• 5 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 8 minutes Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 11 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 16 minutes Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 7 hours *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 2 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 42 mins UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 24 hours Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 1 hour Emissions from wear of brakes and tyres likely to be higher in supposedly clean vehicles, experts warn
  • 1 day Connection Between Climate Rules And German's No-Limit Autobahns? Strange, But It Exists
  • 2 days Conspiracy - Theory versus Reality
  • 1 hour How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 2 days Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 23 hours Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 2 days U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Weighs Lifting Tariffs On China
  • 2 days Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
Canada’s Crude Oil Production Cuts Are Unsustainable

Canada’s Crude Oil Production Cuts Are Unsustainable

With Canada’s pipeline bottlenecks weighing…

Oil Prices Lag Despite Early OPEC Cuts

Oil Prices Lag Despite Early OPEC Cuts

OPEC already started cutting crude…

Environmental Group Threatens Exxon With Appeal In New Jersey Case

At least one environmental group is threatening to appeal a judge’s decision approving New Jersey’s settlement of a pollution lawsuit with Exxon Mobil Corp. in which the company would pay the state $225 million, a small fraction of the $8.9 billion that was first sought.

A court found on Aug. 25 that Exxon, which owned and operated oil refineries in northern New Jersey near Bayonne, had contaminated the waters, fields and wetlands in the area. The two sides had been litigating the case for 11 years until they agreed on a proposed settlement in February.

Environmental groups and their allies complained that the administration of Gov. Chris Christie was letting Exxon off easy, given the breadth of the contamination. Eight such groups, along with New Jersey State Sen. Raymond Lesniak, were denied the right to intervene in the case.

Related: How To Profit From Crashing Oil Markets

In his 81-page ruling, State Superior Court Judge Michael Hogan noted that the ruling also appeared to lack popular support. During a 60-day period of public comment, most of the 16,013 individuals who submitted their opinions to the court opposed the deal, it said.

Nevertheless, Hogan approved the deal, calling it “the product of arm’s-length, adversarial negotiations between two highly motivated, sophisticated parties.”

“[A]lthough far smaller than the estimated $8.9 billion in damages,” Hogan wrote, “Exxon’s payment represents a reasonable compromise given the substantial litigation risks” – that is, the likelihood of an appeal.

Related: Does Arctic Drilling Have A Future With Sub $50 Oil?

In fact, the New Jersey Sierra Club has promised just that. Jeff Tittel the group’s director, called the decision a “sellout.” He issued a statement saying, “Instead of protecting the environment and the taxpayers, the Christie Administration wants to protect Exxon.”

Nicole Sizemore, a spokeswoman for Christie, called the settlement “fair and historic,” adding, “The Christie administration has not only secured the largest environmental-damage recovery in state history, but also cemented Exxon Mobil’s obligation to pay for the complete cleanup and remediation of these sites on top of this landmark payout.”

Yet during the trial in 2014, the state argued vehemently for billions – not millions – of dollars in compensation. In one court brief filed last November, the Christie administration argued in a brief that “the scope of the environmental damage resulting from the discharges is as obvious as it is staggering and unprecedented in New Jersey.”

Related: OPEC’s $900 Billion Mistake

But in his ruling, Hogan brushed aside arguments that Christie’s legal team had made an “abrupt change of course,” noting that negotiations on the size of the settlement had begun eight years ago, long before Christie became governor. During that time, the opinion said, “Exxon repeatedly responded to the state’s olive branches with only token offers.”

Hogan wrote that New Jersey’s initial demand for billions in compensation was merely “an aggressive trial strategy … to bring reluctant parties to the table, and the state employed this tactic with success.”

By Andy Tully Of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News