• 5 minutes Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 11 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 1 day The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 6 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 15 hours Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 hour Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 2 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 2 days Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 11 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 20 hours Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 14 hours Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 2 days France Will Close All Coal Fired Power Stations By 2021
  • 2 days Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 1 day Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds

BHP And Rio Tinto Call For International Carbon Price

Coal

Image copyright: Adam J | Shutterstock.com

Two of the world’s largest mining companies, BHP Billiton (ASX:BHP) and Rio Tinto (LON:RIO) called world leaders on Thursday to seek a deal setting an international price on carbon.

Their plea comes amid fears a climate change deal reached Wednesday between the U.S. and China could hurt coal miners in Australia, the world’s second largest producer of the fossil fuel.

The miners worry a one-sided action to stop increases in carbon dioxide emissions may lead to the imposition of future trade barriers.

Related: How Will The U.S. React to These Unapproved Oil Exports?

According to The Australian, BHP chief executive Andrew Mackenzie was the first to raise his point, saying that while the impact of the agreement was “hard to tell at the moment,” it would be rushed to assume “anything to do with climate is bad for coal’’:

“It needn’t be if the right technology is developed, and people also want to solve the issue of keeping energy affordable and ¬secure,” Mr Mackenzie said.

The deal should not mean “that you drastically move away from coal”, Mr Mackenzie said, advocating that the “the world moves quickly to deal with offsetting technologies like carbon capture and storage”.

Related: BHP To Sell US Shale Assets, Expects $5 Billion Gains By 2017

Rio Tinto’s Sam Walsh, in turn, also emphasized the role of carbon capture and storage technologies, saying he hoped they would lead to a more environmentally friendly way of producing commodities such a coal and steel.

“We have spent $100 million on carbon sequestration projects. We’re very much aligned with this agreement between the U.S. and China and we look forward to the assistance they can provide in bringing these technology advances ahead,’’ he said in a TV interview with ABC.

Both mining leaders will be attending the G20 summit this weekend in Brisbane, Australia, recently under attack for resisting calls by the U.S. and other countries to place climate change on the meeting formal agenda.

By Cecilia Jamasmie

Source – www.mining.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News