• 3 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 19 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 12 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 1 hour EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 4 hours US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 47 mins The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 12 hours Petrol versus EV
  • 6 hours OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 36 mins Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 3 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 8 hours 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
  • 1 hour Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 17 hours E-mopeds
  • 4 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 7 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 1 day These are the world’s most competitive economies: US No. 1
Alt Text

US Demands For More Oil Could Backfire

The State Department’s request for…

Andy Tully

Andy Tully

Andy Tully is a veteran news reporter who is now the news editor for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

‘Green’ Oil Refinery Planned For Canada’s Pacific Coast

‘Green’ Oil Refinery Planned For Canada’s Pacific Coast

Not all of Canada’s oil sands are destined for the proposed – and much disputed – Keystone XL pipeline through the United States.

Energy start-up Pacific Energy Future Corp. hopes to build a new, environmentally friendly oil refinery on the northwestern coast of British Columbia. It’s the second new refinery proposed for the country’s Pacific Coast to refine and export the huge amounts of oil in the sands of Alberta. Samer Salameh, the executive chairman of Pacific Energy Future, says the refinery, which is estimated to cost $10 billion to build, could be processing up to 1 million barrels of crude a day in about seven years.

The Canadian government is expected to decide soon whether approve another plan, from Enbridge Inc., to build a pipeline that would ship 525,000 barrels a day of Alberta oil to a coastal refinery in Kitimat, BC. But the Northern Gateway pipeline is strongly opposed by environmental and First Nations native groups who fear it could lead to disastrous oil spill in the Pacific.

Pacific Energy Future’s approach is different. While Enbridge’s proposal would ship unprocessed oil sand, also known as “dilbit,” to its customers, Salameh said he plans to ship only refined oils to customers, primarily in Asia, lessening the risk of damage to the ocean.

Related Article: Canadian Oil sands Are Filthy, But Canada Doesn’t Care

“I think everybody knows that it’s in Canada’s strategic national interest to increase and diversify oil production into Asia,” he said. “But I think everybody in their heart knows that shipping this dilbit is not the answer.”

“We think that’s not the right thing to do by the environment, it’s not the right thing to do by First Nations and it’s not the right thing to do by the B.C. People,” Salameh said, adding, “This is a solution to everybody’s problem.”

Not necessarily. Opponents of the Enbridge plan say they’re not completely sold on Pacific Energy Future’s plan either. According to Greepeace’s Mike Hudema, “The people of BC and over 130 First Nations … do not want tar sands in liquid or refined form coming through their traditional territories because of the risk to their communities and the environment.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News