• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 5 hours Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 6 hours Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 34 mins A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 1 hour Used Thin Film Solar Panels at 15 Cents per Watt
  • 6 hours China has invested btw $30 - $40 Billon in Canadian Oil Sands. Trump should put 10% tariffs on all Chinese oil exported into or thru U.S. in which Chinese companies have invested .
  • 12 hours US Shale Economic Impact: GDP gain realized in shale boom’s first 10 years
  • 30 mins IS ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST WAR REQUIRED TO BOLSTER THE OIL PRICE
  • 19 hours It's Not the Job of the Government to Dictate Where Businesses Should Go
  • 12 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 19 hours Offshore subsea sub 50$/bbl : Rystad Energy: High stakes in store for subsea markets if oil falls to $50/bbl
  • 15 hours Philadelphia Energy Solutions seeks to permanently shut oil refinery - sources
  • 16 hours Tit For Tat: China Strikes Back In Trade Dispute With U.S. With New Tariffs
  • 11 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 10 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
Alberta Extends Oil Production Cuts

Alberta Extends Oil Production Cuts

Alberta has announced an extension…

Canada’s Oil Crisis Is Far From Over

Canada’s Oil Crisis Is Far From Over

The negatives for Canadian oil…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

DoE Lost Billions in Deal with Tesla

An article on Slate.com has basically claimed that the government lost more money investing in Tesla than it did in Solyndra. A bold statement considering that Solyndra defaulted on its loan, and Tesla has already paid their loan off, nine years early, and with interest; but here is the reasoning.

In 2009 the global financial crisis was still in full affect. General Motors and Chrysler were heading towards bankruptcy and Tesla had suffered a year of layoffs, cancelled orders, and record losses. The US Department of Energy came to Tesla’s rescue with an offer to lend the company $465 million at incredibly low interest rates. Four years later and Tesla is a roaring success. Valued at more than $12 billion on Wall Street it offers a sharp contrast to Solyndra.

Related article: Bob Lutz Plans to Convert the Fisker Karma into a V8 Gas Guzzler

The DoE invested in Solyndra to the tune of $528 million, yet Solyndra failed to keep its costs down and eventually dissolved, leaving the DoE $528 million out of pocket. Tesla on the other hand paid their entire $465 million loan back with an additional interest of $12 million, on the face of it the DoE are $12 million dollars up, yet in reality they lost potentially billions of dollars in this deal.

The problem is that the feds had Tesla over a barrel and they didn’t use that position to negotiate a proper deal, a deal that other venture capitalist companies would certainly have made, a deal that reflected the risk that the DoE was making when it made the investment. At the time Tesla estimated that a loan from a venture capitalist would charge interest rates of 30-40%, so they were desperate to receive the federal loan at 3-4%, but the DoE did not take advantage.

The government earned a 2.6% return on its investment, yet Elon Musk, who also invested in Tesla at the beginning, earned more than a 3,500% return. The difference being, he negotiated to convert his $38 million loan into stocks in the company, which are now worth $1.4 billion.

Related article: Is the Solar Energy Bubble Finally Bursting?

Just how many billions could the government have earned if it had demanded stock options?

The DoE has defended their decision to not request stock in Tesla, saying that “the loan program wasn’t intended to generate profit; the goal of the program is to provide affordable financing so that America’s entrepreneurs and innovators can build a strong, thriving and growing clean energy industry in the United States.”

By. James  Burgess of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Martin on June 04 2013 said:
    The government is not a "for profit" entity. The government did a good thing here, saved jobs and helped a struggling company. Good on them and here you are bad mouthing them cause they're not greedy pigs. Nice going.
  • Buck on June 03 2013 said:
    The DOE did exactly what should have been done, other than not making the loan in the first place(no such thing as free market these days). The government should never ever be allowed stock options as this is facsism plain and simple look up the definition.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play