• 4 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 7 minutes IRAN / USA
  • 11 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 16 minutes Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 7 hours Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
  • 49 mins We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 1 hour Trump capitulated
  • 8 hours Thanks to Trump, the Iranian Mullahs Are Going Bankrupt
  • 14 hours Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 8 mins Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 1 hour US Shale: Technology
  • 2 hours Gravity is a scam!
  • 19 hours Yet another Petroteq debt for equity deal
  • 20 hours Three oil pipeline projects inch toward goal-line for Canada
  • 1 hour Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 2 hours Turkey Muscles-In on Israel-Greece-Cyprus EastMed Gas Pipeline Deal. Erdogan Still Dreaming of Ottoman Empire II.
  • 2 hours What's the Endgame Here?
  • 10 hours Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb is a freelance writer and communications consultant who writes frequently about energy and environment. His work has also appeared in The Christian Science…

More Info

Premium Content

The Real Reason The U.S. Is Interested In Iran

The American obsession with Iran is about oil and natural gas. If these two resources had been absent, it is hard to imagine such an intense American focus on the country from the time of a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency-backed coup of Iran's elected government in 1953 to today. The Foreign Policy magazine piece linked above is based on declassified CIA documents and summarizes the coup this way: "Known as Operation Ajax, the CIA plot was ultimately about oil."

This should come as no surprise. Iran was an oil power back in 1953 and it remains one today. Iran is presumed to have the third largest oil reserves in the world and the second largest natural gas reserves. Even if the numbers cited are somewhat inflated, Iran's reserves are not small, and the country is likely to play a large role in world energy markets for many years to come.

The recent escalation of tensions between the United States and Iran because of the U.S. assassination of a prominent, popular and by all accounts highly effective Iranian general will allow the advocates of war to trot out all manner of excuses for such a war: terrorism, regime change, the credibility of the United States, Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons, and the United States' geostrategic posture vis-à-vis big power rivals such as Russia and China. (Does anyone really know what the last one means?)

What won't be discussed are the deep historical antagonisms which have developed starting with the 1953 CIA-backed coup. For example, few people remember that the United States supplied economic aid, dual-use (both civilian and military use) technology, training and arms through other countries to Saddam Hussein in the Iran-Iraq War. Saddam invaded Iran thinking he could take advantage of the chaos in that country right after the 1979 revolution. In this war Iraq attacked major Iranian cities including Tehran with ballistic missiles and used poison gas on the battlefield. Iran is said to have suffered over 1 million deaths during the eight years of conflict which also created a large class of disabled people. Related: Goldman Sachs: This Oil Rally Won’t Last

It turns out that the Iranian focus on America and its worldwide military, intelligence (covert and otherwise) and diplomatic operations is but a mirror image of the American focus on Iran and its worldwide network of intelligence and allied surrogates that Iran uses to strike at the United States and its allies.

Behind it all are the vast stores of hydrocarbons that make Iran's power possible and its importance substantial in the world. What is strange about this American obsession is that successive American administrations, both Republican and Democratic, have told us that soaring domestic production of oil and natural gas from shale deposits in the United States would free us from foreign sources and lighten our military and security burden abroad. "Energy dominance" became the watchword in the U.S. oil and gas industry.

U.S. net imports of crude oil have dropped from 10 million barrels per day (mbpd) 15 years ago to around 3 mbpd today. And, because of its vast refining capacity, the United States exports about 3 mbpd of refined petroleum products. While the United States remains connected to world markets, the country is far less dependent on foreign sources of oil than in the past.

For natural gas U.S. marketed production now exceeds U.S. consumption. The United States has become an exporter of natural gas.

So, why is the U.S. government and national security establishment still obsessing over Iran? Here are three possible energy-related explanations:

  1. There isn't as much U.S. shale oil and natural gas as we are being told.

This is a real possibility. This independent report—actually an update of previous reports—concludes that forecasts of abundance by the U.S. Energy Information Administration are "extremely optimistic" and "highly unlikely to be realized." The report is based on actual well histories and not industry hype about future resources.

Others who have started to look closely at the data agree that the industry has overblown the potential from shale. And, investors have finally wised up to the fact that the shale industry as a whole has done nothing but destroy their capital over the last decade, losing 80 percent of its market value as of the middle of 2019. Related: Iran's Retaliation Could Cause A Middle East Oil Shock

Free cash flow has been consistently negative for almost all the major players which has forced them time and time again to raise money through the bond and equity markets. Unfortunately for investors, these infusions didn't stabilized shale players. Investors were just throwing good money after bad. Now those investors are finally pulling back.

In short, the shale boom is not sustainable financially or technologically. The "miracle" technology that is bringing oil and natural gas not previously available out of the ground has never been able to make the industry as a whole profitable. Eventually, that will be reflected in production numbers as investors only finance those few players and few prospects that can actually make money.

