• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 12 mins U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 1 hour Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 3 days US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 2 days EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 17 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 4 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 15 hours Owning stocks long-term low risk?
  • 1 hour Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 3 days A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 2 days The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 2 days 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 4 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 3 days Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
Alt Text

Electric Planes Could Soon Be A Reality

Fully electric aviation just got…

Alt Text

The Latest Challenger To Lithium-Ion Batteries

A new breakthrough in battery…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

What Renewable Projects Would you Purchase Electricity From if you Were a Power Utility

Renewables (and particularly geothermal) are becoming a more popular talking point amongst utilities and governments these days. Just this week, America's Geothermal Energy Association said it will tell utilities at an upcoming conference that geothermal power could create $22.5 billion in economic output in the state of Nevada alone.

Others in the southwest U.S. are taking notice of this trend. The Western Governors' Association (WGA) has been working for some time on its "Renewable Energy Transmission Roadmap". A study report aimed at helping renewable project developers in the western U.S. permit their power stations, and get them hooked up and producing power.

One of the major deliverables from the report is a list of factors utilities look at when deciding whether to purchase power from a renewable project.

As long-time geothermal investors know, power purchase agreements (PPAs) from utilities are a crucial component of any new project. Under a PPA, a utility agrees to buy a certain amount of power from a project for a certain number of years at a set price.

PPAs are a linchpin part of project development. Often, banks require a PPA before they will debt finance the construction of a power plant. Without an agreement, the facility may never get built.

So it's crucial to know what utilities look for when deciding who to sign PPAs with.

The recent WGA report suggests a handful of factors. Some are obvious, like power price and the use of proven technology.

But others are more subtle. And may make or break projects over the coming years.

One of the most interesting criteria is developer experience. WGA notes that utilities will likely give PPA priority to groups that have a demonstrated track record in project finance, engineering procurement and facility operation.

This of course makes sense. The last thing a utility wants is to spend time and money on assessing and issuing a PPA, only to see the project die on the operating table due to poor construction or operation.

The implications are intriguing. Groups with a long history of building power plants have a distinct advantage over upstart management teams. By holding greater sway with utilities, experienced groups may be able to get preferred access to PPAs. And thus get projects completed faster and cheaper.

This is one more reason for consolidation in the geothermal space. The value of experience could present an arbitrage, with projects worth more (on a risk-adjusted basis) in the hands of larger companies who have a greater likelihood of getting the job done.

If this advantage does become apparent, large firms will start buying these projects from smaller groups that have done the legwork to assemble the land, complete the exploration and prove technical feasibility. A win-win for all.

By. Dave Forest of Notela Resources


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on July 27 2010 said:
    Let me give the Swedish government some advice here. First, replace the two reactors that were dismantled with two new reactors of 1000MW each. Also, continue to maintain the output of hydropower. The nuclear and the hydro will almost certainly supply more than 95% of the desired electricity supply, and perhaps as much as 98%. In any event, where the amount not being supplied by nuclear and hydro is concerned, write the names of alternatives (e.g. wind, solar thermal, etc) on a chart, and throw a dart at this chart. Supply that 2 or 3 percent of remaining power from the first two alternatives hit by the dart. Do you get the message? Most of the alternatives are uneconomical, but voters want them anyway because they have been tricked into believing that they are economical. So give them their alternatives, but don't make a song and dance about it.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News