• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 3 hours Oil prices going down
  • 19 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 7 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 3 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 19 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 30 mins Sell out now or hold on?
  • 2 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 1 hour Oil and Trade War
  • 19 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 18 hours The Permian Mystery
  • 12 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 12 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 2 hours Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 6 hours Australia mulls LNG import
  • 2 days When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 2 days Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
Is Russia Bailing On The OPEC Deal?

Is Russia Bailing On The OPEC Deal?

Russia, the world’s largest oil…

Canada’s Oil Sands Exports to U.S. Hampered by Infrastructure

The volume of exports to the U.S. Gulf in 2013 coming from Canada’s oil sands fell far short of original estimates. The oil industry projected that about 200,000 barrels per day (bpd) of oil from Canada’s oil sands provinces would reach Gulf Coast refiners by the end of 2013. But, data from December – expected to be the year’s peak – show that deliveries were below 40,000 bpd, according to Reuters. Data from Canada’s National Energy Board show higher numbers – about 57,000 bpd – but still far short of the industry’s original projections.

Related Article:   Oil Train Derailments Reaching Crisis Point

In what has become a crucial detail over the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline, exports of Canada’s oil sands have been significantly hampered by a lack of infrastructure. The U.S. State Department cited industry figures as evidence that oil sands development would happen regardless of the fate of an individual pipeline. The industry would simply shift to rail to make its deliveries. However, it appears that the industry is struggling to make that happen. Making up for the 800,000 bpd capacity of the Keystone XL pipeline would require 13 trains of oil, a mile long each, to reach the Gulf Coast every day. Shipping crude by rail is already more expensive than using pipelines. But with a series of train derailments carrying crude oil over the past year, the industry is being forced into using reinforced train cars, which could contribute to higher costs.

The data gives ammunition to opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline who argue that blocking its construction will slow the development of Canada’s oil sands. The State Department’s Final Environmental Impact Statement disagreed, concluding that the pipeline would have little effect on greenhouse gas emissions since the oil sands would be developed anyways.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News