• 6 minutes Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 23 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 5 mins Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 1 day Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 23 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 24 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 1 day Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 2 days Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 2 days The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 2 days Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 day Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 17 hours Why hydrogen economics does not work
  • 6 hours Hey Oil Bulls - How Long Till Increasing Oil Prices and Strengthening Dollar Start Killing Demand in Developing Countries?
  • 16 hours China goes against US natural gas

Afghanistan's Natural Resources Could Spark Civil War

It is estimated that Afghanistan contains reserves of natural resources, such as oil, gold, iron ore, copper, lithium, etc., which could be worth trillions of dollars, and offers hope for the future to many of the country’s poor villages which are situated near the resource deposits. The problem is that officials and industry experts are worried that the potential wealth to be made from the resources, has increased the level of corruption, violence, and intrigue in the country.

With the impending departure of NATO forces in 2014, security in Afghanistan is a major concern, and it is now feared that its mineral wealth could trigger a civil war. Powerful regional warlords are already trying to aggressively expand their territories to include areas with mineral wealth, and the Taliban has started making murderous attacks in areas where resource development is planned.

Western officials suspect the motives behind the rejection of a proposed mining law which was intended to attract foreign investment. The reason given was that it was too generous to Western interests, but some believe that the real reason was to keep foreign companies out.

In Bamian, a poor province rich in natural resources, 12 new security huts have been built across the hillside, a possible sign of the intent to start mining operations there, and also of the expected violence to come as a result.

Mohammad Amin, the chief geologist in the region of Bamian, admitted that “if the Taliban are able to make it to this part of the country, this project will be halted and nobody will be able to work.” Unfortunately things are not looking good. The road from Kabul to Bamian is no longer safe for foreigners, and government officials and security forces travelling the region have been subject to a string of attacks.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • spencer on April 19 2014 said:
    why should the u. s. treat this place any different then the rest of the conquests we boldly trample into submission. Lets look at our own past-slaughtering,pilfering lying, cheating and ultimately killing our own indigenous Indians. why you ask? well there are a lot of reasons, but mainly for monetary gain. Not to mention they are simply a nusance. Same thinking applies today as it did a hundred and 50 years ago. Hmmm! now lets get our mining companies in there first, we don't want the bad guys helping themselves to all those precious minerals. finally when it goes down our own news will cover up any and all injustices, like they do every day and you and yours can carry on believing that all we really wanted to do was help those poor collaterally ravaged people. Frankly I wouldn't even be surprised if we sold this propaganda under the guise of religious fervor to both sides.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News