• 9 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 19 minutes Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 49 mins Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 6 hours Saudi PIF In Talks To Invest In Tesla Rival Lucid
  • 2 hours How To Explain 'Truth Isn't Truth' Comment of Rudy Giuliani?
  • 6 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 1 min Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 7 hours China goes against US natural gas
  • 7 hours Western Canada Select price continues to sink
  • 6 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 4 hours Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 10 mins The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 4 hours Is NAFTA dead? Or near breakthrough?
  • 5 hours China still to keep Iran oil flowing amid U.S. sanctions
  • 5 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
Alt Text

Is This The Next Natural Gas Giant?

Nigeria has long been renowned…

Alt Text

New Shipping Regulation Could Be A Boon For LNG

The International Maritime Organization’s sulfur…

Alt Text

Ghana Boosts Natural Gas Production

Momentum in Ghana’s hydrocarbons industry…

James Hamilton

James Hamilton

James is the Editor of Econbrowser – a popular economics blog that Analyses current economic conditions and policy.

More Info

Trending Discussions

US Shale Dealt a Blow as Oil Majors Struggle to Turn a Profit

US Shale Dealt a Blow as Oil Majors Struggle to Turn a Profit

Newly exploited tight oil formations account for more than 100% of the increase in U.S. field production of crude oil since 2005. But that doesn't mean it's easy to make money getting oil out of the ground this way.

US Tight Oil Production
Source: EIA.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week:

Royal Dutch Shell (RDSA) plans to sell its stake in the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, following a $2 billion write-down of North American assets that the company announced in August.

Shell's sale of leases on 106,000 acres in the oil-and-gas-rich region illustrates the struggles major oil companies have had in places where smaller energy firms have thrived.

Shell said the Eagle Ford holdings didn't meet the company's targets for size and profitability.

Related article: This Week in Energy: Welcome to the US Shale Reshuffle

An August analysis by Reuters of the company's write-downs cautioned:

However, write downs by Shell and some other majors are a sign they came to the shale boom late in the day, overpaying for lower-quality and less well-explored assets-- not that the shale revolution is stuttering.

The most successful company in the Eagle Ford has been EOG, which produced 94,000 barrels a day from the Eagle Ford in 2012. That's almost a quarter of the 399,000 b/d that the Texas Railroad Commission reported was produced by all the Eagle Ford producers put together in 2012, and a 150% increase over EOG's 2011 Eagle Ford production. But it's interesting that even though EOG reported an average price received around $98/barrel in 2012 compared to $93 in 2011, the company's operating income for the year was down 30% from 2011. Gains in revenue were outweighed by increases in marketing and depletion charges.

Conoco Phillips (COP) produced 89,000 b/d from the Eagle Ford in 2012:Q4, almost as much as EOG, and a 144% increase over what the company produced from Eagle Ford in 2011. Although there are lots of other factors besides Eagle Ford that matter for COP's bottom line, operating income was basically flat year-to-year despite the success in the Eagle Ford. Chesapeake (CHK), another key Eagle Ford producer, reported a big operating loss for 2012.

Tight Oil Production by Company
Source: Jason Stevens, 2012 Symposium on Oil Supply and Demand.

To be sure, other companies are still doing well with the Eagle Ford and other tight formations. But among the challenges to making on-going profits at this game are the very rapid rates at which production flows decline after peaking and the fact that the vast majority of wells produce very little compared to those that receive the most publicity.

Related article: Debate Over US Natural Gas Exports Heats Up

Type well decline curve for Eagle Ford liquids production
Type well decline curve for Eagle Ford liquids production. Source: Hughes (2013).

Distribution of well quality in the Eagle Ford play, as defined by the highest one-month rate of production over well life.
Distribution of well quality in the Eagle Ford play, as defined by the highest one-month rate of production over well life. Source: Hughes (2013).

Getting oil from these sources is critical for America's energy future. That makes it all the more sobering that a savvy company like Shell has decided it wants no part in it.

By. James Hamilton

Source: Econbrowser




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Drew Reil on October 09 2013 said:
    It's not like this is a surprise, a shale formation is not a reservoir and continuous drilling to maintain production has very little if any profit margin. This fact was apparent three years ago at least.
  • Nony on April 04 2016 said:
    Whole lot of nothing in this article. Just some boogeyman since Shell left a play. Basically soundbite, peak oil lite sentiment. Shale grew very fast (with oil at 100+). It didn't turn because it didn't work at 100. It was ACCELERATING. It turned because the world price dropped, to a large extent because of shale itself.
  • Alfred James on February 11 2017 said:
    Here in Kansas, horizontal multiple frac wells cost five times as much as traditional vertical wells, and most will not come near five times production. Huge debt, huge red ink!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News