• 4 minutes China - EU: Xi Says Cooperation Is Mainstream In Their Ties
  • 8 minutes The Mining Industry Has Had It Easy For Far Too Long
  • 11 minutes Lawsuit-Happy Councilor Wants to Take Big Oil to Court
  • 15 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 3 hours Dutch Populists Shock the EU with Election Victory
  • 46 mins Venezuela Says Russian Troops Land to Service Military Equipment
  • 1 hour Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 9 hours Multi-well Pad Drilling Cost Question
  • 19 hours U.S.-China Trade War Poses Biggest Risk To Global Stability
  • 2 hours Public Companies that attended OPEC "THREAT DINNER" at CERRAWEEK must disclose any risks in their SEC Financial filings.
  • 4 hours 3 Pipes: EPIC 900K, CACTUS II 670K, GREY OAKS 800K
  • 2 hours England Running Out of Water?
  • 2 hours Read: OPEC THREATENED TO KILL US SHALE
  • 2 hours Mexico Demands Spain and the Vatican Apologize to Indigenous People for the Spanish Conquest
  • 1 day One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 1 day European Parliament demands Nord-Stream-ii pipeline to be Stopped
  • 2 days Modular Nuclear Reactors
Alt Text

After Libya And Venezuela, Is This The Next OPEC Wildcard?

Anti-government protests in the North…

Alt Text

Trump Boosts U.S. Presence In Taiwan Strait

The United States has sent…

Alt Text

Flurry Of Bearish News Sends Oil Lower

Renewed demand concerns are spooking…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

WHO Says Air We Breathe is Carcinogenic

The cancer agency of the World Health Organization—the same organization that got Americans to quit smoking--says in a new, dramatic study that the air we breathe is laced with cancer-causing substances and is being officially classified as carcinogenic to humans.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has now put air pollution in the same category as tobacco smoke, UV radiation and plutonium.

According to the organization, while it has long been known that air pollution can cause heart and lung diseases, new evidence has emerged that it was also causing cancer.

Related article: Dutch Designer Creates Giant Electric Vacuum to Suck Smog out of the Air

The IARC points to the most recent data, which shows that 223,000 deaths from lung cancer around the world were caused by air pollution, while more than half of the deaths were thought to be in China and other East Asian countries, but also in eastern North America, some places in Central America and Mexico, as well as North Africa.

The study indicates that in recent years exposure levels have increased significantly in some parts of the world, particularly in rapidly industrializing countries with large populations.

Sources of pollution include car exhaust, power stations, emissions from agriculture and industry, and residential heating, among other things.

Kurt Straif, head of the agency's department dealing with ranking carcinogenic risk, described breathing polluted air as akin to breaking in second-hand tobacco smoke. “We now know that outdoor air pollution is not only a major risk to health in general, but also a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths,” Straif said.

Related article: China’s Plan to Reduce Coal-Fired Electricity Disastrous for Global Climate

IARC's ranking system had already classified many chemicals and mixtures that can be components of air pollution, including diesel engine exhaust, solvents, metals and dusts. But this is the first time that experts have classified air pollution as a cause of cancer.

Other organizations are also working to prove that air pollution causes increased allergies and leads to a rise in infectious diseases.

And there is a climate change twist to this story, as well. The Environmental Defense Fund shows that tick-borne Lyme disease is easier to spread with warmer climates. They also claim that rising water temperatures increase the spread of Cholera.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Joe Kidd on October 27 2013 said:
    If we look at the ROI part of our investment in keeping our environment clean, it would be more economical to fund subsidy of green technology in places where the existing technology being used is archaic and would lead to a significant improvements.

    i.e a dollar will improve outcome much more in China/India than in Switzerland.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News