• 20 mins Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 4 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 5 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 7 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 8 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 10 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 11 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 17 hours Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 22 hours British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 1 day Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 1 day Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 1 day Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 1 day OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 1 day London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 1 day Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 2 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 3 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 3 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 3 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 3 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 3 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 3 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 4 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 4 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 4 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 4 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 7 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

How Will Russia’s Annexation of Crimea Affect Energy Markets?

How Will Russia’s Annexation of Crimea Affect Energy Markets?

Russia purportedly intervened in Crimea to protect ethnic Russians from neo-Nazi extremists that Moscow claims have infiltrated the transitional government in Kiev.  The results of the 16 March Crimean referendum are already assumed to be a foregone conclusion, with early figures indicating that the peninsula’s Russian majority voted 93% in favor of unification with Russia.

But the reality probably lies in the two seemingly intractable subjects that unite and divide Russia and Ukraine – energy and military issues.

The former – Russia’s need of Ukraine’s Soviet-era skein of natural gas pipelines that supply Moscow’s most lucrative European markets. Russia provides approximately a quarter of the natural gas consumed in the European Union; approximately 80% of those exports travel through pipelines across Ukrainian soil prior to arriving in the EU.

Beginning in the 1970s, Ukraine began to be crisscrossed by a skein of natural gas and oil pipelines – while many were designed to fulfill the requirements of both the USSR and its Eastern Europe allies, but ultimately European Gazprom clients as well. The energy-poor Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic’s role then was as a transit country, after its energy needs were met.

After the 1991 implosion of the USSR Moscow wanted two things – continued access to Ukraine’s pipelines to continue providing its affluent European clientele and for Kiev to pay ever higher natural gas prices. And so things trundled along for several years, until Ukraine’s mounting gas debts caused Moscow to propose a swap – Ukraine’s multi-billion dollar gas debt for the Ukrainian pipeline network.

Ukraine refused.

Disagreements first arose in March 2005 over the price Ukraine paid for Russian natural gas supplied and the transit costs Ukraine charged Gazprom, along with Russian allegations that Ukraine’s Naftohaz siphoned off a portion of the exports. Irritated by Ukraine’s footdragging over resolving the issues, on 1 January 2006 Russia turned off the taps. Bowing to the cold, three days later Kiev reached a preliminary agreement and supplies were restored. Beginning in October 2007 more disagreements over Ukrainian gas debts, which led to the reduction of gas supplies in March 2008, unsettling Gazprom’s European Union customers. As a state company Gazprom has unique leverage as a foreign policy quasi-state entity, which was deployed yet again in January 2009 when Gazprom cut the gas supply to Ukraine over non-payment issues and quantities to be supplied. The blowback further west was immediate, as the shutoff impacted 18 European countries in the midst of a cold winter. The political hardball severely damaged the image of Russia as a reliable partner.

Now, some analysts believe that the motivation for Putin’s campaign could be to ensure that Gazprom will control Crimean offshore energy assets.

Foreign oil majors believe that Crimea’s onshore and offshore fields will live up to expectation, with expanded exploration of the Black Sea off Crimea gone into overdrive.  ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, Repsol and even Petrochina have begun to show genuine interest in developing Ukraine’s energy assets.

During a meeting last November with foreign oil executives that resulted in an agreement being signed with Chevron then Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich remarked, "Today Ukraine is already successfully cooperating with global companies in the field of hydrocarbon production... Implementation of large-scale projects with Shell and Chevron will allow Ukraine by 2020 to meet all domestic demands for natural gas, and in an optimistic scenario - even export energy resources."

No doubt a scenario most distasteful to Gazprom.

And a booming offshore Crimean hydrocarbon industry could be sustained from the port of Sevastopol, the Black Sea’s finest natural harbor, which could service the Black Sea offshore oil fields and their massive advanced drilling technology, as it’s less than 60 nautical miles from the exploration zones.

All that remains for the Kremlin is to mollify the EU into accepting the Crimean referendum as a fait accompli.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Rudy Haugeneder on March 17 2014 said:
    There are worse problems that will impact on oil prices.
    A realistically pending Iran-Israel war might soon be about to make the Crimea problem look mild. Here's why:
    HAARETZ --" Israeli Defense minister says the United States has projected weakness the world over, from China through the Mideast to Ukraine. "Based on his evaluation that the United States isn’t going to do anything to frustrate the Iranian nuclear program, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon said Monday he’s changed his mind and now leans toward supporting unilateral Israeli action against Iran" according to the Israeli newspaper.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News