• 3 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 7 minutes Saudi and UAE pressure to get US support for Oil quotas is reportedly on..
  • 11 minutes China devalues currency to lower prices to address new tariffs. But doesn't help. Here is why. . . .
  • 15 minutes What is your current outlook as a day trader for WTI
  • 3 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 14 hours Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 2 days Movie Script: Epstein Guards Suspected Of Falsifying Logs
  • 20 hours In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 15 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 2 hours Continental Resource's Hamm (Trump Buddy) wants shale to cut production.Can't compete with peers. Stock will drop in half again.
  • 3 hours Gretta Thunbergs zero carbon voyage carbon foot print of carbon fibre manufacture
  • 1 day Significant: Boeing Delays Delivery Of Ultra-Long-Range Version Of 777X
  • 11 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 2 days I think I might be wrong about a 2020 shakeout
  • 2 days Kremlin Says WTO's Existence Would Be In Doubt If the U.S., Others Left
  • 52 days To be(lieve) or Not To be(lieve): U.S. Treasury Secretary Says U.S.-China Trade Deal Is 90% Done
  • 2 days Why Oil is Falling (including conspiracy theories and other fun stuff)
Alt Text

Can Oil Markets Withstand Recession Fears?

The trade war escalation combined…

Alt Text

Heat Wave Pushes Texas Power Demand To Record-High

Unusually high temperatures caused a…

Erwin Cifuentes

Erwin Cifuentes

Erwin Cifuentes is a Contributing Editor for Southern Pulse Info where he focuses on politics, economics and security issues in Latin America and the Caribbean.…

More Info

Premium Content

Mexico Made $3 Billion From Oil Hedging In 2016 – What is Their 2017 Strategy?

Mexico is about to reap at least US$3 billion this year based on its sovereign oil hedge after having received a record US$6.4 billion in 2015.

It is expected that the Mexican government will soon decide to continue hedging actions for 2017 in light of the low price of oil, and in order to maintain investor confidence. But are such actions a safe bet against potentially fluctuating oil prices, or is Mexico taking an unnecessary risk against possible gains in the future? And can Mexico learn any lessons from other states in Latin America and the Caribbean that have recently taken on a strategy of sovereign oil hedging?

For over a decade, Mexico’s government has paid for a hedge every year as part of one of the world’s biggest sovereign oil derivatives trade. The states received payouts in 1991 and 2009, but never during two consecutive years, though that will likely change for this year.

The Finance Ministry last December received a record amount for their sovereign oil hedge after having put options purchased in 2014 with an average price of US$76.40 per barrel. The record hedge was a major boost for public coffers in that it helped offset a shortfall in income from oil sales. (Legislators had approved the 2015 budget with an estimated price of $79 per barrel before global oil prices sank late last year).

The hedging agreement for 2016, which runs from 1 December of last year to 30 November, 2016, cost the state US$1.09 billion and guaranteed a price of US$49 per barrel. Since the beginning of the hedge period, the Mexican oil index that includes various domestic grades of crude has averaged US$32.40 a barrel. Per Bloomberg’s analysis, the government would make money even if the index of crude more than doubles to US$80 per barrel. Related: Why The Bear Market Could Be Over In A Flash

Despite the possible windfall for 2016, Mexican officials have yet to announce when they will make a decision concerning a possible 2017 hedge. This came as a surprise to some traders who were expecting a set date by last April following volatility in the West Texas Intermediate contract. In addition, some analysts believed it was in Mexico’s best interest to provide a date for hedging prior to market actions unfavorable for Mexico.

Along with hedging, the government under President Enrique Pena Nieto has typically enacted budget cuts in order to offset further revenue loss from the sale of oil. Last April the government announced at least US$9.3 billion in spending cuts and Finance Minister Luis Videgaray said hedging into 2017 would likely continue.

Since then, however, other factors have come into relevance aside from lower oil revenue. A further US1.6 billion will be cut in response to the impact of the Brexit, while domestic industrial production has also weakened. State-run oil giant Pemex, which finances roughly 20 percent of the federal budget, reported last month record low production and a fifteenth consecutive quarterly loss. As a result, the government may be swayed away from hedging and towards stronger budgetary restraint. Related: Six Weeks In A Row – Rising Rig Count Pushes Oil Down

“The Mexican government has done a good job at buying these put options because they have helped to smooth the transition of public finances towards lower oil prices, but it’s just breathing room,” said Carlos Capistran, chief Mexico economist at Bank of America to Bloomberg. “This buys the government time to think about the best way to go about expenditure cuts.”

On the other hand, Mexico could see the examples of several of its regional neighbors and decide to continue with hedging. In the case of Uruguay, for example, the country in June worked out a US$16 million deal with the World Bank to hedge oil. According to the World Bank, that decision arose in order to help shield Uruguay from the changes in the price of oil. Unlike Mexico, Uruguay is a net importer of oil, though the hedge came around from an important external factor: Venezuela halting the sale of oil to Uruguay around a year ago.

A more cautionary example of hedging occurred in Jamaica where the government hedged oil prices up to December 2016 at a price of US$66 per barrel. With the price of oil falling to less than half that rate last February, critics claimed that is has cost the state around US$20 million in earnings. Despite the opposition, Jamaican officials in June bought six hedging contracts from Citibank with the hope that oil prices could climb to as much as US$80 per barrel.

The window for oil hedging purchases by the Mexican government is usually between this month and September; thus, a decision to hedge or not for 2017 must be made very soon. Numerous factors, both domestic and international, must be considered in terms of hedging for next year. Hedging may not be the sure deal as it was for 2015, and possibly this year, but it remains to be seen which risk the Mexican government will opt for.

By Erwin Cifuentes for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play