  1. Iran is a competitor of the U.S. oil industry.

Despite Iran's vast oil and natural gas reserves, its exports have fallen dramatically due to sanctions placed on it by the United States and forced on other countries whose companies do business in America.

The cuts in Iranian oil exports have kept low prices in the oil markets from getting even lower and affecting U.S.-based oil operations negatively. By keeping sanctions in place and continually working toward zero exports from Iran, the U.S. administration is also helping to keep oil prices higher than they otherwise would be and this helps the domestic U.S. oil industry whether the administration intends this result or not.

  1. Iranian energy exports are a way for Iran to extend its influence.

Pakistan backed out of a pipeline project last year because of sanctions imposed by the United States on Iran. The pipeline would have brought Iranian natural gas into the country. The pipeline was originally planned to bring natural gas to India as well before that country pulled out of the project. The U.S. government clearly wants to prevent Iran from using its energy exports to give it leverage with other countries.

No one can say for certain whether current tensions between the United States and Iran will spiral into war. But remember: When they tell you it's not about oil (and natural gas), you can be certain that these resources are at the center of American motives. Absent these resources it would be difficult to understand the United States' decades-long obsession with Iran.

By Kurt Kobb via Resourceinsights.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • Lee James on January 08 2020 said:
    And we have Russia coming into the region, with an oil-control connection there. Russia has built up allies in the region far better than we have. Even if their allies tend toward unsavory types like Assad, they nevertheless are joined together. These allies are largely arrayed against Israel, but there again Putin seems to, on the surface, somehow get a pass from Israel.

    It's an amazing amount of change and I don't think Americans have digested very much of it. We seemed to have a fuzzy picture on what is going on and how to deal with it. Formerly we thought ourselves qualified to do nation-building. Now, we might switch to rebuilding allies in the world.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 08 2020 said:
    The United States’ obsession with Iran is not about oil. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait and UAE could provide the US with all its oil needs.

    The US obsession is linked to the following realities:

    1- Iran is the most important and also the most powerful regional power in the Gulf. It was the policeman of the Gulf in the 1970s during the rule of the Shah with American support and weaponry. It continues in this role now with its own power thus it competes with the United States for influence.
    2- Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz. As such, the global economy has become hostage to its ability to mine and block the Strait thus causing oil prices to soar far above $100 a barrel and precipitate a global oil crisis.
    3- It dominates the Middle East through its proxies and allies, namely the Houthis of Yemen, the Hashd Al Shaabi (Popular Mobilization Forces) in Iraq, Hezbulla in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine.
    4- It also dominates Iraq’s political scene. While the US won the military battle in its 2003 invasion of Iraq, it lost the war. The winners were China emerging as the largest investor in Iraqi oil industry and also the largest buyer of Iraqi oil and Iran emerging with the largest political influence in the country. President Trump may have intended by the assassination of Iran’s military leader General Qassem Suleimani to curtail the growth of Iran’s influence in Iraq and assert the United States’. His tactics will most probably cost him Iraq thus giving Iran a strategic victory of the first order. The Iraqi parliament voted on Sunday to evict the American troops from Iraq. Losing the US military presence would be strategically disastrous not only because Iraq is important in its own right, but also because it will mean the collapse of American presence in the Middle East. Moreover, it would be a tragic irony if America’s misadventure led to a greater Iranian control of Iraq.
    5- Through its allies, Iran encircles Israel from east, north and south. In case of war between Iran and the United States, Israel will not escape missiles attacks from all these directions.
    6- Iran will eventually develop nuclear weapons. After all, it was the United States that provided the Shah of Iran with nuclear technology and shut its ears to boasting by the Shah that he will soon have a nuclear bomb. The clerical regime in Tehran just inherited the Shah’s nuclear programme and extended it further.

    However, I agree with the author that the US shale oil industry is an unprofitable one built on hype and lies. It will be no more in 4-9 years from now.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Krishnan Unni on January 12 2020 said:
    What if Iran is one of the last few hangovers from the Cold War? Their entire propaganda smacks of a Communist-era political pageantry, complete with brainwashed crowds chanting hatred in unison, pledging allegiance to a near-God leader, so on and so forth. It is possible that the Islamic regime will crumble from the weight of its own absurdities in not too distant the future, whether or not aided by the US.

    If the US is after Iran's oil, the same could be said about the US and the Soviet Union. Did the Soviet Union collapse because the US was after its oil? Possibly not. But did oil have something to do with the fall of the Soviets? Quite possibly. The middle of the 1980s were a period of low oil prices much like today. Persistent low oil prices made it hard for the Soviets to meet their budgets, eventually bankrupting the state. Which is kind of what's happening in Iran as well.

    The brilliant thing about the Cold War was that the Soviet Union, the largest arsenal ever assembled, collapsed without a shot being fired. Maybe that will be the case with Iran as well.
  • curtis chun on January 12 2020 said:
    Energy alternate away from carbon will intercede.
    It is blooming.
    Fast.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News