• 3 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 6 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 9 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 3 hours Energy from thin air?
  • 3 hours Fast-charging, long-running, bendy energy storage breakthrough
  • 7 hours Can LNG Kill Oil?
  • 13 hours CoV-19: China, WHO, myth vs fact
  • 1 day Has Trump put the USA at the service of Israel?
  • 9 hours The New Class War Exposes the Oligarchs and Enablers
  • 1 day Solar Cells at 25 Cents Apiece (5 cents per watt)
  • 2 hours Foxconn cancelled the reopening of their mfg plants scheduled for tomorrow. Rescheduled to March 3rd. . . . if they're lucky.
  • 1 day Trump reinvented tariffs and it worked
  • 2 hours Hey NYC - Mayor De Blasio declares you must say goodbye to fossil fuels. Get ready to freeze your Virtue Signaling butts off.
  • 7 hours Cheap natural gas is making it very hard to go green
  • 8 hours "For the Public's Interest"
  • 2 days Is cheaper plastics feedstock on the horizon?
Alt Text

Three Innovations To Upend The Energy Storage Market

Batteries are often thought of…

Alt Text

Short Selling In Oil Slows After Initial Coronavirus Panic

Money managers continued to liquidate…

Alt Text

Libya Faces Disaster If Oil Blockade Continues

Libya is facing financial disaster…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Premium Content

Trump’s Pipeline Plans Threaten The Free Market

President Donald Trump has announced that the construction of the highly controversial oil pipelines must use American steel companies as their source to complete the projects.

His plan, however, is much more than aggressive language to appeal to his base. Prior statements from the President have hinted at this mandate, but it is now solidified. The President charged the Department of Commerce with the task of enacting a plan that requires any company manufacturing a pipeline within the borders of the United States to do so using American-made materials and equipment.

The Department of Commerce is yet to comment or report on the requirement that Trump has demanded, but the President has reaffirmed his directive, saying the companies behind both the Keystone XL and the Dakota Access pipelines are going to “have to buy” pipes that are made from raw U.S. steel. Speaking to United States Steel CEO, Trump commented, “And you’re going to be doing pipelines now, you know that, right?”

This piece of regulation creates a problem for TransCanada, the manufacturer of the Keystone XL pipeline. The Canadian company has already built the majority of the pipeline. If any of the pipe that was created by TransCanada was stored outside of the United States – and indeed some of it was – then it will have to be replaced in accordance with Trump’s new regulation. This is creating an increased demand for pipelines in the U.S., and Trump’s comment to United States Steel has led to speculation on whether the U.S. company will be participating in the project. Related: Energy Minister Novak: Russia Cuts More Oil Output In February

The official legislation from the executive order signed by the President reads that the companies constructing pipelines that cross into the United States must use U.S. steel “to the maximum extent possible and to the extent permitted by law.” The World Trade Organization actually has regulations concerning this very issue. Governments currently m U.S.t treat imported materials and products in the same fashion that they would treat domestically produced materials and products. Taking this at face value, it is possible that the parts of the pipe already built and stored outside of the U.S. will be treated as domestic product, and will be not have to be replaced, as originally implied by Trump’s order.

How this new requirement will affect the Dakota Access pipeline is also unclear. As it stands, the pipeline is almost completed, with only a small portion remaining. Will Energy Transfer Partners – the manufacturer of the pipeline – be forced to derive the steal and piping from a U.S. company, even if it has purchase orders with a foreign firm? The plans currently in circulation cite April 1st as the date at which the pipe will be ready to ship oil. The new Trump requirement may very well deter the pipeline from this quickly approaching completion date.

Critics of Trump’s new requirement are demanding an explanation as to why the President feels it is appropriate to interfere with the free markets. This simple executive order could potentially set a precedent by which the government can tell private corporations what to do and how to allocate funds. Some critics have even suggested that the order could incite retaliation from foreign trade partners who expected to participate in these pipelines. Moreover, limited the potential number of suppliers for these pipes will raise the prices substantially, and affords monopoly power to those lucky enough to be accepted.

By Michael McDonald for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • EH on February 28 2017 said:
    I could be snide here, but I won't. Sometimes I wonder what country I was born, educated in worked in and for. It's like every thing WE were all taught,, took a back seat to the CAPITALIST AMERICAN DREAM,, and we have forgotten about UNITY our neighbors, extended families and friends. This Dude who bought his way into our White House BOTHERS ME TO THE CORE,, That said; this is the FIRST POLICY I agree with. It is immoral, unpatriotic to exploit our Country or COUNTRY MEN AND WOMEN, our CHILDRENS FUTURE,, too benefit a one, a few, or MANY CORPORATE PROFITEERING EXEC'S! I believe in raising the bar for those aspiring Foreign Countries,, I do. But not by exploiting them and throwing our own into 3rd world status.
  • Bill Simpson on March 01 2017 said:
    Globalization ended stagflation in the US during the 80's. Wall off the US with trade barriers, and in a few years, it will come roaring back.
  • GLW on March 01 2017 said:
    The Chinese , which dump steel into the USA, must be stopped. They put up obstacles for imports into China, but have no problem allowing Ford, GM, and others to produce cars inside of China. The same can happen here. China can simply buy or build a steel plant here.
  • CompletelyOutsane on March 02 2017 said:
    While I appreciate the sentiment, I don't think construction should be unfairly impeded by this demand.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News