The views expressed in the post are those of Dennis Coyne and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ron Patterson.
The post that follows relies heavily on the work of Paul Pukite (aka Webhubbletelescope), Jean Laherrere, and Steve Mohr. Any mistakes are my responsibility.
For World Natural Gas URR Steve Mohr estimates 3 cases, with case 2 being his best estimate.
Case 1 URR= 14,000 TCF (trillion cubic feet)
Case 2 URR= 18,000 TCF
Case 3 URR= 27,000 TCF
Jean Laherrere’s most recent World natural gas URR estimate is close to Steve Mohr’s Case 1 at 13,000 TCF.
A Hubbert Linearization(HL) of World Conventional Natural Gas from 1999 to 2014 suggests a URR of 11,000 TCF, an HL from 1982-1998 points to a URR of 6000 TCF for conventional natural gas.
Note that “Conventional” natural gas subtracts US shale gas and US coal bed methane (CBM) from gross output minus reinjected gas for the World.
World Conventional Natural Gas HL (shale gas and CBM output from US deducted)
Currently World cumulative conventional natural gas output (using gross minus reinjected gas following Jean Laherrere’s example) is 4200 TCF, about 38% of the URR.
When shale gas and coalbed methane gas output in the US are added to World Natural Gas, the HL points to a URR of 20,000 TCF, this implies that shale gas, tight gas and CBM might have a combined URR of as much as 9000 TCF. This matches well with the EIA’s 7000 TCF TRR estimate for shale gas and Steve Mohr’s 2500 TCF estimate for CBM.
I suspect the combined shale gas and CBM numbers will be lower (4000 TCF), but that conventional gas will be more than 11,000 TCF (about 15,000 TCF).
World Natural Gas HL below (includes all types of natural gas)
Note that the HL estimate is highly uncertain, the conventional estimate could be a little low (Jean Laherrere estimates 12,000 TCF) and combined shale gas, tight gas, and coal bed methane could vary from 2000 to 9000 TCF.
For the World the USGS estimates about 16,000 TCF of conventional natural gas resources, the EIA estimates 7000 TCF of shale gas resources, and Steve Mohr estimates 2500 TCF of coalbed methane (CBM). The total of these three is similar to Steve Mohr’s high case (case 3), I will use 26,000 TCF for my high case (case C).
The USGS estimates about 1000 TCF for US continuous gas (tight gas, shale gas, and CBM) and my low estimate is that the rest of the World will add another 1000 TCF from continuous natural gas resources.
The total when added to the HL estimate for conventional natural gas resources is about 13,000 TCF, which is my low case (case A).
I suggest 3 cases, with Case B (the average of case A and C) as my best guess.
Case A URR=13,000 TCF
Case B URR=19,000 TCF
Case C URR=26,000 TCF
Cumulative discovery data from 1900 to 2010 is used to estimate a discovery model for each of the three cases. The equation is Q=U/(1+(c/t)^6), where t is years after 1871 (1872=1, 1873=2, etc.), Q is cumulative discoveries of natural gas in TCF, U=URR in TCF, and c is a constant found by a least squares fit to the data.
URR (TCF) c
Chart with 3 discovery models and cumulative discovery data below.
The gap between the discovery model and the discovery data (for the 19000 and 26000 TCF cases) will be filled by backdated future reserve growth of both conventional and unconventional natural gas discoveries.
As a quick reminder the maximum entropy probability distribution is used to estimate the time from discovery to first production and has the form p=1/k*exp(-t/k) where p is the probability that resources discovered in year zero will become a producing reserve after t years(t=0.5, 1.5,…) and 1/k is the average number of years from discovery to first production. Related: Gazprom Putting The Squeeze On Turkmenistan
Note that the median time from discovery to production is about 63% of the mean. If 1/k=29 years, the median time from discovery to first production would be 18 years.
For the models presented, case A has 1/k=25, case B 1/k=29, and case C 1/k=32.
The three scenarios can be compared on the chart below.
Details for the three cases are in the following three charts, with extraction rates (from producing reserves) and annual decline rates on the right axis. The gas output is gross gas minus reinjected gas, dry gas will be about 91% of the gross minus reinjected gas (1980-2011 average).
Case A below.
Below I present a few more charts with the focus on case B, note that the eventual URR is highly uncertain but is likely to be between Case A and C in my view, case B is just the average of the case A and case C URR. Related: Ongoing Security Concerns In Kurdistan Have Oil Companies On Edge
My guess is that the World URR for natural gas will be between 17,000 and 21,000 TCF or +/- 10% of case B, future extraction rates and thus the shape of the output curve after 2014 are unknown.
Producing reserves for case B (also called proved developed producing (PDP) reserves):
Case B discoveries, new producing reserves(n) added to producing reserves (P) each year, and natural gas extracted from P each year (x), aka production.
The extraction rate is e and x=e*P.
Every year n reserves are added to P and x reserves are extracted, if n>x. then P increases and if n<x, P decreases.
If P1 is producing reserves in year 1 and P2 is producing reserves in year 2, then
P2=P1+n2-x2, where n2= new producing reserves added in year 2 and x2 is natural gas produced in year 2.
Often when the decline rate of the model is lower than expected it is because we are forgetting about the new reserves that are continually being developed. It is unlikely that new reserves will stop being developed in the near term, so n is not zero, n will gradually decrease unless disrupted by political or economic crises.
Natural Gas is at an earlier stage of development than crude oil and there is greater uncertainty about the eventual ultimately recoverable resources (URR). Estimates range from 13,000 TCF (Jean Laherrere) to 28,000 TCF (combined EIA and USGS estimates for conventional, shale, and tight gas plus Steve Mohr’s case 3 estimate for coal bed methane.) Related: Warren Buffett And Elon Musk To Spark A Lithium Boom
I decided to match Laherrere’s estimate (13,000 TCF) for my low case based on Hubbert Linearization for conventional natural gas and conservative estimates of World shale gas, tight gas, and coal bed methane URR (2000 TCF total). For the high case I decided to use Mohr’s case 2 estimate for coal bed methane along with USGS and EIA estimates for other natural gas rescources, URR =26,000 TCF. My best guess is just the average of the low and high case, the scenarios presented peak in 2018, 2039, and 2049.
Supplemental charts for Case A and C below:
Discoveries, new producing reserves, and production
Case C charts:
By Dennis Coyne Via Peakoilbarrel
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- Top 6 Most Powerful Women In Oil And Gas
- Where In The World Is The Shale Gas Revolution?
- Long-Predicted U.S. Shale Production Collapse May Not Materialize Yet