• 3 hours Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 5 hours South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 8 hours Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 8 hours Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 10 hours Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 12 hours ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 3 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 3 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 3 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 3 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 3 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 3 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 3 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 4 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 4 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 4 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 4 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 4 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 4 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 4 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 5 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 5 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 5 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 5 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 5 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 5 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 5 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 5 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 6 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 6 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 6 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 6 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 6 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 6 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 7 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 7 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 7 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 7 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 7 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 7 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
The Hidden Cost Of Electric Cars

The Hidden Cost Of Electric Cars

As countries across the globe…

U.S. Shale To Become Profitable At Last

U.S. Shale To Become Profitable At Last

The recent change in strategy…

$26 A Gallon for Biofuel - Is the Navy Paying too Much to be Green?

$26 A Gallon for Biofuel - Is the Navy Paying too Much to be Green?

At the current RIMPAC, the world’s largest international naval exercise, the US are testing the use of biofuel as part of their plan to ‘green the fleet’ by 2016. The USNS Henry J. Kaiser is carrying 900,000 gallons of biofuel/petroleum mix; 700,000 in the form of hydro-treated renewable diesel fuel, and 200,000 gallons of hydro-treated renewable aviation fuel.

The biofuel has been developed from waste cooking oil and algae oil, and cost a staggering $26 a gallon. Republicans in Washington are not happy.

The Navy released a statement declaring that “investments in biofuel will produce a competitively priced — and domestically produced — alternative to conventional fuel. Such investments help the Navy and the nation become less dependent on foreign oil and thus less subject to volatility in oil prices that directly affect our readiness.” This current trial at RIMPAC will be used to “test, evaluate and demonstrate the cross-platform utility and functionality of advanced biofuels in an operational setting.”

Senator John McCain said that he doesn’t “believe it's the job of the Navy to be involved in building ... new technologies,” because he doesn’t think that “we can afford it.”

Ray Mabus, the Navy Secretary, disagrees, suggesting that the Navy has the purchasing power to increase biofuel production, increasing the research and development which will then lead to lower prices.

The Obama administration has also ignored Republican critics by announcing that the Navy, Department of Agriculture, and Department of Energy have invested $62 million in new biofuel projects.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • alf on July 12 2012 said:
    @cliff The whole point is to invest in the technology and the price comes down. Again, the whole point is to invest in the technology and the price comes down. You even prove this in your propaganda. Navy paid $427/gallon in 2009 and recently they paid $26/gallon. With that progression, they will pay $1.50/gallon in 2015, and that will save the Navy and our country a hundred times more than the investment to make the price come down. Again, the whole point is to invest in the technology and the price comes down. Now go post your propaganda all over the internet.
  • Anonymous on July 08 2012 said:
    Dear Cliff & Charles:

    There are currently 1,865 biofuel companies driving the cost down. Not all of these are going to survive, but with 1,865 companies working to lower the cost of biofuel the renewable fuel price will be competitive with fossil fuel as finite fossil fuel prices continue to increase towards 2020-2030 timeframe. Thus, the DOD, DOE and USDA's investment is a long-term play not a short-term. If the DOD were to only look at short-term investments - would the Navy have ever invested in nuclear submarines or aircraft carriers? Probably not... think long term here not short term.

    If we always made short-term decisions - why would any of us ever go to trade school, vo-tech, or university after high school when we could make quick $ flipping burgers?

    Source: http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2009/05/03/we-do-not-have-a-simple-solution/
  • Charles Maxwell, CDR, USN (Ret) on July 07 2012 said:
    Having spent the greater part of my adult life serving a grateful nation in the US Navy I can say with absolute certainty that our navy has enough on its plate without strapping on another non essential mission such as this is. The Navy's operational budget is always under attack and when end of quarter/year funds are tight, guess where the planners first look for cut backs? If you guessed Fuel Budgets, go to the Foc'sle of the Destroyer! Given the higher costs of the 'new' bio-fuels, where ever will the cut backs come from? Maybe ammo! Maybe personnel! Maybe pick-a-budget-target! The Navy, or military in general, is no place to experiment in the midst of two ongoing wars unless, of course, the experiment has to do with better weapons systems and force protection measures of which, bio-fuel is neither!
  • Cliff Claven on July 06 2012 said:
    How is borrowing money from China to finance deficit spending on biofuels at 5 to 50 times the price of fossil fuels we could be producing right off our own coasts if not prohibited by our government improving our National security? To add a data point, the U.S. Navy paid $4,454.55 a gallon ($187,000 a barrel) in February 2012 to Albemarle Corp. to convert biobutanol into jet fuel, and this doesn't include the money the Navy paid Cobalt to make the biobutanol in the first place. This eclipses the Navy's previous record of paying Solazyme $427.53 a gallon ($18,000 a barrel) for algae diesel oil in 2009. Overall, the U.S. military has purchased 1.3 million gallons of biofuel since 2007 at an average price of $48 per gallon. These biofuels require more energy to create (fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides, farm machinery fuel, fermentation, distillation, hydrotreatment) than they yield in their final product. That energy deficit is input by fossil fuels, and is why making biofuels actually accelerates our use of fossil fuels and increases our dependence upon foreign oil, and why the price of biofuels is and will continue to be as volatile as the price of oil. A host of more thorough lifecycle studies produced since 2008 report that biofuels are more damaging to the environment and cause more greenhouse gases to be released than the direct use of fossil fuels. Meanwhile, the military prices of jet fuel and diesel have never risen above $4.00/gal. Seeing some Congressman take a stand for science and sense instead of politics is refreshing.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News