• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 3 hours Oil prices going down
  • 5 hours Oil and Trade War
  • 18 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 5 hours When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 8 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 10 hours Correlation Between Oil Sweet Spots and Real Estate Hot Spots
  • 8 hours Russia and Saudi Arabia to have a chat on oil during FIFA World Cup - report
  • 5 hours venezuala oil crisis
  • 4 hours Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 3 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 3 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 9 hours Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 5 hours Germany Orders Daimler to Recall 774,000 Diesel Cars in Europe
  • 2 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 18 hours Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 15 hours Trump Renews Attack On OPEC Ahead Of Group's Production Meeting
Did OPEC Need To Cut Oil Output At All?

Did OPEC Need To Cut Oil Output At All?

Global oil demand continues to…

Petrochemicals: The Future For Big Oil

Petrochemicals: The Future For Big Oil

Saudi Aramco has inked a…

BP's Reputation Set to Take a Beating as it Begins its Trial against the Feds

BP is entering the final chapter of the aftermath caused by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 as it prepares to go to trial against the federal government next week. The feds state that they will prove that (NYSE: BP) was grossly negligent in the lead up to, and during, the disaster. The outcome of the case will determine how many more billions BP must pay.

In the two and a half years since the Macondo Well incident BP’s new CEO, Bob Dudley, has slowly rebuilt the company and repaired as best he could its tattered reputation. He has sold $38 billion in assets as part of the ‘shrink to grow’ strategy, reorganised divisions, reemphasised safety, and moved the company forwards. With the start of this trial the feds will trawl through all of the grisly details regarding the worst parts of the spill, bringing the entire affair back into the public eye, and once again damning BP’s reputation.

Related article: BP Energy Outlook 2030: Nothing more than Wishful Thinking

Rupert Bondy, BP’s General Counsel, said that they “have always been open to settlements on reasonable terms,” but “faced with demands that are excessive and not based on reality of the merits of the case, we are going to trial.”

“Gross negligence is a very high bar that BP believes cannot be met in this case. This was a tragic accident, resulting from multiple causes and involving multiple parties. We firmly believe we were not grossly negligent.”

The Department of Justice is pushing for the charges of gross negligence because they have nothing to lose. In fact it could be part of a political ploy; if Obama does approve the Keystone XL pipeline, then he could recover some favour from the environmentalists by reminding them that he had been tough on BP.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News