• 8 minutes U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 13 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 16 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 6 hours Knoema: Crude Oil Price Forecast: 2018, 2019 and Long Term to 2030
  • 14 hours Nuclear Pact/Cold War: Moscow Wants U.S. To Explain Planned Exit From Arms Treaty
  • 2 hours Merkel Aims To Ward Off Diesel Car Ban In Germany
  • 14 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 13 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 6 hours Get on Those Bicycles to Save the World
  • 10 hours Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 1 day Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 1 day Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 1 day Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 21 hours Long-Awaited Slowdown in China Exports Still Isn’t Happening
  • 8 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 24 hours Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
Alt Text

China’s CNPC Boosts Global Oil, Gas Ties

China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)…

Alt Text

Hurricane Michael’s Impact On Gasoline Demand

Hurricane Michael had a significant…

Alt Text

Are Energy Majors Under Threat From Big Tech?

Audi and Amazon have teamed…

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala is an American journalist based in Morocco. She completed her undergraduate coursework at the University of Texas at Austin (Hook’em) and reports on…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Clinton Campaign Pledges to Raise Fed Royalties for Oil Companies

Companies extracting oil, gas and coal from U.S. federal lands will see royalties due to the government increase if Hillary Clinton becomes the country’s next president, the candidate’s campaign said.

The current 12.5-percent rate would be raised to be in line with the 16 percent to almost 19 percent that some states already impose, in a promised move the Clinton campaign described as only “fair”.

Beyond that, Clinton would also determine new oil leasing on federal lands based on how fast renewable energy is developing—presumably to ensure that renewables outpace oil and gas. In other words, renewables would be given preference on federal lands.

It goes far beyond what President Barack Obama has done. Related: The U.S. Might Soon Lose Its No.1 Position In Petroleum Production

Clinton has discussed similar policy changes in the past, but this is the first time she has provided specific details of the proposal.

Environmental groups had been lobbying the likely Democratic nominee to ban all fossil fuel production on federal land in order to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

On the Republican side, Donald Trump had made increasing oil and natural gas production on federal lands a centerpiece of his energy platform. He claims the move would release $50 trillion worth of “untapped” energy supplies into global markets and create sizable revenues for the federal government.

Trump’s plans also including removing regulatory obstructions in leasing lands for drilling purposes and revoking renewable energy subsidies.

Clinton’s plan would increase renewable energy production on government lands tenfold over the next decade, which she plans to implement by expediting the permit process for up and coming renewable energy projects. Military bases would also begin using more green energy. Related: BP Oil Cargoes in Limbo at Terminal as Venezuela Can’t Pay its Bills

The Natural Resources Defense Council endorsed Hillary Clinton on Wednesday, marking its first political endorsement in a presidential election, according to The Washington Post.

“Hillary Clinton is an environmental champion with the passion, experience and savvy to build on President Obama’s environmental legacy,” the group said in a statement. “More than any other candidate running, Hillary Clinton understands the environmental challenges America faces, and her approach to solving them is grounded in the possibility and promise our democracy affords us.”

Earlier this year, the Obama administration started a three-year moratorium on new leases for coal production on federal lands. In the meantime, the Department of the Interior will determine whether or not royalty rates will increase in order to make up for the environmental disadvantages of coal production.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • BrentDenver on June 02 2016 said:
    The Feds are not issuing leases of any significance anyway. "Make America Weak" Oil royalties are the least of our worries.
  • Kris h on June 04 2016 said:
    Raise rates and chase off more taxable business , soo smart these dems.
  • Cowboy on June 07 2016 said:
    Way to leave Sanders completely out of the story.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News