• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 37 mins Oil prices going down
  • 2 hours Oil and Trade War
  • 4 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 15 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 1 hour When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 5 hours Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 14 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 5 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 24 mins Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 6 hours Correlation Between Oil Sweet Spots and Real Estate Hot Spots
  • 1 hour venezuala oil crisis
  • 4 hours Russia and Saudi Arabia to have a chat on oil during FIFA World Cup - report
  • 1 hour Germany Orders Daimler to Recall 774,000 Diesel Cars in Europe
  • 14 hours Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 24 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 24 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC

Breaking News:

Egypt Raises Fuel Prices By Up To 50%

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

WHO Says Air We Breathe is Carcinogenic

WHO Says Air We Breathe is Carcinogenic

The cancer agency of the World Health Organization—the same organization that got Americans to quit smoking--says in a new, dramatic study that the air we breathe is laced with cancer-causing substances and is being officially classified as carcinogenic to humans.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has now put air pollution in the same category as tobacco smoke, UV radiation and plutonium.

According to the organization, while it has long been known that air pollution can cause heart and lung diseases, new evidence has emerged that it was also causing cancer.

Related article: Dutch Designer Creates Giant Electric Vacuum to Suck Smog out of the Air

The IARC points to the most recent data, which shows that 223,000 deaths from lung cancer around the world were caused by air pollution, while more than half of the deaths were thought to be in China and other East Asian countries, but also in eastern North America, some places in Central America and Mexico, as well as North Africa.

The study indicates that in recent years exposure levels have increased significantly in some parts of the world, particularly in rapidly industrializing countries with large populations.

Sources of pollution include car exhaust, power stations, emissions from agriculture and industry, and residential heating, among other things.

Kurt Straif, head of the agency's department dealing with ranking carcinogenic risk, described breathing polluted air as akin to breaking in second-hand tobacco smoke. “We now know that outdoor air pollution is not only a major risk to health in general, but also a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths,” Straif said.

Related article: China’s Plan to Reduce Coal-Fired Electricity Disastrous for Global Climate

IARC's ranking system had already classified many chemicals and mixtures that can be components of air pollution, including diesel engine exhaust, solvents, metals and dusts. But this is the first time that experts have classified air pollution as a cause of cancer.

Other organizations are also working to prove that air pollution causes increased allergies and leads to a rise in infectious diseases.

And there is a climate change twist to this story, as well. The Environmental Defense Fund shows that tick-borne Lyme disease is easier to spread with warmer climates. They also claim that rising water temperatures increase the spread of Cholera.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Joe Kidd on October 27 2013 said:
    If we look at the ROI part of our investment in keeping our environment clean, it would be more economical to fund subsidy of green technology in places where the existing technology being used is archaic and would lead to a significant improvements.

    i.e a dollar will improve outcome much more in China/India than in Switzerland.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News