• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 2 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 7 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 7 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 7 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Controversial Azeri Pipeline Receives $500M Funding

The European Bank of Reconstruction…

Alt Text

The Natural Gas Market Is Set To Boom

With the new lower-for-longer oil…

Alt Text

2 Red Flags For The World’s Top Shale Play

Changing legislation and taxation for…

The Yamal-Europe Natural Gas Pipeline

The Yamal-Europe Natural Gas Pipeline

The 33 billion cubic meters per year (bcm/y) that Europe receives via the Yamal–Europe Pipeline is slightly over 27% of its total natural gas imports from Russia. Of that total, Western Europe receives almost three-quarters and Eastern Europe the remainder; however, the relative dependence upon that gas is much higher among the East European countries.

ANALYSIS: Administrative and political issues have been complicating its continued operation, but a Russian gas cutoff as happened with Ukraine does not appear in the cards.

The Yamal–Europe pipeline runs southwest from the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, a district in Russia’s Arctic administered by the Tiumen Oblast (region). One thousand nine hundred miles later, it crosses into Belarus, then 360 miles later into Poland, before running 420 miles inside Poland (JAMAL) to the German border, where it connects up with the domestic German pipeline system (JAGAL). The 33 bcm/y of gas currently filling the pipeline do not actually come from the Yamal Peninsula but rather from the Nadym Pur Taz district in the Tiumen region.

The pipeline is owned by Gazprom, with the exception of the Polish section. The latter is a joint venture among Gazprom and the Polish companies Polish Gas-Trade and PGNiG. The pipeline is operated in Russia by Gazprom, in Poland by the Russo-Polish joint venture, and in Belarus by the state company Beltransgaz. Complications have recently arisen from the fact that Poland, under new EU competition regulations in the energy sector, is obliged to give foreign companies access to the pipeline.

The development of resources in the Yamal Peninsula proper has consistently fallen behind schedule. State funding has increased since 2009, but an established long-term financing plan does not seem to be in place. This makes it questionable whether the Bovanenkovskoe field, the main Yamal deposit, will be developed within the current revised timetable, even though it might help to resolve the worsening gas deficit in the country. This remains a major big-ticket Gazprom project but its gargantuan dimension, even by Russian standards, makes full implementation questionable.

BOTTOM LINE: Belarus, Poland, and Russia signed intergovernmental agreements on the Yamal-Europe Pipeline in 1993, and the following year a Gazprom-Wintershall joint venture began building the German segment. First-stage gas transmission began in 1997, and the segments through Belarus and Poland were finished in 1999. Since 2005, when construction of all compressor stations was accomplished, the pipeline’s throughput has reached the final-stage projected capacity of 33 bcm/y. There had been plans to build a second 33 bcm/y pipeline, Yamal–Europe Two, through Belarus, to Europe, but Poland and Russia disagreed over the route. Poland wanted it to go through southeast Poland, to Slovakia and Central Europe. Those plans were, however, indefinitely shelved in 2007 in favor of constructing the Nord Stream pipeline under the Baltic Sea from Russia to Germany.

Gazprom and the Belarusian state company Beltransgaz have been in conflict over the amount of Belarus’ debt for gas purchases, as since 2006 Russia has sought to raise its price to “market” (i.e., Western export) levels. Belarus’ President Aleksandr Lukashenka insisted that his country’s participation in building a customs union with Russia and other former Soviet republics entitled it to a recalculation of gas import prices from Russia. (The matter is complicated by the need also to account for Gazprom payments to Belarus for transiting its gas to Europe.) Gazprom replied that the contract formula had to be respected; it has since gained half-ownership of Beltransgaz in partial payment of the accumulating debt. In June 2010, Russia began gradually reducing volumes transmitted to Belarus, which responded by paying the amounts demanded.

Russia is contracted to supply gas to Poland through 2022, and the gas transit contract through their joint venture is in force through 2019. At a November 2010 meeting in Moscow, Gazprom chief Alexei Miller and EU energy commissioner Guenther Oettinger agreed to form a joint working group to discuss how to implement the EU’s Third Energy Package (recently elaborated and which extends through 2020) and how this affects long-term contracts that Gazprom had earlier signed with now-EU member states. Warsaw and Brussels intend to implement mutually agreed rules on how to calculate available network capacity, allocate it “on a transparent and non-discriminatory basis,” implement obligatory reverse-flow services, and condition Yamal’s future development and expansion.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on February 17 2011 said:
    Very good and very useful article. And yes, that pipeline shows shows something that was pointed out to me during a talk I once gave at Cambridge Uni. If you play fair with the Russian gas people, they will do the same with you. After all, the bottom line is the same for all parties. What we once called in the US 'That long green'.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News