• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 7 hours Greta named Time Magazine "Person of the Year"
  • 2 hours DUMB IT DOWN-IMPEACHMENT
  • 2 hours americavchina.com
  • 3 hours Emissions Soar as Flaring Frenzy Breaks New Records
  • 3 hours Tories on course to win majority
  • 1 day Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 10 hours POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 17 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
  • 1 day WTO is effectively neutered. Trump *already* won the trade war against China and WTO is helpless to intervene
  • 1 day 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
Is A New Price War Looming For OPEC?

Is A New Price War Looming For OPEC?

OPEC has long maintained a…

Could Low Energy Growth Lead To A Recession?

Could Low Energy Growth Lead To A Recession?

The relationship between the energy…

Afghanistan's Natural Resources Could Spark Civil War

It is estimated that Afghanistan contains reserves of natural resources, such as oil, gold, iron ore, copper, lithium, etc., which could be worth trillions of dollars, and offers hope for the future to many of the country’s poor villages which are situated near the resource deposits. The problem is that officials and industry experts are worried that the potential wealth to be made from the resources, has increased the level of corruption, violence, and intrigue in the country.

With the impending departure of NATO forces in 2014, security in Afghanistan is a major concern, and it is now feared that its mineral wealth could trigger a civil war. Powerful regional warlords are already trying to aggressively expand their territories to include areas with mineral wealth, and the Taliban has started making murderous attacks in areas where resource development is planned.

Western officials suspect the motives behind the rejection of a proposed mining law which was intended to attract foreign investment. The reason given was that it was too generous to Western interests, but some believe that the real reason was to keep foreign companies out.

In Bamian, a poor province rich in natural resources, 12 new security huts have been built across the hillside, a possible sign of the intent to start mining operations there, and also of the expected violence to come as a result.

Mohammad Amin, the chief geologist in the region of Bamian, admitted that “if the Taliban are able to make it to this part of the country, this project will be halted and nobody will be able to work.” Unfortunately things are not looking good. The road from Kabul to Bamian is no longer safe for foreigners, and government officials and security forces travelling the region have been subject to a string of attacks.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • spencer on April 19 2014 said:
    why should the u. s. treat this place any different then the rest of the conquests we boldly trample into submission. Lets look at our own past-slaughtering,pilfering lying, cheating and ultimately killing our own indigenous Indians. why you ask? well there are a lot of reasons, but mainly for monetary gain. Not to mention they are simply a nusance. Same thinking applies today as it did a hundred and 50 years ago. Hmmm! now lets get our mining companies in there first, we don't want the bad guys helping themselves to all those precious minerals. finally when it goes down our own news will cover up any and all injustices, like they do every day and you and yours can carry on believing that all we really wanted to do was help those poor collaterally ravaged people. Frankly I wouldn't even be surprised if we sold this propaganda under the guise of religious fervor to both sides.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play