• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 4 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 19 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 1 day EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 15 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 13 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 2 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 6 hours Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 3 days US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 3 days A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 2 days The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 2 days 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 1 day The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
  • 2 days Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
Element 23, A Breakthrough for the Energy Sector

Element 23, A Breakthrough for the Energy Sector

It’s no longer a technological…

BP CEO: $80 Oil Is Unhealthy For The World

BP CEO: $80 Oil Is Unhealthy For The World

BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley…

ExxonMobil Increase Oil Spill Estimate in Light of More Detailed Analysis

ExxonMobil recently released an update to the estimated amount of oil spilled into the Yellowstone River when the Silvertip Pipeline ruptured during the summer. Initially the put the spill at 1,000 barrels of oil (42,000 gallons), but have revised that figure and given a new estimate of 1,509 barrels (63,378 gallons).

Al Jeffers, the media relations manager for the oil major said, "What we've done today is we've informed the various regulators, the EPA, MDEQ, and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration of a revised estimate of 1,509 barrels."

The initial estimate was given so that regulating agencies could devise an appropriate plan of action.
"We brought in a lot of people in a hurry to try and respond as quickly as possible and get this spill cleaned up," had the estimate been given as 1,500 barrels the approach to the situation would have been no different assured Jeffers.

The problem was that a detailed analysis of the spill couldn’t be undertaken until the broken pipeline was fully extracted. "You'll recall a few months ago we were able to remove it from the river and we were able to see that it severed completely-- and that's not typical of a pipeline break. Usually, there is some sort of fissure or crack that will obviously let the oil escape a lot slower, and that was the reason for the lower estimate. Once we realized that the pipeline had severed completely-- probably in a very quick way-- that led us to make some assumptions about the volume spilled, to increase that estimate.


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News