• 1 hour Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 3 hours Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 5 hours $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 6 hours Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 8 hours Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 10 hours Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 16 hours Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 21 hours Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 1 day Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 1 day Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 1 day Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 1 day Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 1 day Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 2 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 2 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 2 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 2 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 2 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 2 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 2 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 2 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 3 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 3 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 3 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 3 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 3 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 3 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 4 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 4 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 4 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 4 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 4 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 4 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
  • 4 days BP CEO Sees Venezuela As Oil’s Wildcard
  • 4 days Iran Denies Involvement In Bahrain Oil Pipeline Blast
  • 7 days The Oil Rig Drilling 10 Miles Under The Sea
  • 7 days Baghdad Agrees To Ship Kirkuk Oil To Iran
  • 7 days Another Group Joins Niger Delta Avengers’ Ceasefire Boycott
  • 7 days Italy Looks To Phase Out Coal-Fired Electricity By 2025
  • 7 days Kenya Set To Give Local Communities Greater Share Of Oil Revenues
Alt Text

Can Solar Survive Without Subsidies?

Despite falling solar panel costs…

What Renewable Projects Would you Purchase Electricity From if you Were a Power Utility

What Renewable Projects Would you Purchase Electricity From if you Were a Power Utility

Renewables (and particularly geothermal) are becoming a more popular talking point amongst utilities and governments these days. Just this week, America's Geothermal Energy Association said it will tell utilities at an upcoming conference that geothermal power could create $22.5 billion in economic output in the state of Nevada alone.

Others in the southwest U.S. are taking notice of this trend. The Western Governors' Association (WGA) has been working for some time on its "Renewable Energy Transmission Roadmap". A study report aimed at helping renewable project developers in the western U.S. permit their power stations, and get them hooked up and producing power.

One of the major deliverables from the report is a list of factors utilities look at when deciding whether to purchase power from a renewable project.

As long-time geothermal investors know, power purchase agreements (PPAs) from utilities are a crucial component of any new project. Under a PPA, a utility agrees to buy a certain amount of power from a project for a certain number of years at a set price.

PPAs are a linchpin part of project development. Often, banks require a PPA before they will debt finance the construction of a power plant. Without an agreement, the facility may never get built.

So it's crucial to know what utilities look for when deciding who to sign PPAs with.

The recent WGA report suggests a handful of factors. Some are obvious, like power price and the use of proven technology.

But others are more subtle. And may make or break projects over the coming years.

One of the most interesting criteria is developer experience. WGA notes that utilities will likely give PPA priority to groups that have a demonstrated track record in project finance, engineering procurement and facility operation.

This of course makes sense. The last thing a utility wants is to spend time and money on assessing and issuing a PPA, only to see the project die on the operating table due to poor construction or operation.

The implications are intriguing. Groups with a long history of building power plants have a distinct advantage over upstart management teams. By holding greater sway with utilities, experienced groups may be able to get preferred access to PPAs. And thus get projects completed faster and cheaper.

This is one more reason for consolidation in the geothermal space. The value of experience could present an arbitrage, with projects worth more (on a risk-adjusted basis) in the hands of larger companies who have a greater likelihood of getting the job done.

If this advantage does become apparent, large firms will start buying these projects from smaller groups that have done the legwork to assemble the land, complete the exploration and prove technical feasibility. A win-win for all.

By. Dave Forest of Notela Resources




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on July 27 2010 said:
    Let me give the Swedish government some advice here. First, replace the two reactors that were dismantled with two new reactors of 1000MW each. Also, continue to maintain the output of hydropower. The nuclear and the hydro will almost certainly supply more than 95% of the desired electricity supply, and perhaps as much as 98%. In any event, where the amount not being supplied by nuclear and hydro is concerned, write the names of alternatives (e.g. wind, solar thermal, etc) on a chart, and throw a dart at this chart. Supply that 2 or 3 percent of remaining power from the first two alternatives hit by the dart. Do you get the message? Most of the alternatives are uneconomical, but voters want them anyway because they have been tricked into believing that they are economical. So give them their alternatives, but don't make a song and dance about it.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News