• 3 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 7 minutes Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 11 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 15 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 2 hours The Pope: "Climate change ... doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain."
  • 6 mins Coal Boom in Asia is Real and a Long Trend
  • 3 mins The Plastics Problem
  • 11 hours China's President Xi To Visit North Korea This Week
  • 3 hours GM Considering Electric Hummer
  • 20 mins Hydrogen FTW... Some Day
  • 14 hours OPEC, GEO-POLITICS & OIL SUPPLY & PRICES
  • 17 hours Why Is America (Texas) Burning Millions of Dollars Per Day Of Natural Gas?
  • 13 hours Forbes: Giant Floating Solar Farms Could Extract CO2 From Seawater, Producing Methanol Fuel.
  • 7 hours The Magic and Wonders of US Shale Supply: Keeping energy price shock minimised: US oil supply keeping lid on prices despite global risks: IEA chief
  • 19 hours As Iran Nuclear Deal Flounders, France Turns To Saudi For Oil
  • 37 mins The Latest: Iranian FM Says US Cannot Expect To ‘Stay Safe’
  • 17 hours Fareed Zakaria: Canary in the Coal Mine (U.S. Dollar Hegemony)
  • 15 hours Hormuz and surrounding waters: Energy Threats to the World: Oil, LNG, shipping markets digest new risks after Strait of Hormuz attack
  • 10 hours Russia removes special military forces from Venezuela . . . . Maduro gone by September ? . . . Oil starts to flow ? Think so . .
Alt Text

A Watershed Moment For Gazprom

The Kremlin’s push for reform…

Futurity

Futurity

Futurity covers research news from the top universities in the US, UK, Canada and Australia

More Info

Trending Discussions

Study Proves Natural Gas Can Bridge the Gap to a Clean Energy Economy

Natural gas is a good transition step on the road to greener energy sources like wind, solar, and nuclear power, says a new study.

Lawrence M. Cathles, Cornell University professor of earth and atmospheric sciences, says natural gas is a smart move in the battle against global climate change.

Published in the most recent edition of the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geosystems, Cathles’ study reviews the most recent government and industry data on natural gas “leakage rates” during extraction, as well as recently developed climate models.

He concludes that regardless of the time frame considered, substituting natural gas energy for all coal and some oil production provides about 40 percent of the global warming benefit that a complete switch to low-carbon sources would deliver.

“From a greenhouse point of view, it would be better to replace coal electrical facilities with nuclear plants, wind farms, and solar panels, but replacing them with natural gas stations will be faster, cheaper, and achieve 40 percent of the low-carbon-fast benefit,” Cathles writes in the study. “Gas is a natural transition fuel that could represent the biggest stabilization wedge available to us.”

Cathles’ study includes additional findings about expanding the use of natural gas as an energy source, as well as the climate impact of “unconventional” gas drilling methods, including hydraulic fracturing in shale formations. They include the following:

•    Although a more rapid transition to natural gas from coal and some oil produces a greater overall benefit for climate change, the 40 percent of low-carbon energy benefit remains no matter how quickly the transition is made, and no matter the effect of ocean modulation or other climate regulating forces.

•    Although some critics of natural gas as a transition fuel have cited leakage rates as high as 8 percent or more of total production during drilling—particularly hydraulic fracturing extraction—more recent industry data and a critical examination of Environmental Protection Agency data supports leakage rates closer to 1.5 percent for both conventional and hydrofractured wells.

•    Even at higher leakage rates, using natural gas as a transition to low-carbon energy sources is still a better policy than “business as usual” with coal and oil, due to the different rates of decay (and hence long-term global warming effect) of carbon dioxide released in greater amounts by burning coal and oil and any methane released during natural gas extraction.

•    Using natural gas as a transition fuel supports the push to low-carbon sources by providing the “surge capacity” when needed, or a buffer when solar and wind production wanes.

“The most important message of the calculations reported here is that substituting natural gas for coal and oil is a significant way to reduce greenhouse forcing, regardless of how long the substitution takes,” Cathles writes.

“A faster transition to low-carbon energy sources would decrease greenhouse warming further, but the substitution of natural gas for other fossil fuels is equally beneficial in percentage terms no matter how fast the transition.”

By. Anne Ju-Cornell




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • SteveF on July 19 2012 said:
    Good. I'd rather drink poisoned water from fracking than be a crispy critter as a result of global warming!
  • Lunzie on July 19 2012 said:
    Seriously?! Using fossil fuels to wean us off fossil fuels? Stop with this old tired argument! We MUST stop using fossil fuels immediately, whether they are solid, liquid or gaseous, in order to minimize global warming. I suggest you read Bill McKibben's recent article in Rolling Stone. He spells it all out for you. We should be transitioning to a low-carbon lifestyle NOW and not putting effort into promoting natural gas. Also, you should live in northeast Pennsylvania in one of those fracked areas and start drinking the polluted water and breathing the polluted air, then you will realize that natural gas is no cleaner than coal or oil. Wake up.
  • DG on July 23 2012 said:
    Natural gas as a bridge?!? Maybe a bridge to nowhere!!

Leave a comment





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News