• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 2 hours Oil prices going down
  • 19 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 6 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 2 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 19 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 15 mins Sell out now or hold on?
  • 2 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 49 mins Oil and Trade War
  • 18 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 17 hours The Permian Mystery
  • 11 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 12 hours No LNG Pipelines? Let the Trucks Roll In
  • 2 hours Geopolitical and Political Risks make their strong comeback to global oil and gas markets
  • 6 hours Australia mulls LNG import
  • 2 days When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 2 days Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge

The leading economics blog online covering financial issues, geopolitics and trading.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Trump Angers Buffett – To Sign Executive Orders On Keystone, Dakota Pipelines

Trump Oval Office

It is just day two of his presidency, and already Trump is taking a sledgehammer to the Obama legacy: in his latest move reported moments ago by Bloomberg, president Trump intends to sign two executive actions today that would advance construction of the controversial Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, putting a spoke, so to say, in the train wheels of Warren Buffett's train-based oil transportation quasi-monopoly.

(Click to enlarge)

The orders would fulfill campaign promises Trump made to approve both pipelines, which face strong opposition from Democrats and environmentalists, but ardent support from the oil industry and the GOP. The White House said Trump plans to sign executive orders at 11 a.m. Tuesday morning, but did not provide more details, nor did it respond to the Bloomberg report.

It’s unclear what exactly the orders would do and whether they would fully approve the pipelines or take some other steps in that direction.

If fully built by developer TransCanada Corp., Keystone would run from Alberta, Canada’s oil sands to the Gulf Coast in Texas, bringing heavy oil sands petroleum to refineries. Last month, the Obama administration ordered a comprehensive environmental impact statement to be conducted on the Dakota Access Pipeline before any decision could be made on building its final section below Lake Oahe in North Dakota.

Dakota Access has been the subject of internationally recognized protests that have fired up environmentalists and indigenous rights activists. They say that the pipeline threatens the water supply of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, and further development of oil infrastructure threatens the climate.

More details from Bloomberg:

Keystone was rejected under former President Barack Obama. Trump’s move on Energy Transfer Partners LP’s 1,172-mile Dakota Access project aims to end a standoff that has stalled the $3.8 billion project since September, when the Obama administration halted work on land near Lake Oahe in North Dakota. Related: Does Trump’s ‘America First’ Tax Plan Benefit Oil & Gas?

The moves, taken on Trump’s fourth full day in office, mark a major departure from the Obama administration’s handling of the controversial oil pipelines. The steps vividly illustrate Trump’s plan to give the oil industry more freedom to expand infrastructure and ease transportation bottlenecks.

The two projects require different approvals. Keystone needs a presidential permit to build across the Canadian border, while Dakota Access, developed by Energy Transfer Partners, needs an Army Corps of Engineers easement to build under Lake Oahe.

Expect an angry reaction from Buffett, which will promptly flow through to funded environmental protest groups, who will double down in their defense of the two pipelines, of which the Dakota Access was the prominent center of media attention in the waning days of Obama's presidency.

By Zerohedge

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Synapsid on January 24 2017 said:
    Funded environmental protest groups will double down in their defense of the two pipelines, according to Zerohedge. Pause to consider.

    The Keystone pipeline has been carrying oil since January 2010, I believe it was. The Keystone XL pipeline is the one that the previous administration stopped, but only the northern part of it. The southern part was completed a couple of years ago and has been carrying crude oil to refineries on the Gulf Coast. President Obama stood in a pipe yard at Cushing, Oklahoma, and called it vital for the US economy.
  • maa180 on January 24 2017 said:
    "media attention in the waning days of Trump's presidency."

    You meant to say Obama.

    Also going after Buffett on this one is a little dated. That was so 2015 and Keystone. He has a large interest in Kinder and a portion of the DAPL through Phillips 66. He is hedging his bets on the oil tanker business, which saw a dramatic decline in 2015 with Bakken crude by rail. No one saw the crude by rail being a permanent business, especially Buffett.
  • petergrt on January 25 2017 said:
    Here comes the independence from OPEC - oil heading to $35 soon.
  • Dan on January 27 2017 said:
    Uncle Warren? The greatest investor of all time? "Hey buddy, here's the presidency, after you shut down pipelines you get 3 homes after you leave. All on President pay. Looks like speaker Ryan doesn't know which way is up now that he has to pay for that fence in front of his D.C. mansion. Go Trump, go !! We love you !

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News