• 4 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 6 minutes UAE says four vessels subjected to 'sabotage' near Fujairah port
  • 13 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 20 mins Trump bogged down in Mideast quagmire. US spent $Trillions, lost Thousands of lives, and lost goodwill. FOR WHAT? US interests ? WHAT INTEREST ? . . . . China greatest threat next 50 years.
  • 14 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 3 hours Solar Cheaper than Coal
  • 3 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 6 hours Rural and Conservative: Polish Towns Go 'LGBT free' Ahead Of Bitter European Election Campaign
  • 7 hours Global Warming Making The Rich Richer
  • 13 hours California's Oil Industry Collapses Despite Shale Boom
  • 11 hours North Dakota oil output totals 1.39 million b/d in March, up 4% on month: state
  • 9 hours Misunderstanding between USA and Iran the cause of current stand off, I call BS
  • 18 hours Knock-Knock: Aircraft Carrier Seen As Barometer Of Tensions With Iran
  • 17 hours Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 17 hours "We cannot be relying on fossil fuels to burn as an energy source at all in our country" - Canadian NDP Political Leader
  • 10 hours Compensation For A Trade War: Argentina’s Financial Crisis Creates An Opportunity For China
  • 4 hours Crude oil?
Alt Text

China Invests In Game-Changing Arctic LNG Project

Russia’s Novatek is teaming up…

Alt Text

Qatar Doubles Down On LNG Expansion Despite Saudi Blockade

Despite Saudi Arabia’s economic blockade…

Alt Text

Turkey Steps Up Fight For Gas in Eastern Mediterranean

Turkey exploration drilling for natural…

Ferdinand E. Banks

Ferdinand E. Banks

Ferdinand E. Banks, Uppsala University (Sweden), performed his undergraduate studies at Illinois Institute of Technology (electrical engineering) and Roosevelt University (Chicago), graduating with honors in…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Shale Gas: A Real or Unreal Revolution

Unfortunately, the title that I wanted to give this short discussion was already used by Professor Paul Stevens. His contribution is called ‘The Shale Gas Revolution: Hype and Reality’ (2010), and I can mention that other doubters include important researchers such as Jude Clemente (http: www. judeclemente.com), who considers some geopolitics of shale gas production,  and Dave Cohen (of ASPO), as well as the most important energy journalist in Scandinavia, Björn Lindahl, who mentions the large water requirements for shale production, and the considerable ‘natural decline’ experienced by shale deposits (which translates into a higher production cost for shale gas than conventional gas).

Of course, there are other opinions than the one expressed below. For instance, “Shale Gas will Rock your World” is the title of an article (in the New York Times) by a young lady who – nine years earlier – questioned my knowledge of the world oil future. As things turned out, I might have been the only person in a rather large room (during the IAEE international conference in Rome) who understood that OPEC was tired of playing games with its customers, and had launched the strategy that started the oil price to its 2008 crest of  $147 per barrel. That price was quite enough to help push the global macroeconomy into a partial meltdown, from which it has yet to recover.

Now we are being told that shale gas will not only “rock our world”, but ‘change our game’. I certainly hope this is true, although I suspect that many of the promoters of shale gas have adopted some propaganda tricks similar to those employed by the crooks from whom I once purchased my electricity, and who apparently are still be able to convince a portion of their drowsy clientele that the truth is anything that does not sound like a lie.

Among other things, we are constantly being told that thanks to the current and potential exploitation of a revolutionary new technology on this very old resource (shale natural gas), the U.S. possesses a “hundred year” supply of natural gas at present consumption rates. As far as I am concerned, the way to deal with this claim is to ignore it, because demonstrating that it is probably complete nonsense only requires some mathematics that Dr Strangelove would have described as “simple”, and even within the scope of university students like Ferdinand E. Banks – just before he was pronounced as “hopeless” by the Dean of Engineering at Illinois Institute of Technology (Chicago, Illinois), and summarily expelled from that excellent seat of higher learning.

In any event, I believe that the same kind of mathematics is appropriate here as employed in the chapters on oil in my energy economics textbooks (2000, 2007). For example, one hundred years of oil – as calculated from the present reserve-production ratio – actually becomes something quite smaller when such nuisances as profit maximization are taken into consideration. This is because of the cost increases required to raise or maintain output as deposits are depleted.

A few days ago I attended a large meeting on natural gas at the Stockholm School of Economics. I thought that the emphasis would be on shale gas, but that was only a digression. As to be expected, though perhaps not appreciated, when the Q & A began, I attempted to set everybody straight on the past, present and future of shale gas, supplying both answers as well as questions, but I am afraid that my efforts were not accorded the admiration  they deserved by the sponsors of the meeting.

Two young ladies from Finland however gave a very useful presentation of shale gas, and among other things provided an interesting prediction of the percent of shale gas expected in U.S. consumption (or production) in 2035.

An interesting prediction for yours truly that is, because as one of my students at the Asian Institute of Technology (Bangkok) insisted in 2007, the peaking of conventional natural gas output could take place in the U.S. in the not too distant future. Now we see where the mathematics mentioned above comes into the picture. Shale gas will have to compensate for a likely fall or levelling off of the production of conventional natural gas in the U.S., as well as the ‘natural decline’ (assuming that this is as relevant for gas deposits as it is for oil), and in addition help to provide the expected increase in consumption – an increase that will be boosted by what might turn out to be incorrect predictions of the future price of gas due to the  conjectured domestic availability of shale gas resources. Using the numbers provided for the share of shale gas in the U.S. output by the two researchers from Finland,  as well as a few other things, I see no reason to talk about shale gas rocking anything before the global economy resumes its normal rate of growth, and we can get some idea of the future consumption of natural gas and other energy resources.

Increasingly I have long conversation with myself on the subject of shale gas, and accept that shale – as with ‘June’ in a famous American song – could be ‘busting out all over’. I see no signs of this as yet, but admittedly, getting a definitive answer to this puzzle will have to wait for a few years.

By. Professor Ferdinand E. Banks


Banks, Ferdinand E (2007). The Political Economy of World Energy: An Introductory  Textbook.
             London and  Singapore: World Scientific.
______. (2000). Energy Economics: A Modern Introduction. Dordrecht and
          Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Stevens, Paul (2010). The Shale Gas Revolution: Hype and Reality. A Chatham House Report

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News