• 2 hours Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 4 hours Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 6 hours OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 9 hours Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 10 hours Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 11 hours Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 1 day API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 1 day Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 1 day EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 1 day IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 1 day Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 1 day Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 1 day Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 1 day Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 2 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 2 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 2 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 2 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 2 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 2 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 2 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 3 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 3 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 3 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 3 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 3 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 3 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 3 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 3 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 6 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 6 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 6 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 6 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 6 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 6 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 6 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 7 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
  • 7 days Residents Flee After Nigeria Gas Company Pipeline Explodes
  • 7 days Venezuela To Pre-Mine Petro For Release In 6-Weeks
  • 7 days Trump Says U.S. “Could Conceivably” Rejoin Paris Climate Accord
Alt Text

Overcoming Wind Energy’s Biggest Obstacle

New research suggests that smaller,…

Alt Text

Microsoft, Google Turn To Wind Energy

Wind major Vattenfall has just…

Wind Could Meet 20% Of U.S. Electricity By 2030

Wind Could Meet 20% Of U.S. Electricity By 2030

Wind power may soon be coming to a field near you.

The Department of Energy (DOE) published a major report looking at the viability of scaling up wind power in the United States. Wind power now makes up 4.5 percent of electricity generation in the United States, with 65 gigawatts located across 39 states.

But DOE concluded that ramping up wind to meet 20 percent of the nation’s electricity generation by 2030 and 35 percent by 2050 is not only eminently doable, but would also provide a variety of economic benefits. Related: No Country For King Coal – The Changing U.S. Energy Mix

Doubters of wind power – and renewables in general – cite a litany of reasons for why renewables cannot meet the needs of a modern 21st century industrial economy. Opponents argue that wind is too expensive and will raise electricity rates, or that the wind does not blow all the time, or that it cannot power heavy manufacturing.

The Energy Department conducted an economic study that looked at what would happen if wind power captured a rising share of the electric power market. And it concluded that wind passes all the necessary tests. First, it may only contribute to a 1 percent increase in electricity rates over the next 15 years, but those costs could then flip into savings, dropping by 2 percent through 2050. Related: Who Benefits Most From Cheap Oil?

Moreover, not only would scaling up wind have a negligible impact on electricity prices, but by reducing demand for natural gas to burn electricity, wind would lower natural gas prices, thereby creating big savings for uses of natural gas other than for electricity. Wind would save $280 billion through lower natural gas prices.

Another complaint about wind is that it can only be constructed in windy areas – in other words, the Great Plains. A band running from Texas to North Dakota is indeed the windiest section of the country, but the problem with that is that very few people live in wind-swept areas of South Dakota, Wyoming, or the panhandle of Texas, for example. But DOE finds that innovation in wind equipment – such as larger towers and blades that reduce the cost of generation – allow wind to spread well beyond these traditional windy areas. For example, increasing heights to 140 meters can allow wind to become viable across three times the amount of land space compared to 2008. Or, put more simply, wind can now be profitably built in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Minnesota, Virginia, North and South Carolina, and several more states. Related: Texas Town First Of Many To Switch To 100% Renewable Power

However, not all is rosy. Wind still faces stiff competition from natural gas as well as flat electricity demand. That is hurting investment and causing hesitation in the industry. Major improvements in technology, supply chain management, reliability, as well as a large build out in electric transmission capacity will be needed in order for wind to succeed over the long-term, conditions which are not guaranteed.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Todd on March 31 2015 said:
    Not only do windmills kill thousands of endangered birds each year, they also are an ugly eyesore. If these monstrosities were used to pump oil or gas, the left would be screaming "visual pollution"......
  • archaeopteryx on March 31 2015 said:
    There is only one argument to prove the 20% claim a bit bogus: The experience in Germany (or even better) Denmark. Denmark is loaded with windmills It may claim a nominal wind generation of about 25%, but upon review of their own figures it becomes obvious that such a percentage is feasible only because Denmark "dumps" their wind power onto Norway's hydro plants and imports either hydro power or nuclear power (from Sweden), or coal power from Germany. That is a "sell low - buy high" strategy that has led Denmark having the highest cost of electricity in Euroland. Denmark's green trick is only made possible from its small size relative to its neighbors and Norway's spare hydro capacity. Germany is doing the same in a much grander scale. It shows 7-8% nominal wind contribution but the fine print shows "exports" to French and Swiss hydro plants and unsolicited power exports to Poland and the Czech Republic. Germany has the second highest cost in Europe, in spite of coal and nuclear capacity. Will Canada play the role of Norway? Doubtful, it is not big enough, never mind willing. Wind is limited to a max 4-5-6% power substitution as demonstrated by EON as early as 2005. Unless if we like the looks and put them up for aesthetic purposes...

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News