• 10 mins ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 5 hours Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 9 hours Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 12 hours Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 13 hours China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 14 hours Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 15 hours Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 18 hours Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 3 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 3 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 3 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 3 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 4 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 4 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 4 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 4 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
  • 4 days Residents Flee After Nigeria Gas Company Pipeline Explodes
  • 4 days Venezuela To Pre-Mine Petro For Release In 6-Weeks
  • 5 days Trump Says U.S. “Could Conceivably” Rejoin Paris Climate Accord
  • 5 days Saudis Shortlist New York, London, Hong Kong For Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Rigid EU Rules Makes ICE Move 245 Oil Futures Contracts To U.S.
  • 5 days Norway Reports Record Gas Sales To Europe In 2017
  • 5 days Trump’s Plan Makes 65 Billion BOE Available For Drilling
  • 5 days PetroChina’s Biggest Refinery Doubles Russian Pipeline Oil Intake
  • 5 days NYC Sues Five Oil Majors For Contributing To Climate Change
  • 6 days Saudi Aramco Looks To Secure $6B In Cheap Loans Before IPO
  • 6 days Shell Sells Stake In Iraqi Oil Field To Japan’s Itochu
  • 6 days Iranian Oil Tanker Explodes, Could Continue To Burn For A Month
  • 6 days Florida Gets An Oil Drilling Pass
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Staggering Crude Oil Draw
  • 6 days Tesla Begins Mass Production Of Solar Shingles
  • 7 days EIA Boosts World Oil Demand Forecast For 2018 By 100,000 Bpd
  • 7 days Businessman Seeks Sale Of $5.2B Stake In Kazakhstan Oil Field
  • 7 days Exxon Accuses California Of Climate Change Hypocrisy
  • 7 days Norway’s Recovering Oil Industry Resumes Hiring
  • 7 days $2.3 Million Seized Following Singapore Oil Heist
  • 7 days China Nears 2016 Carbon Emissions Target
  • 7 days Oil Companies Respond Slow To New U.S. Lease Plan
  • 7 days Maduro To Issue First 100 Million Petros Despite Skeptics
  • 8 days Iraq Bans Kurdish Firm From Operating Kirkuk Oil Fields
Alt Text

Rig Count Shoots Up As Oil Nears $70

The U.S. rig count has…

Alt Text

Energy Sector Could Benefit Most From Trump’s Tax Plan

President Trump’s recently signed tax…

Alt Text

Is An Oil Price Spike Inevitable?

Oil prices have rallied recently…

Climate Progress

Climate Progress

Joe Romm is a Fellow at American Progress and is the editor of Climate Progress, which New York Times columnist Tom Friedman called "the indispensable…

More Info

Solyndra Bankruptcy Pales in Comparison to Failed Military Projects

Solyndra Bankruptcy Pales in Comparison to Failed Military Projects

Yesterday the Air Force announced that its X-51 Scramjet Engine Demonstrator called the WaveRider — a hypersonic jet designed to travel up to 3,600 miles per hour — crashed into the Pacific Ocean 15 seconds into a test flight.

This is the second failed test in a row for the WaveRider — an aircraft technology that the military has already spent between close to $300 million on developing. And that’s just on one program. We’ve been working on hypersonic flight programs since the 1960′s.

But even with more than a quarter billion dollars worth of hardware now sitting in the Pacific Ocean (chump change for the Pentagon), we haven’t heard a peep from anyone in Washington on the crash. No calls for a Congressional investigation, no outrage about hundreds of millions of dollars sinking in 15 seconds, no public flogging of Defense Department leaders.

But when a few cutting-edge clean energy companies crash after getting support from the federal government, they’re used by the House Republican majority as a tool to question the very idea of making strategic investments in cleantech.

It’s been almost a year since Solyndra, the solar manufacturer that received a $527 million loan guarantee, went bankrupt. Since then, House lawmakers have held 10 hearings, acquired more than 300,000 documents, issued two subpoenas, and likely spent more than a million dollars on the investigation.

What have they found?

“No evidence of wrongdoing,” reported Bloomberg Businessweek.

The Washington Post went further in a recent investigation: “The records do not establish that anyone pressured the Energy Department to approve the Solyndra loan to benefit political contributors.”

This is not to say we should shrug off the bankruptcy of Solyndra and other clean energy companies. It’s Congress’ job to determine whether taxpayer dollars are being spent wisely — and taking a look into the causes and consequences of these types of incidents is important for transparency.

But as we predicted when the Solyndra story first broke, these investigations have turned into a political sideshow. One year later, House lawmakers failed to prove their theory that decisions to offer loan guarantees to clean energy companies were based on political insider deals. Yet they continue to call for more documents and potentially more hearings, hoping to extend the Solyndra “crony capitalism” meme until after the election.

Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) was the most blunt about the House Republicans’ plan for Solyndra: Push the manufactured scandal until November and then drop it after the election.

E&E News reported on Jordan’s comments in March:

 For all the talk over possible “smoking guns” that might show some wrongdoing on the part of the Obama administration on Solyndra or another Department of Energy loan, one House Republican acknowledged on Wednesday that multiple GOP probes on the subject are in some ways a play for votes on Election Day.

“Ultimately, we’ll stop it on Election Day, hopefully. And bringing attention to these things helps the voters and citizens of the country make the kind of decision that I hope helps them as they evaluate who they are going to vote for in November.”

That’s exactly how it’s playing out. The politically-manufactured outrage over Solyndra has turned into an all-out campaign — with tens of millions of dollars being spent this election season specifically targeting federal renewable energy investments.

And here’s the really astonishing disconnect: While supporting tens of thousands of jobs, the loan guarantee program is expected to cost $2 billion less than Congress budgeted for, according to an analysis from Herb Allison, John McCain’s former National Finance Chairman.

Meanwhile, amidst the Solyndra saga, we casually accept a $300 million aircraft failure without batting an eye. No outrage. No sustained political campaign. It’s just another day testing our military toys.

Why? Because we don’t often see programs like this as a “failure” in the political arena. We would never use one failure as an excuse to abandon investment in new technologies. Most politicians accept losses in military R&D expenditures because the long-term gains are potentially so important for national defense and for eventually developing technologies for civilian use.

We should always strive to make programs as efficient and cost-effective as possible. But a few bankrupt clean energy companies representing a fraction of the program’s budgeted cost is no excuse for abandoning federal investments in clean energy — a strategically important sector that is becoming one of the largest drivers of business this century.

Alas, don’t expect anyone to publicly admit this. As the campaign season unfolds, political leaders are all too willing to practice the Solyndra standard.

By. Stephen Lacey

Stephen Lacey is deputy editor of Climate Progress. A version of this post first appeared on Climate Progress.




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Hans Nieder on August 20 2012 said:
    What a defense of a failure, Mr Lacey, by noting an experimental test by the Department of War!

    You have numerous debacles in the Department of Energy, to compare to Solyndra, but then the left always likes to single out our military as wasted resources..

    Once again, your .org agenda well noticed.
  • B. James on September 02 2012 said:
    Clean energy is a far more controversial subject for the political parties. It is more difficult to go against defense spending of any kind publicly. Hopefully, one day, both republicans and democrats will realize that saving the planet is beneficial to everyone.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News