• 4 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 8 minutes Read: OPEC WILL KILL US SHALE
  • 12 minutes Tidal Power Closer to Commercialisation
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 2 hours Why U.S. Growers Are Betting The Farm On Soybeans Amid China Trade War
  • 7 hours Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 33 mins US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 8 hours BATTLE ROYAL: Law of "Supply and Demand". vs. OPEC/Saudi Oil Cartel
  • 18 hours Solar to Become World's Largest Power Source by 2050
  • 1 day THE DEATH OF FOSSIL FUEL MARKETS
  • 1 day Sounds Familiar: Netanyahu Tells Arab Citizens They’re Not Real Israelis
  • 9 hours Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 1 day Can OPEC CUT PRODUCTION FOREVER?
  • 1 day Boeing Faces Safety Questions After Second 737 Crash In Five Months
  • 7 hours Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 23 hours Exxon Aims For $15-a-Barrel Costs In Giant Permian Operation
Alt Text

Big Oil Is Backing Methane Regulation

The oil industry appears to…

Alt Text

IEA Warns Of Looming Oil Market Deficit

The IEA has said that…

Alt Text

U.S.-China Trade Deal Driven By Energy Exports

U.S. energy exports appear to…

Gloria Gonzalez

Gloria Gonzalez

Gloria is a writer for Environmental Finance.Environmental Finance is the leading global publication covering the ever-increasing impact of environmental issues on the lending, insurance, investment…

More Info

Trending Discussions

US Utility Companies to Meet Clean Energy Targets with Nuclear and Coal?

 

Nuclear and cleaner coal would be considered eligible sources in an alternate clean energy standard proposed in the US Senate last week.

The Clean Energy Standard Act of 2010 introduced by Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) would require utilities to obtain 13% of their energy from clean sources by 2013, increasing to 20% by 2020 and continuing to rise by 5% every five years through 2050.

But unlike current proposals for a federal renewable electricity standard (RES), clean energy sources would include coal – if at least 65% of greenhouse gas emissions are captured and sequestered – and new nuclear, as well as renewable energy. The bill would also expand the definitions of biomass and hydroelectric, for example to include more types of forest materials.

Under Graham’s proposal, utilities would be allowed to buy, sell and bank credits for use during subsequent years and would be given credits for early retirement of high-emitting fossil fuel generation facilities. They would also be able to make payments of 3.5 cents per kilowatt hour (adjusted for inflation) in lieu of compliance or to use federal energy efficiency credits to meet up to 25% of the total.

The impact of Graham’s bill on the push for a federal RES this year is unclear. Some are concerned that it could siphon votes from a bill introduced last month by Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico) and Sam Brownback (R-Kansas) that they hope to push forward during the ‘lame-duck’ session, the time between the November elections and before the new Congress is seated in January.

Four Republicans and 28 Democrats are co-sponsoring the Bingaman-Brownback bill, but Graham’s proposal could conceivably draw the support of Republicans and Democrats from states dependent on coal or nuclear power.

Graham indicated that he would be willing to compromise, but Bingaman reportedly is opposed to including nuclear power as an eligible source, because such a move would likely cost him votes in the liberal wing of the Democratic Party.

By. Gloria Gonzalez

Source: Environmental-Finance




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News