• 2 minutes California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 6 minutes China and India are both needing more coal and prices are now extremely high. They need maximum fossil fuel.
  • 11 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 12 mins GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 15 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 1 hour Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.
  • 19 hours Did China cherry-pick the factors that affected the economic slow-down?
  • 20 hours "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 20 hours Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 3 days U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 4 days Nord Stream - US/German consultations
  • 3 mins NordStream2
  • 410 days Class Act: Bet You've Never Seen A President Do This.
  • 6 days An Indian Opinion on What is Going on in China
  • 3 days Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 3 days Australia sues Neoen for lack of power from its Tesla battery
  • 6 days "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
Biden Administration Begs OPEC For More Oil

Biden Administration Begs OPEC For More Oil

The Biden administration is not…

Saudi Arabia: Patience Is A Virtue In Oil Markets

Saudi Arabia: Patience Is A Virtue In Oil Markets

Saudi Arabia appears confident that…

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…

More Info

Premium Content

With Friends Like Moscow, Who Needs Venezuela's Oil?

Venezuela said it was ready to welcome a Russian energy company into the giant Orinoco oil belt, solidifying a relationship propped up by a multi-million investment from Moscow last year. Both sides announced recently they'd starting working through a Caracas-controlled joint venture in a 21,000-square-mile section of the vast oil reserve. When the Iranian president paid a visit to the region, House Republicans cried foul over the "tour of tyrants" though Russia's relationship with Caracas barely makes headlines. While Moscow is certainly no Tehran, it's certainly no beacon of democracy either.  With Caracas sitting atop OPEC in terms of reserves, lawmakers should put aside their grievances in favor of a grand assessment of U.S. energy security.

Caracas in 2007 said international oil companies working in the Orinoco belt need to be minority partners to work there. The region holds more than 500 billion barrels of technically recoverable reserves, making it host to one of the largest known oil deposits in the world.  Caracas approved of a joint venture between state-run oil company Petroleos de Venezuela, or PDVSA, and a regional subsidiary of Russia's Gazprom, which would hold a minority stake with 40 percent. Last year, Moscow paid around half of the $1 billion needed to help develop oil in Venezuela.

Caracas said recently there's no way it would privatize PDVSA, which makes it a natural partner for a company like Gazprom, which also likes to gobble up other companies. U.S. supermajor Exxon Mobil is locked in a court battle with Caracas over the terms of the 2007 decision on joint ventures, though the joint venture requirement did little to discourage Russian energy companies from tapping into Venezuela's vast oil reserves. And why should it? Caracas tops the OPEC ranks and agreeing to their terms simply makes good business sense.

When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad toured Latin America last month, he said his Western adversaries should no longer consider the region their "back yard." Before he arrived, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., chairwoman of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Ahmadinejad's visit was a "tour of tyrants," a tour that included talks with the likes of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and the Castro brothers in Cuba. So why are there no complaints about Moscow's ambitions in the "back yard" of the United States?

Political issues with regional visits by U.S. adversaries shouldn't interfere in broader issues over energy. It's duplicitous for lawmakers like Ros-Lehtinen to complain when Tehran courts U.S. adversaries in Latin America but remain silent when entities from another government do the same. Russian energy companies, no matter how you cut it, are taking a significant stake in the some of the largest oil reserves in the world. If U.S. energy security is truly an international issue, than policy decisions should be based on pragmatism not grievances against a particular government.

By. Daniel J. Graeber of Oilprice.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Fred Banks on February 15 2012 said:
    I'll gladly be the first to comment on this article, which might be described as a tempest in a teapot.

    The oil under discussion is probably HEAVY OIL, and I really and truly dont believe that if it is heavy oil, the Russian oil people/experts will be able to do something that American oil people/experts were unable to do.

    Russia's relationship with Caracas is hardly worth mentioning except in conversations where the other principal topic is Brad Pitt, and as for Russia not being a "beacon of democracy", I say better Putin or Medvedev than George W. Bush.
  • anonymous on February 15 2012 said:
    Oh yeah, the hypocrisy of politics has no bounds when it comes to democracy. Remember its their way or the highway.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News