• 45 mins UK On Track To Approve Construction of “Mini” Nuclear Reactors
  • 5 hours LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says
  • 7 hours Oil Nears $52 With Record OPEC Deal Compliance
  • 10 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 12 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 13 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 4 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 4 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 5 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 6 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 6 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 7 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 7 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
Oil Fundamentals Overturn Geopolitical Risk

Oil Fundamentals Overturn Geopolitical Risk

Geopolitical risk from Iraq and…

Brazil Sees Oil Exports Soar

Brazil Sees Oil Exports Soar

Latin America has seen significant…

Exxon Found Oil Trove In Russian Arctic Before Halting Work

Exxon Found Oil Trove In Russian Arctic Before Halting Work

Last week, the largest U.S. energy company, ExxonMobil, bowed to Western sanctions against Russia and withdrew from a joint venture with the Kremlin-owned oil giant Rosneft in the Russian Arctic, but not before it discovered what may be a vast amount of oil.

Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin said Sept. 27 that the finding shows the Arctic Ocean’s Kara Sea north of Russia could become one of the world’s richest sources of crude oil. Before Exxon was forced to withdraw, he said a well containing around 1 billion barrels of oil was found. He added that neighboring geological formations may contain more oil than in the U.S.-controlled area of the Gulf of Mexico.

Sechin told Bloomberg News that the discovery “exceeded our expectations.” He said the well could begin production in as soon as five years, and that the field, now called Universitetskaya, would be renamed Pobeda, or “Victory” in Russian.

Related: Another Western Energy Company Ends Russian Cooperation

Exxon’s reaction was more measured. “We have encountered hydrocarbons, but it is premature to speculate on any potential outcome,” Alan Jeffers, an Exxon spokesman, told The Wall Street Journal.

The European Union and United States have imposed economic sanctions on Russia for what they see as Moscow’s aggressive involvement in the affairs of neighboring Ukraine, unilaterally annexing the Crimean peninsula in March and reportedly providing support in personnel and equipment to Ukraine’s pro-Russian separatists.

The sanctions forbid Western banks to provide long-term financing to Russian oil companies and bar the sale of Western technology to Russian firms. As a result, Rosneft and Exxon can conduct no further drilling, leaving development of the Kara Sea field in limbo.

The Arctic is one of the last regions to be exploited for energy, even though it’s estimated to hold among the largest deposits of gas and oil. In 2011, Exxon and Rosneft agreed to work together to explore a sector of the Russian Arctic larger than Texas at a cost of more than $3.2 billion, most of it to be paid by Exxon.

Related: Western Sanctions Halt Exxon’s Drilling In Russian Arctic

The first joint drilling project was the Universitetskaya well. But regardless of the amount of oil that may or may not have been found there, and regardless of the Western sanctions, neither Rosneft nor Exxon will feel the brunt of the field lying fallow. Under the best of circumstances, it would be years before the two companies could begin extracting useful quantities of oil or gas.

Still, the well has long-term importance for both companies. Exxon needs new sources of oil to make up for the vast amounts it’s already pumped from older wells, which are now becoming depleted.

As for Russia, developing access to the potentially huge energy resources of the Arctic would only strengthen its strategy to increase domestic oil and gas production, the key to its economy and its international influence.

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Lee James on October 01 2014 said:
    Hello, Alex

    You have nicely outlined the Russian propaganda on teo planes shot down in the Ukraine. I believe that most of us over here believe that a missile from the Separatist/Russian side shot down the Malaysian plane. The earlier TU-154 was shot down in a training accident. The Ukrainian military took full responsibility for it and heads rolled.

    As for the Arctic, extracting oil from this area at first appears as a bountiful blessing. We need to be mindful that the seeds of serious environmental and political problems are being sown now in the Arctic.

    I hope that the whole world will shift away from using fossil fuel just as quickly as we can. The world will have a better shot at living together peacefully and without environmental disasters.
  • No Exxon For Me on September 30 2014 said:
    Sounds like more oil for Putin's Tanks to Kill Ukrainians and Crush Europe. Great Job Exxon, I will do my best to avoid your brand for as long as I live.
  • Alex on September 29 2014 said:
    Dear Andy,

    what would you say if it was West who did all it's best to move the Crimea into
    the arms of Russians? The military coup in Kiev was supported by Western countries! There were the Western politicians who visited Kiev to support ultra-nationalists there! And CIA advisers stay in Kiev all this time. What is about Boeing -777? Do you know who was behind this crash? Would you say if there were the Ukrainian military forces? U.S. would publish immediately all the dates if there were the "pro- russian separatists" like it happened in 2003: in 2003 Ukrainian army shouted down the Russian TU-154 and U.S. radars fixed the all parameters of the missile launch (S-200). For sure U.S. military has all the dates about MH017 as well!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News