• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 12 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 1 day US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 6 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 10 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 18 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 2 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 1 day OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 6 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 1 day Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 20 hours 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 1 day A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 2 days 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
  • 52 mins The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
Alt Text

High Prices Benefit Iran Despite Lost Oil Exports

Iranian Vice President Eshaq Jahagiri…

Alt Text

Large Crude Build Forces Oil Prices Lower

Oil prices slipped on Wednesday…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Crude By Rail Falling Out Of Favor

Crude By Rail Falling Out Of Favor

Crude-by-rail is no longer growing like gangbusters.

The number of shipments for crude oil on North America’s railways surged in recent years from previously negligible levels. As oil gushed from the Bakken and pipelines couldn’t keep up, the industry scrambled to fill every train car possible with oil, shipping it to U.S. refineries on the East Coast and Gulf of Mexico. Related: Peak Oil: Myth Or Coming Reality?

The phenomenon was growing so fast that safety mechanisms could not keep up. A spate of derailments and explosions led to criticisms of the U.S. federal government that it was not imposing enough safeguards. That led to federal regulations this spring intended to make shipping crude less dangerous.

But now, after years of explosive growth, shipping crude by rail has suddenly fallen out of favor. There are a few reasons for this.

First, pipeline construction is finally catching up. Moving crude by pipeline is much cheaper than rail – essentially $12 per barrel via pipeline versus $24 per barrel on the railways. As pipelines come online, rail looks comparatively more expensive. Related: The Dark Side Of The Shale Bust

Related to that is the fact that certain grades of crude that traded at a discount relative to the larger benchmarks like WTI are starting to see their prices rise as they gain more access to markets. For example, Western Canada Select traded at a discount because of a dearth of pipeline capacity, which meant shipping it by rail made sense. But the discount Western Canadian oil has traded for has narrowed (because of more pipelines), making rail shipments no longer cost effective.

Furthermore, oil production is starting to level off, putting less pressure on the existing pipelines. North Dakota saw its output peak in December 2014, and it has ticked down since then. With production slowing, there is less of a need for rail. Related: Oil Markets Could Be In For A Shock From China Soon

Overall, oil moving from Canada to the U.S. by rail fell by 28 percent in the first quarter of this year. That is bad news for U.S. rail shipper BNSF, which hopes to see a recovery in shipments after they dropped from a record high of 17,074 carloads in December down to just 13,000 in March. BNSF’s executive chairman spoke at the EIA’s annual conference in Washington DC on June 15, and said that the recent rebound in oil prices could lead drillers to begin completing wells that they have been holding onto. As those wells are completed, more supplies will lead to more shipments.

But for now, crude by rail is no longer growing like it once was.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News