• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 4 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 2 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 4 days China deletes leaked stats showing plunging birth rate for 2023
  • 5 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Premium Content

How Permanent Is The Coal Industry’s Bounce Back?

  • In recent years, as energy security has grown in importance, the coal industry rebounded rapidly - with some companies seeing their profits soar by as much as 60%.
  • While there is still plenty of money to be made in the coal industry, it is clear that the movement to divest from coal is picking up steam and its future is indeed uncertain.
  • While it is clear that reports of coals death were exaggerated, but the industry is certainly on course for a terminal decline.

Only recently written off as a sector in terminal decline, coal is raking in record profits. A perfect storm of factors stemming from the long arm of Covid-19, natural disasters affecting energy production, and the war in Ukraine turned energy war between Russia and the European Union provided a window for a coal renaissance that few could have predicted. Now, as markets stabilize and coal prices calm, the question is whether this surge was just a fluke in what will continue to be a downward trend for coal, or if it shows that the world’s dirtiest fossil fuel will be harder to kick than we thought. 

Against the backdrop of the European energy crisis and global energy insecurity of last year, some coal companies’ profits soared by as much as 60%. While the Russian war in Ukraine unveiled the relative importance and security of shying away from global energy supply chains in favor of bolstering domestic clean energy production, it also revealed that in times of energy volatility, coal is still king. Countries from Germany to China chose to fall back on coal, as a relatively cheap and abundant resource with plenty of existing production infrastructure. 

Many governments were reluctant to extend the life or ramp up the production of domestic coal plants, but felt that they had no choice but to choose to keep the lights on and avoid sending their constituents into energy poverty over meeting their climate pledges. Even as Germany ramped up its own coal production, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz publicly warned against allowing Russia’s war in Ukraine to lead to a “worldwide renaissance” for coal. 

The coal sector is currently full of such contradictions and dualities. Now, as coal profits are higher than ever and production has spiked along with prices, pressure to phase out coal is also ramping up. And it looks like big banks are finally getting serious about divesting from coal, even when there is clearly still plenty of money to be made. It’s not unusual for big banks and financial firms to pay considerable lip service to defunding coal, but seeing it actually happen is something of a rarity. 

Last year, CNN reported that the banking industry was characterized by a sweeping culture of greenwashing, as exemplified by “a ‘massive disconnect’ between the green rhetoric of the largest financial institutions, their climate commitments and net zero pledges, and their actual financing practices when it comes to new fossil fuel development.” At the time of that report, published in April of 2022, coal power generation was at an all-time high worldwide, a record that was beaten repeatedly in the months after. 

But now, “financiers' move away from coal is accelerating,” according to reporting from Reuters. This assertion is based on recent findings from the  Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), which has “reviewed the formal coal exit policies of financial institutions including commercial banks, global asset managers, insurance and reinsurance companies, pension funds, central banks, development lenders and others,” and – for once – has found some good news to report. More than 200 banks and insurers around the world now have policies that restrict investment in coal – a twofold increase since April 2019.

This notable acceleration in financial firms’ decision to withdraw support from coal is great news for the climate. Just this year, a study from Harvard Business School found that pulling funding from coal is even more effective than previously thought. The recently released report asked the question “Can Finance Save the World?” and decided that, yes. Yes, it can. “What we found in this case is that banks divesting from coal directly leads to real impact—more than anyone thought,” said report author Boris Vallée. “This means that the financial effects translate into environmental effects. By reducing capital expenditures, facilities are decommissioned, and CO2 emissions ultimately fall, as any alternative source of energy is less carbon-intensive.”

While coal may have had a killer year in 2023, it doesn’t seem that its comeback can continue for long. As investing dollars dry up, it seems that coal really and truly will go the way of the dodo. It won’t happen overnight, to be certain, but perhaps reports of terminal decline were not greatly exaggerated, after all. 

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com


More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News