• 3 minutes Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 7 minutes Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 12 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 58 mins The Tony Seba report
  • 6 mins Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 14 hours Renewables to generate 50% of worldwide electricity by 2050 (BNEF report)
  • 10 hours Kenya Eyes 200+ Oil Wells
  • 6 mins Erdogan After Erdogan: New Presidential Mandate After Yesterday's Elections
  • 10 hours Are Electric Vehicles Really Better For The Environment?
  • 23 hours Oil prices going Up? NO!
  • 4 hours LNG Shortage on the Way
  • 1 day China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 2 hours Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 19 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 2 days Oil prices going down
  • 10 hours OPEC soap opera daily update
  • 2 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 2 days Tesla Closing a Dozen Solar Facilities in Nine States
  • 1 hour No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
NAFTA Rift Could Be A Boon For Canadian Oil

NAFTA Rift Could Be A Boon For Canadian Oil

President Trump’s plan to renegotiate…

What Will Follow The Age Of Oil?

What Will Follow The Age Of Oil?

Natural gas production is exploding…

BHP And Rio Tinto Call For International Carbon Price

Coal

Image copyright: Adam J | Shutterstock.com

Two of the world’s largest mining companies, BHP Billiton (ASX:BHP) and Rio Tinto (LON:RIO) called world leaders on Thursday to seek a deal setting an international price on carbon.

Their plea comes amid fears a climate change deal reached Wednesday between the U.S. and China could hurt coal miners in Australia, the world’s second largest producer of the fossil fuel.

The miners worry a one-sided action to stop increases in carbon dioxide emissions may lead to the imposition of future trade barriers.

Related: How Will The U.S. React to These Unapproved Oil Exports?

According to The Australian, BHP chief executive Andrew Mackenzie was the first to raise his point, saying that while the impact of the agreement was “hard to tell at the moment,” it would be rushed to assume “anything to do with climate is bad for coal’’:

“It needn’t be if the right technology is developed, and people also want to solve the issue of keeping energy affordable and ¬secure,” Mr Mackenzie said.

The deal should not mean “that you drastically move away from coal”, Mr Mackenzie said, advocating that the “the world moves quickly to deal with offsetting technologies like carbon capture and storage”.

Related: BHP To Sell US Shale Assets, Expects $5 Billion Gains By 2017

Rio Tinto’s Sam Walsh, in turn, also emphasized the role of carbon capture and storage technologies, saying he hoped they would lead to a more environmentally friendly way of producing commodities such a coal and steel.

“We have spent $100 million on carbon sequestration projects. We’re very much aligned with this agreement between the U.S. and China and we look forward to the assistance they can provide in bringing these technology advances ahead,’’ he said in a TV interview with ABC.

Both mining leaders will be attending the G20 summit this weekend in Brisbane, Australia, recently under attack for resisting calls by the U.S. and other countries to place climate change on the meeting formal agenda.

By Cecilia Jamasmie

Source – www.mining.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News