• 3 days Statoil Changes Name
  • 4 days Nuclear Bomb = Nuclear War: Saudi Arabia Will Develop Nuclear Bomb If Iran Does
  • 4 days Tillerson just sacked ... how will market react?
  • 3 days Russian hackers targeted American energy grid
  • 4 hours Country With Biggest Oil Reserves Biggest Threat to World Economy
  • 4 days Petrobras Narrows 2017 Loss, Net Debt Falls Below $85bn
  • 3 days Is $71 As Good As It Gets For Oil Bulls This Year?
  • 4 days Proton battery-alternative for lithium?
  • 4 days Ford Recalls 1.38 Million Vehicles (North America) For Loose Steering Wheel Bolt
  • 3 days Oil Boom Will Help Ghana To Be One Of The Fastest Growing¨Economies By 2018!
  • 4 days I vote for Exxon
  • 4 days South Korea Would Suspend Five Coal - Fire Power Plants.
  • 3 days HAPPY RIG COUNT DAY!!
  • 4 days UK vs. Russia - Britain Expels 23 Russian Diplomats Over Chemical Attack On Ex-Spy.
  • 4 days Why is gold soooo boring?
  • 3 days Spotify to file $1 billion IPO
Alt Text

The Oil Canal That May Never Be

Thailand’s Kra canal project could…

Alt Text

Which Oil Major Has The Best Investment Strategy?

With oil markets having recovered,…

Alt Text

UK Looks To Ditch Russian Gas After Spy Scandal

Following the spy poisoning scandal…

Brian Westenhaus

Brian Westenhaus

Brian is the editor of the popular energy technology site New Energy and Fuel. The site’s mission is to inform, stimulate, amuse and abuse the…

More Info

Trending Discussions

New Technology Could Replace Lithium-Ion Batteries

lithium air battery

University of Southern California (USC) scientists have developed an alteration to the lithium-sulfur battery that could make it more than competitive with the lithium-ion battery. The solution is for one of the biggest stumbling blocks to the next wave of rechargeable batteries – small enough for cellphones and powerful enough for cars.

Lithium-sulfur battery with Mixed Conduction Membrane barrier to stop polysulfide shuttling. Image Credit: Sri Narayan and Derek Moy at USC. Click image for the largest view.

In a paper published in the January issue of the Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Sri Narayan and Derek Moy of the USC Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute outline how they developed an alteration to the lithium-sulfur battery that could make it more than competitive with the industry standard lithium-ion battery.

The lithium-sulfur battery, long thought to be better at energy storage capacity than its more popular lithium-ion counterpart, has been hampered by its short cycle life. Currently the lithium-sulfur battery can be recharged 50 to 100 times – impractical as an alternative energy source compared to 1,000 times for many rechargeable batteries on the market today.

The solution devised by Narayan and lead author and research assistant Moy is something they call the “Mixed Conduction Membrane,” or MCM, a small piece of non-porous, fabricated material sandwiched between two layers of porous separators, soaked in electrolytes and placed between the two electrodes.

The membrane works as a barrier in reducing the shuttling of dissolved polysulfides between anode and cathode, a process that increases the kind of cycle strain that has made the use of lithium-sulfur batteries for energy storage a challenge. The MCM still allows for the necessary movement of lithium ions, mimicking the process as it occurs in lithium-ion batteries. This novel membrane solution preserves the high-discharge rate capability and energy density without losing capacity over time. Related: The Discounts Are Over: U.S. Shale Is About To Get More Expensive

At various rates of discharge, the researchers found that the lithium-sulfur batteries that made use of MCM led to 100 percent capacity retention and had up to four times longer life compared to batteries without the membrane.

Narayan, senior author and professor of chemistry at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences said, “This advance removes one of the major technical barriers to the commercialization of the lithium-sulfur battery, allowing us to realize better options for energy efficiency. We can now focus our efforts on improving other parts of lithium-sulfur battery discharge and recharge that hurt the overall life cycle of the battery.”

Professor Narayan summed it up well. But left out the huge closing of the gap he and Moy have accomplished cutting the needed improvement from 10 to 20 times down to 3 to 5. The Lithium Sulfur technology may well soon be the better alternative.

By New Energy And Fuel

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • Dan on February 26 2017 said:
    Batteries are so toxic.
  • Mike Kom on February 26 2017 said:
    Why is it better? Is it cheaper, or something?
  • Alan on February 26 2017 said:
    Yes Dan, better use gasoline for toothpaste

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News