• 1 hour South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 4 hours Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 5 hours Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 6 hours Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 8 hours ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 3 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 3 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 3 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 3 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 3 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 3 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 3 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 4 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 4 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 4 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 4 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 4 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 4 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 4 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 5 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 5 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 5 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 5 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 5 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 5 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 5 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 5 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 6 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 6 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 6 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 6 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 6 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 6 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 7 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 7 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 7 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 7 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 7 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 7 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
  • 7 days BP CEO Sees Venezuela As Oil’s Wildcard
Alt Text

Who's Next? Venezuela's Collapse Puts These Nations At Risk

While investors have been ignoring…

Alt Text

Are Electric Cars As Clean As They Seem?

Electric cars are set to…

Alt Text

Oil Tycoon Hamm Slams EIA’s Overoptimistic Shale Forecasts

Shale billionaire and chief executive…

Julianne Geiger

Julianne Geiger

Julianne Geiger is a veteran editor, writer and researcher for US-based Divergente LLC consulting firm, and a member of the Creative Professionals Networking Group.

More Info

Why The Oil Price Crash Is Killing The NHL

Why The Oil Price Crash Is Killing The NHL

With oil prices dipping below $30 and dire forecasts for the already-low Canadian dollar, the National Hockey League (NHL) is taking a hit that would normally lead to a mass exodus of players to Russia—if the ruble wasn’t tanking as well.

The NHL’s revenue depends on the Canadian dollar, which in turn is on the downward slide thanks to the plummeting oil prices. As NHL revenues decline, player salaries go down, and roster cuts go up.

From a profit standpoint, Canadian teams will be hardest hit, and the worst is yet to come if predictions are anything to go by.

The Canadian dollar, or the ‘loonie’, has already slipped below 70 cents on the U.S. dollar for the first time since 2003. And according to MacQuarie—which also had the presence of mind to forecast the dip in the Canadian dollar last fall—the currency is expected to drop to 59 cents on the US dollar by the end of 2016.

This would be an all-time low. The last time it even came close was in 2002, when it hit 61.79 cents on the U.S. dollar.

Yesterday, the Bank of Canada revealed its interest rate decision. While it was expected to cut rates to 0.25 percent, and possibly to 0 percent later this year, it kept them at 0.5 percent. This marked a bit of a vote of confidence in the loonie, which responded up half a cent to 68.89 cents on the U.S. dollar. But within an hour, it was back down to 68.63, finishing the day at 69.03.

Oil is at the heart of this problem, as a large part of Canada’s U.S. dollar income comes from energy industry exports, mostly crude oil. Almost always, when oil falls, the Canadian position against the dollar does the same. The growth of oil sands had previously put the loonie in a good position, but those massive oil sands projects are struggling to stay alive right now—at best. Related: What Do Impairment Charges Mean For Energy Stocks?

What does it have to do with hockey? Well, everything.

The NHL is comprised of 30 teams, with players from 20 different countries. Some 50 percent of these players are Canadian. Seven of the 30 NHL teams are in Canada, while 23 are in the U.S.

Canadian teams take in Canadian dollars through ticket sales, but they pay out the bulk of their expenses—salaries and tons of travel—in U.S. dollars.

While the NHL is headquartered in New York City, it originated in Quebec, and the ‘national’ part of this acronym is Canadian in more ways than one.

The players are paid in U.S. dollars now, but the NHL Canadian franchises receive most of their income in local currency. With a dipping Canadian dollar, this means the teams take a huge hit when they have to pay salaries in U.S. dollars, along with all the travel expenses. Related: Saudi Air Strikes on Yemeni Oil Port; ISIS Attacks Libyan Oil Port

Since 2005, the NHL has capped player salaries based on the league’s revenue. If league revenue takes a hit—and if Macquarie’s predictions come true for this year—the NHL could be looking at a significant salary cut.

The cap was initially set because the league failed to reach a salary bargaining agreement with the players, which led to the cancellation of the entire 2004-2005 season.

It is important to note that not all NHL teams spend at their limit, so some teams and players will be affected more than others.

Should predictions ring true, history offers us a sneak preview of what may be to come for the NHL.

In the 2004-2005 lockout—when we didn’t have NHL hockey for an entire year—there was a mass exodus of players to Europe. Some 400 players—more than half of the league total—hopped transatlantic flights with their sticks to play for European leagues. A 2012 lockout, though shorter, also saw players pack up and leave. Related: Seven Years Of Distortion By The Fed Are About To Take Their Toll

This time around, with the Canadian dollar at its lowest point since 2003 thanks to the oil price crunch, the teams may even be happy to see them go.

During the 2012 lockout, some 30 NHL players moved to Russia to play for the Kontinental Hockey League (KHL). Russia could be a key hockey beneficiary again, should the NHL lower the salary cap.

Or maybe not. Players might not find things much better. The Russian ruble is tanking as well, along with the price of oil and sanctions. Owners say they are broke. Players say they aren’t being paid.

It’s crisis everywhere for hockey, which is as dependent on oil as it is on sticks and pucks.

By Julianne Geiger of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • SRV on January 22 2016 said:
    Lots of maybe's in this piece...

    The cap will sort this out (caps will go down as early as next year, so yes players will get less) and short term, there will most likely be some revenue sharing to soften the blow for the Canadian teams.

    Although they are pretty strong financially... you wouldn't believe the ticket prices in Toronto, and every game is sold out (mostly corporate marketing... tax deductible of course).

    Top players make >$10M so really... what's the point of the story? The thousands of unemployed are to feel sorry for multi millionaire income reductions of 10%?
  • MMM on January 22 2016 said:
    The article misses the major issue.

    The NHL's Canadian broadcast deal is magnitudes larger than the US deal. The Canadian broadcast deal is paid for in Canadian dollars, so when the CAD crashes, the value of the deal goes down significantly. (Love 'em or hate 'em, there are some bright people at the NHL head office. I have little doubt they hedged out much of the currency risk for the first couple of years of the deal. Whether they own up to this fact with the players' union and protect the salary cap is doubtful.)

    This is what drives down league-wide hockey-related revenues (HRR). The loss of HRR related to Canadian dollar ticket sales, etc, is negligible compared to the impact of the CAD decline on the broadcast deal.
  • Tom on January 28 2016 said:
    This commentary betrays a complete lack of understanding of world hockey. So NHL salaries are going to go down? Where are these players going to go instead? The only league in the world that has been able complete on salaries with the NHL is the Russian KHL. Buried at the very end of the article is a begrudging acknowledgement that the KHL is probably impacted by the drop in prices.... YOU THINK? The Russian league is almost exclusively funded by oligarchs that make a tremendous amount of their monies in the energy sector. There's a very real chance the KHL might have to fold half the league and scale everything down, especially salaries. The NHL players won't go to Russia - there aren't going to be any contracts that compare to even the reduced salaries of the NHL.

    A first year player under the new CBA makes at least $525,000 if he spends the entire season in the NHL (without being optioned to the minors). Two years ago the average NHL salary was over $2.5 million, more than the average NFL salary. Even if these salaries are cut by 40%, you're still looking at some very large numbers (albeit smaller in the eyes of the players themselves, as they'll be comparing them to their previous contracts)... no one is going to shed a tear for them and the players won't have a better choice to run to.
  • John Pfeiffer on January 29 2016 said:
    I find it extremely hard to believe they would not hedge, at least near-term, with currency futures contracts.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News