• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 35 mins Oil prices going down
  • 17 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 5 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 17 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 36 mins After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 1 min Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 47 mins Sell out now or hold on?
  • 17 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 2 days When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 2 days Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
  • 10 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 22 mins Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 16 hours The Permian Mystery
  • 10 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 4 hours Australia mulls LNG import
  • 1 day Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record

Baltimore City Council Wants To Ban New Crude Oil Terminals

Crude oil train

The Baltimore City Council approved on Monday a bill to ban new or expanded crude oil terminals throughout Baltimore City, and if the mayor signs the bill into law, Baltimore would become the first East Coast city to ban this specific kind of infrastructure for fossil fuels.

While the U.S. is increasing its crude production that is already beating the 1970 record, U.S. cities like Portland, Oregon, have used their zoning codes to ban new and expanded crude oil terminals, because federal law prohibits local jurisdictions from regulating commercial rail traffic.

Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh has not yet indicated if she will sign the City Council bill into law, but environmental activists are already calling on the mayor to “protect Balmoreans from dangerous crude oil shipments and climate change,” the Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN) said after the bill was passed.

“This bill is a common sense step to protect the communities of Baltimore most at risk from transport of crude oil and to limit the expansion of climate-polluting fossil fuels” said Leah Kelly, attorney for the Environmental Integrity Project. “We don’t need more of these potentially hazardous crude oil shipment facilities in the city.”

According to the CCAN Fund, a total of 165,000 Baltimoreans live in the crude oil train “blast zone” – the area that could be directly affected if a train were to derail and explode in the city, and there were some close calls in recent years, including derailments in 2001 and 2016.

Related: Shale Boom Creates New U.S. Oil Export Hub

The fund quoted estimates by the International Energy Agency (IEA) that say crude-by-rail exports from Canada to the United States could more than double over the next two years, increasing to 390,000 bpd in 2019, up from 150,000 bpd in late 2017.

“Portland, OR, Vancouver, WA, and South Portland, ME have used their zoning codes to guard against crude oil facilities. This bill is an opportunity for Baltimore to be a leader on the East Coast and join the ranks of cities taking serious climate action,” CCAN said.

While Baltimore is not the first East Coast city to use zoning code rules to ban crude oil shipments, because South Portland, Maine, banned the action of loading of crude oil onto marine tankers, Baltimore could be the first East Coast city to ban a specific kind of infrastructure—crude oil terminals.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Louis Spring on March 14 2018 said:
    And the energy noose just gets tighter on the northeast. Population and energy use grows while these same people deny pipelines being built and oil being imported into their realm. Brownouts and blackouts are next. It gets cold up there....

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News