• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 34 mins A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 6 hours Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 7 hours Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 3 hours Used Thin Film Solar Panels at 15 Cents per Watt
  • 7 hours China has invested btw $30 - $40 Billon in Canadian Oil Sands. Trump should put 10% tariffs on all Chinese oil exported into or thru U.S. in which Chinese companies have invested .
  • 14 hours US Shale Economic Impact: GDP gain realized in shale boom’s first 10 years
  • 2 hours IS ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST WAR REQUIRED TO BOLSTER THE OIL PRICE
  • 14 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 20 hours It's Not the Job of the Government to Dictate Where Businesses Should Go
  • 20 hours Offshore subsea sub 50$/bbl : Rystad Energy: High stakes in store for subsea markets if oil falls to $50/bbl
  • 17 hours Philadelphia Energy Solutions seeks to permanently shut oil refinery - sources
  • 18 hours Tit For Tat: China Strikes Back In Trade Dispute With U.S. With New Tariffs
  • 13 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 12 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing for news outlets such as iNVEZZ and SeeNews. 

More Info

Premium Content

Has Big Oil Bought Into The Oil Price Recovery?

Since oil prices recovered to over US$50 per barrel, analysts have started calling the bottom of the investment cycle in the oil industry. But while many U.S. onshore drillers are planning to increase capital budgets for this year, oil supermajors continue to be cautiously waiting to see where oil prices would go with the OPEC supply-cut deal and expected rebalancing of supply and demand.

The diverging paths that Big Oil and smaller U.S. shale-focused companies are planning in terms of capital expenditure this year is not just the fact that investment amounts are incomparable: dozens of billions of dollars vs. a couple of hundred million dollars. The different routes ahead for those two groups of companies are the result of starkly distinct financial and production growth priorities and the fundamental difference of the projects the firms have been undertaking for years.

U.S. shale drillers – which are emerging from the downturn leaner and fitter – are more flexible with adjusting spend to oil prices than the supermajors, most of which have invested in costly mega projects when they were comfortably planning spending at oil prices at $100 per barrel. Those highly capital-intensive mega projects are not quickly launched, stopped or re-launched.

According to a recent analysis by Wood Mackenzie, the U.S. Independents will respond first to the rising oil prices and could raise investment by more than 25 percent this year if oil prices average above US$50. The independents have three key competitive advantages: access to capital; cost-advantaged portfolios; and flexibility to scale back spend sharply if prices stay low. Oil majors, on the other hand, would continue to cut back spending, and their total investment this year is seen down by some 8 percent as recent capital-intensive projects wind down, Wood Mac reckons.

Case in point, in the U.S., Hess Corporation is raising its 2017 E&P capital and exploratory budget to US$2.25 billion from the 2016 spend of US$1.9 billion. Although part of the budget would go to projects in Guyana and Norway, Hess plans US$700 million investment in unconventionals, chiefly to increase from two rigs to six rigs by the end of 2017 and to bring online around 75 new wells in the Bakken in North Dakota.

Midland, Texas-based Diamondback Energy – which operates in the Permian Basin – increased in December its 2017 capex guidance to a range of US$700-US$900 million from a previous range of US$500-US$650 million. Related: The Oil War Is Only Just Getting Started

However, Wood Mackenzie chief analyst Simon Flowers has recently said:

“Enthusiasm is less overt outside the L48 – in fact some international independents plan to cut budgets further in 2017 to rebuild finances.”

It’s the rebuilding of finances that is the top priority for Big Oil now. They have been trying to stem the cash flow bleeding amid the low oil prices, and have amassed huge debts in order to maintain – and in some cases raise – dividends to keep shareholders happy. The recovery of oil prices, coupled with deep spending cuts, has recently improved the cash flow position for many of the oil majors, and they may not even have to resort to more borrowing to cover the coveted dividends.

This is not a reason for boosting spending right now, though.

Referring to capex increase, BP CEO Bob Dudley said in an interview with Bloomberg in Davos last month that the UK oil major will “keep the discipline under US$17 billion, like last year, this year and the year after, and then, after that, we’ll see”. Of course, he was explicit on how shareholders feel about dividends: “They really want it, there’s not question about it; they really want it”.

Chevron has said it would spend US$19.8 billion this year, down 42 percent on 2015 and at least 15 percent lower than outlays for 2016. Shell said on Thursday it would be investing US$25 billion this year, compared to 2016 organic capital investment of US$26.9 billion.

One notable exception from Big Oil’s investment plans is ExxonMobil, which said in its earnings call presentation earlier this week that it anticipates 2017 capex at around US$22 billion, compared to US$19.3 billion spent in 2016. Exxon is betting big on the Permian after more than doubling its acreage in the superstar shale area earlier this month. Related: Oil Prices Stuck In Narrow Band, Capped By U.S. Shale Threat

But Exxon’s is certainly not the general feeling within Big Oil ranks.

Commenting on the supermajors spending budgets, Gianna Bern, a former trader for BP who teaches finance at the University of Notre Dame, told The Wall Street Journal:

“The sector became a victim of its own success, bringing about the crash in crude oil prices, so the big players want to avoid doing that again.”

So in the near term Big Oil will continue to exert caution in spending plans while trying to shore up cash flows to strengthen balance sheets, and of course, keep shareholders happy with continuous steady flows of dividends.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Bud on February 02 2017 said:
    The lower 48 market is bifurcated between the large firms operating close to free cash flow post CAPEX, finance & dividends, and the smaller firms still raising equity capital in an effort to get exposure to the Permian with the cash hoping that this lipstick will get them bought.

    The larger firms already have decades of inventory and know the costs in the Permian will get bid up and slim the irr delta with bakken or eagleford.
    A fund with even 10b cannot use the math Exxon uses. Exxon is in a 30 year not 3 year game.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play