effects of a failed rocket launch by SpaceX on the planned construction of liquid natural gas export terminals located in Texas.

On 1 September, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket exploded prior to a routine pre-flight ignition test at Cape Canaveral, Florida. The incident occurred on the eastern coast of the peninsula, but SpaceX is sending rockets into orbit from the same area along the Texas coast that LNG shippers are hoping to use to export shale gas overseas.

As a result, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has requested shippers to hire experts that could determine if there’s any effect between the launch explosion and their plans for LNG.

According to correspondence sent to developers on 27 October, the FERC noted that there are “possible siting concerns posed from potential failed rocket launches.” As a result, “we have determined that more information" is necessary, the FERC said.

LNG developers Texas LNG Brownsville, Annova LNG and Rio Grande LNG didn’t respond to Bloomberg’s requests for comment on the matter. Yet in an e-mailed statement, SpaceX said it values the coordination between the Federal Aviation Administration and the FERC “to protect public safety and resolve any issues related to the proximity” of the launch complex to other facilities.

As the probe continues to look into the cause of the failed launch last September, SpaceX reportedly plans to start test-firing rockets later in November, and also wants to return to active launches prior to the end of this year.

By Erwin Cifuentes for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Rebel44 on November 02 2016 said:
    What a nonsense - during rocket launches, areas under their flight path are restricted zones (both planes and ships are prohobited to be there at that time). This has been in practice for decades, for safety reasons, because quite a few past rocket launches ended with failures (usually big explosion).
  • Bill Simpson on November 02 2016 said:
    Obviously, SpaceX should get the priority land access, since space resources will be being used long after natural gas is a distant memory. Space is infinite. Our little planet, with its tiny supply of hydrocarbons, isn't even a drop in the ocean, compared to infinity.
    To me, it sounds like someone is looking for a bribe. Especially since rockets can be destroyed the second anything goes wrong with them. The debris will fall harmlessly into the Gulf, perhaps killing a few fish.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News