• 4 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 7 minutes Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 13 minutes NordStream2
  • 1 day Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 2 hours California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 1 day "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 1 day GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 3 days "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
  • 8 hours U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 3 days An Indian Opinion on What is Going on in China
  • 13 hours Nord Stream - US/German consultations
  • 3 days Can Technology Keep Coal Plants Alive and Well?
  • 4 days Succession Planning in Human Resources for Vaccinated Individuals in the Oil & Gas Industry
  • 6 days Perfect Energy Storm in Europe: turning our back on fossil fuels is easier said than done!
  • 5 hours Australia sues Neoen for lack of power from its Tesla battery
  • 3 days Storage of gas cylinders
  • 4 days Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.

BHP And Rio Tinto Call For International Carbon Price

Coal

Image copyright: Adam J | Shutterstock.com

Two of the world’s largest mining companies, BHP Billiton (ASX:BHP) and Rio Tinto (LON:RIO) called world leaders on Thursday to seek a deal setting an international price on carbon.

Their plea comes amid fears a climate change deal reached Wednesday between the U.S. and China could hurt coal miners in Australia, the world’s second largest producer of the fossil fuel.

The miners worry a one-sided action to stop increases in carbon dioxide emissions may lead to the imposition of future trade barriers.

Related: How Will The U.S. React to These Unapproved Oil Exports?

According to The Australian, BHP chief executive Andrew Mackenzie was the first to raise his point, saying that while the impact of the agreement was “hard to tell at the moment,” it would be rushed to assume “anything to do with climate is bad for coal’’:

“It needn’t be if the right technology is developed, and people also want to solve the issue of keeping energy affordable and ¬secure,” Mr Mackenzie said.

The deal should not mean “that you drastically move away from coal”, Mr Mackenzie said, advocating that the “the world moves quickly to deal with offsetting technologies like carbon capture and storage”.

Related: BHP To Sell US Shale Assets, Expects $5 Billion Gains By 2017

Rio Tinto’s Sam Walsh, in turn, also emphasized the role of carbon capture and storage technologies, saying he hoped they would lead to a more environmentally friendly way of producing commodities such a coal and steel.

“We have spent $100 million on carbon sequestration projects. We’re very much aligned with this agreement between the U.S. and China and we look forward to the assistance they can provide in bringing these technology advances ahead,’’ he said in a TV interview with ABC.

Both mining leaders will be attending the G20 summit this weekend in Brisbane, Australia, recently under attack for resisting calls by the U.S. and other countries to place climate change on the meeting formal agenda.

By Cecilia Jamasmie

Source – www.mining.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News