• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 3 hours Iran Is Winning Big In The Middle East
  • 5 hours Trump cancels Denmark visit amid spat over sale of Greenland
  • 8 hours Nor Chicago, nor Detroit: Killings By Police Divide Rio De Janeiro Weary Of Crime
  • 6 hours Strong, the Strongest: Audi To Join Mercedes, BMW Development Alliance
  • 1 hour Not The Onion: Vivienne Westwood Says Greta Thunberg Should Run the World
  • 4 hours US to Drown the World in Oil
  • 1 day Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 9 hours With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
  • 7 hours Gretta Thunbergs zero carbon voyage carbon foot print of carbon fibre manufacture
  • 19 hours OPEC will consider all options. What options do they have ?
  • 1 day A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 2 hours Long Range Attack On Saudi Oil Field Ends War On Yemen
  • 24 hours What to tell my students
Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala is an American journalist based in Morocco. She completed her undergraduate coursework at the University of Texas at Austin (Hook’em) and reports on…

More Info

Premium Content

How Pipeline Contracts Are Crushing Some Producers

The contract model for oil pipeline space has some North American producers locked into high per-barrel transportation rates, while others benefit from steep discounts pedaled in bearish markets, a new report by Reuters says.

Traditionally, producers that sign a long-term contract with a major pipeline company, such as Plains All American or TransCanada Corp, receive a generous discount for their commitment. The pipeline company can then utilize said receivables as collateral to secure funding for new routes, creating a cycle of asset growth. Meanwhile, companies looking to use the pipelines only occasionally are charged a premium for their sporadic patronage.

But as pipeline companies scramble to sell unused capacity, the tables are turning, and long-term contracts are no longer the cheapest way to move oil.

"If I were a producer with a long-term contract, I would be very unhappy at the present time,” Rick Smead, managing director of advisory services at Houston-based RBN Energy told Reuters. “But, the reality is that when they (signed contracts), they were trapped.”

Since the oil price drop of 2014, pipeline companies have struggled to find producers willing to ship their goods at pre-crash price levels and at pre-crash volumes. Long-term contract rates for TransCanada’s 700,000 bpd Cushing-Marketlink Pipeline varied between $1.63 to $2.93 a barrel during normal market conditions. Occasional users paid $3 to use the line, which takes crude from storage facilities in Cushing, Oklahoma, to refiners in Texas.

Low demand from hemorrhaging production in 2015 meant pipelines were left empty, opening up opportunities to resell space allotted to contracted customers in a secondary market with rates at a 75 percent discount in some cases, traders said.

At the end of 2016, TransCanada’s corporate marketing department offered a tariff between 30 and 40 cents for Cushing-Marketlink, severely undercutting companies that set their rates in stone when barrel prices were soaring high. Related: The Offshore Boom To Break The OPEC Deal

As production in the Permian and Bakken formations recovers in 2017, traders say average tariffs have now stabilized at 80 to 90 cents per barrel. Even with the discounts, the pipeline often operates at below 70 percent capacity.

Companies from all parts of the oil and gas supply chain have had their bottom lines slashed due to the international supply glut now completing its third year. Right after the initial price drop in September, producers sought “efficiency gains” in operational costs, which often translated to just demanding lower fees from oilfield services companies.

Pipelines charge companies on a usage basis, so for producers, cutting those costs was easy. Shut down rigs, lower output and, ta da: transportation expenses plummet accordingly.

But the initial rush of off-the-cuff innovation and cost-cutting negotiations is running out of steam. The easy to drill, low-hanging fruit of the Permian has been plucked, analysts say.

"They definitely can't maintain the trajectory they're on," said Ben Shattuck, an analyst at Wood Mackenzie, according to the Houston Chronicle. "For a lot of these pad wells to work, you need those ultralow service prices, and that doesn't happen when you have more than 300 rigs in the Permian."

Oilfield services companies have started to hike up their prices in lockstep with the deployment of new rigs, especially in Texas. Pipeline companies should see their tariff tables rebalance accordingly, as producers return to the reliable and cost-effective transportation infrastructure. At the same time, if shale production rises higher, it could cause another price crash – which means this process starts all over again. Producers locked in on the pre-crash contracts will have no one to blame but themselves.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Bobby Saint on October 04 2017 said:
    Good article. You made a good point when you mentioned about long-term contracts no longer being the cheapest way to move oil. Sometimes, signing a long-term contract can both be an advantage and a disadvantage. If I were the producer, I would definitely look at all the pros and cons before signing an agreement.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play