• 6 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 10 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 15 minutes Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 3 mins U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 35 mins Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 8 hours Judge Approves SEC Settlement With Tesla, