• 55 mins Nigeria Files Suit Against JPMorgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 8 hours Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 13 hours Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 17 hours Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 19 hours Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 21 hours OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 24 hours Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 1 day Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 2 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 2 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 2 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 2 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 2 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 2 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 2 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 2 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 3 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 3 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 3 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 3 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 3 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 3 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 3 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 4 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 4 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 4 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 4 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 4 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 4 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 4 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 7 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 7 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 7 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 7 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 7 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 7 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 7 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 8 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
Alt Text

Europe Becomes Victim of Russia’s Newest Oil Strategy

Rising shipments of Russian crude…

Alt Text

$70 Oil Cripples European Refiners

The surge in oil prices…

Alt Text

The Biggest Loser Of The OPEC Deal

The OPEC production cut deal…

Would Regulated Oil Prices, Argentine-Style, Help U.S. Shale?

Pipeline Rigs

U.S. shale oil companies are filing for bankruptcy at an alarming rate, whereas, their counterparts in Argentina are having a gala time. When the U.S. shale oil drillers were struggling to earn $39 per barrel of oil, Argentina was offering $67.5 per barrel to their producers.

Due to the oil price crash, the world’s capital spending in oil and gas has reduced by approximately 20 percent in 2015. By comparison, U.S. oil and gas companies have reduced spending by 40 percent last year, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

On the other hand, Argentina’s state-run oil company YPF increased spending by only 4 percent during the same period.

Is this model of regulated oil prices in Argentina replicable in the U.S.?

Though this seems to be a good solution, this is not sustainable or beneficial in the long-term. Related: Wells Fargo Reduces 66% of Credit Lines to Oil and Gas Players

Prior to 2014, when oil prices were high, the cost of U.S. shale oil production was estimated to be between $70-$90/b, according to different analysts. But when crude prices declined, shale oil producers were forced to innovate and reduce costs, which has decreased the cost of production to $60/b in the third quarter of 2015.

As the oil prices continued to drop further, shale drillers continued to modernize, further reducing the cost of production in 2016.

Along with the technological advances, the productivity of the companies has also increased. They are utilizing their manpower wisely and funds prudently.

The world is recognizing the need for cleaner fuels and a preference to move away from fossil fuels. Hence, there are many experts who believe that oil prices are unlikely to touch $100/b again.

On the other hand, the biggest oil trading company, Vitol, has forecast a likely range of $40-$60/b for the next decade. Had the U.S. protected the shale oil producers, they would not have taken steps to cut costs.

The high prices paid to the oil companies in Argentina is borne by the consumers. Such a practice in the U.S. would have reduced the disposable income available to American households. Related: Why Cheap Shale Gas Will End Soon

“It may not have a huge effect on the top 10 percent of households, but if you’re earning $30,000 or $40,000 a year and drive to work, this is a big deal,” said Guy Berger, United States economist at RBS back in January 2015, when crude prices were close to the current prices of $49/b.

Now that the shale oil drillers have considerably reduced production costs, if crude oil prices rise even to $60-$70/b, they will reap windfall profits. Their longevity has increased, and they are here to stay.

As a result, following Argentina’s approach is not long-term positive for the industry. U.S. shale oil companies have drastically cut costs in order to survive, ensuring that they will be competitive over the long-term.

By Rakesh Upadhyay of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • R. J. Spoley on May 26 2016 said:
    As usual, the analysis is lopsided in looking at the problem from only one perspective. Money handling. First, better than 33% of the "oil" from "shale wells" is greater than 50 API. Not good for making gasoline much less diesel. Secondly, "shale wells" only hold the zone they are completed in, thus no work overs or recompletions and no stacked reservoirs. What you see, is what you get, and in this case, it's very short term. By the way, you really don't get to "see" your reservoir as these wells are not logged "horizontally". Also, try pumping a " horizontal" well. Lots of luck. Once the gas energy source declines the show is over. Sorry. Reserves? Your kidding. Porosities of 5-8 % and 90% water saturation and recovering less than 20% of the "in place" reserves. The list goes on. This is all very short term thinking. Large vertically integrated oil companies usually require 10 years to "first oil" and it's getting worse with all the global unrest going on. The American E&P industry, along with OPEC has always been about regulating production because oil & gas are a commodity. Too much causes a price crash and producers go out of business which causes a shortage resulting in a price spike. All governments control commodities on both the up and down sides with production/price sideboards. This has stabilized agriculture worldwide. Now this guy wants to eliminate these controls and create chaos. Get a life! We wouldn't be in the fix we're in now if proration rules had been adhered to!
  • The Donald on May 26 2016 said:
    How much does it cost the American economy to protect Americans against terrorists? They are funded by oil sales to the USA. If we produced more oil at home the prices of OPEC oil would drop even more and they would have less money to do harm around the world. So yes we should protect our domestic producers from extreme swings in price that are caused by external forces such as Saudi Arabia flooding the market. Therefore, the author needs to either get a brain or use the education in a manner that will help the American economy. I thought Hillary was dumb but there are people even dumber.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News