• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 1 hour China has invested btw $30 - $40 Billon in Canadian Oil Sands. Trump should put 10% tariffs on all Chinese oil exported into or thru U.S. in which Chinese companies have invested .
  • 5 hours US to Drown the World in Oil
  • 6 hours Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 13 hours A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 7 hours Iran Is Winning Big In The Middle East
  • 2 hours The Rarely Revealed Part of the Nuclear Problem
  • 5 hours With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
  • 6 hours Tit For Tat: China Strikes Back In Trade Dispute With U.S. With New Tariffs
  • 45 mins Used Thin Film Solar Panels at 15 Cents per Watt
  • 10 hours Strait Of Hormuz As a Breakpoint: Germany Not Taking Part In U.S. Naval Mission
  • 15 hours IS ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST WAR REQUIRED TO BOLSTER THE OIL PRICE
  • 12 hours LA Solar Power/Storage Contract
  • 2 hours Trump cancels Denmark visit amid spat over sale of Greenland
  • 10 hours Philadelphia Energy Solutions seeks to permanently shut oil refinery - sources
Alt Text

Gas Flaring “Running Rampant” In The Permian

Gas flaring in the Permian…

Alt Text

Is Big Oil's Natural Gas Bet Turning Sour?

Big Oil has been piling…

Alt Text

Japan Is Bargain Hunting As LNG Prices Slump

Utilities in Japan, the world’s…

Futurity

Futurity

Futurity covers research news from the top universities in the US, UK, Canada and Australia

More Info

Premium Content

Survey Shows Public Support Fracking, but Only with Tighter Regulation

Most Michigan and Pennsylvania residents say hydrofracking is good for the economy, but also have concerns about chemicals used and other environmental risks, a new survey shows.

Fracking is the common term for hydraulic fracturing, which involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals deep into the ground through encased wells at high pressure to create and expand fractures in the shale rock to release trapped oil and natural gas.

The findings represent one of the first attempts to survey public opinion on fracking in more than one state, says Barry Rabe, professor of public policy and of environmental policy at the University of Michigan.

“Pennsylvania has been very aggressive about pursuing its shale resources whereas Michigan is just beginning to expand its involvement,” he says. “So we were somewhat surprised to find that many areas of public opinion were quite similar in the two states.”

The survey found that 82 percent of Michigan residents said that fracking was somewhat or very important to the state economy and in Pennsylvania that number was 84 percent.

Related article: Shale Bust: North America Natural Gas Production set to Seriously Decline

Key economic benefits for the states include royalties or lease payments to landowners, jobs, and fees collected from industry. For example, Pennsylvania collected $204 million last year through per-well impact fees. But overall support for shale gas extraction came in at a middling 54 percent in Michigan and 49 percent in Pennsylvania.

Residents of both states also support regulation and taxation of the hydraulic fracturing industry. A majority, or 52 percent in Michigan and 58 percent in Pennsylvania, support imposing a moratorium on fracking until there is a fuller understanding of the possible risks.

“Respondents in both states feel that benefits from fracking would outweigh problems, but those views are tempered by strong support for regulation of the industry,” Rabe says. “This caution is further reflected in support for a moratorium while potential risks are more fully studied.”

Much of the debate over fracking has focused on the potential contamination of groundwater from injecting chemical laden fracking fluids into the well, stress on the existing water supply due to large amounts of freshwater needed, and then disposal of the wastewater.

For example, in Michigan’s Antrim Shale formation, vertical wells drilled to 500-to-2,000 feet below the surface use about 50,000 gallons of water per well. With horizontal drilling practices that increase the productivity of wells, such as those used in Pennsylvania, well depths of 4,000-to-9,500 feet use as much as 5 million gallons of water per well.

Related article: Exporting U.S. Natural Gas: Yes or No?

Other concerns include increased air emissions of methane and hazardous pollutants as a result of drilling procedures and the lack of disclosure by the industry of chemicals used in fracking fluids.

The use of deep-well injection techniques to store wastewater has also been linked to expanded earthquake activity in Arkansas, Ohio, and the United Kingdom.

Pennsylvania ranks sixth and Michigan ranks 16th in natural gas production among 33 states.

The random telephone survey was conducted last October and November with 415 Michigan residents and 424 Pennsylvania residents. The survey had a margin of error of 5 percent either way.

By. Great Guest




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • poop on May 15 2013 said:
    They are probably supporting it because they arent educated enough to know that it destroys the planet. Instant gratification, who cares about the planet this will create jobs!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play