• 11 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 13 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 15 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 16 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 17 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 18 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 20 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 21 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 23 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 24 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 1 day Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 1 day British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Who Are The Biggest Buyers Of U.S. Oil?

Exports of U.S. petroleum and…

Alt Text

Is The Bakken Profitable At $50 Oil?

The Bakken remains the second…

Oil’s Irreplaceable Role in the Global Energy economy

Oil’s Irreplaceable Role in the Global Energy economy

Back in 2006, George W. Bush declared that the US is “addicted to oil.” Since then, that phrase has been repeated ad nauseum by politicos on both the Left and the Right. But on Tuesday night, President Obama took the addiction meme to an entirely new level of inanity by saying “For decades, we’ve talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels.”

That sentence may cheer campaigners working for Greenpeace, but it demonstrates both the extreme poverty of our energy discussions and our politicians’ refusal to acknowledge the essential role that hydrocarbons play in the global economy.

By using the word “addiction” Obama implies that our consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas is somehow dirty, that we lack self-control, self-respect, or that we are somehow diseased. And of course, just as the recovering addict becomes a new man/woman, the America that frees itself from the evils of hydrocarbons will be made stronger and more employable. “The transition to clean energy,” Obama said, “has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of jobs.”

But forget about the president’s choice of words and consider, for just a moment, the math: nine out of ten units of energy consumed in the US and the rest of the world come from fossil fuels. On an average day, US consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas amounts to 41 million barrels of oil equivalent. That’s equal to the average daily oil output of five Saudi Arabias. Where will the US find such a huge amount of energy – and all of it carbon-free? Obama didn’t have that answer. Instead, he vaguely referred to the “scientists and researchers” who are “discovering clean energy technologies that someday will lead to entire new industries.”

That might be true – someday -- but entrepreneurs have been searching for a replacement for oil for decades. Despite many billions of dollars in investment, nothing comes close to oil in terms of flexibility, cost, or convenience. Despite that long history of failure to find a replacement for oil, Obama is now claiming that we not only need to replace oil, but we need to replace natural gas and coal, too. And he made that claim without ever using the words “global warming” or “carbon dioxide.”

Obama’s speech on Tuesday night revealed a political agenda that aims to use the blowout in the Gulf of Mexico as a rationale to pass an energy bill through Congress that includes some form of cap-and-trade that will increase consumers’ energy costs. Where’s the popular appeal for such an energy tax? There is none, not at a time when the US unemployment rate is near 10 percent and one in seven American homeowners with a mortgage is either delinquent or facing foreclosure.

Even more surprising (and disappointing) in Obama’s speech was the fact that he used the phrase “clean energy” six times, but did not once mention the fuels of the future: natural gas and nuclear. That’s a stunning omission given that those two sources offer the best near-term, low- or no-carbon options for the US and the rest of the world.

Obama’s speech reveals a president who is under intense political pressure to do something, anything, so that he can appear to be in control of a blowout that the government is incapable of stopping on its own. Rather than admit that the government must rely on BP to stop the blowout, rather than acknowledge the irreplaceable role that hydrocarbons play in the global energy economy, he fell back onto the hackneyed claim about “addiction.” Here’s the reality: we are not addicted to oil. Nor are we addicted to fossil fuels. We are addicted to prosperity.

By. Robert Bryce




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on June 19 2010 said:
    Not long ago I visited a whaling museum. Once upon a time we would have been told whale products are irreplaceable, yet they where replaced. One day we will see a similar museum for oil. We will see it because we must, oil demand will quickly outstrip supply as the recovery gains steam. Yes a higher oil price will bring more oil exploration, but even at todays prices an electric car powered by solar and wind is cheaper to drive than a gasoline powered car. $200+/barrel will hasten this transition, at some point oil prices will again drop simply because the economy has moved off of it. Sadly it takes far more regulatory run around to place a solar plant than it does an oil platform. As oil prices surge I believe we will also see expedited approvals for wind and solar, as has always been the case for oil.
  • Anonymous on June 19 2010 said:
    Robert Bryce...your so funny !!.. despite your leak of imagination...maybe you should be cited in this future museum Larry is speaking of...you really seem to believe what you say.....your lucky !!!.. isn't the opposite obviously the case ?..do you believe you have the means to predict technical evolution ?... you may have interest to explain the reasons of your motivation... you may gain credibility....
  • Anonymous on June 19 2010 said:
    I agree, but even more scary is the lack of action and usage of all the people-power waiting to help on all fronts. Saudi Arabia apparently had a very bad oil spill (1980's?) in the Persian Gulph and used huge tankers to suck it up until they could figure out what to do. A retired engneer from that spill has offered his expertise and is being stonewalled by BP and the feds. What's up with this, is it ego preventing them from asking the Saudi's for help. If there was a fire next door threatening the whole neighbourhood, fire stations from all areas would be right there helping. This spill will affect the ENTIRE Atlantic coast and more. Perhaps a much scarier consiracy (bildenberg?) is at hand. Obama is not studid, but who and what is tying his hands right now???
  • Anonymous on June 20 2010 said:
    Okay. Enough with this oil shit.70% of all oil production goes to power cars and trucks. Another 10% goes to the airline industry.The vast majority of people travel less than 40 miles a day.It would take no more than 40 square miles of wall-to-wall solar panels, deployed in arizona, to power 200 million small cars and trucks for America. That's leaves us plenty of time to figure what to do with the remaining 30% of oil production.Give me a break.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News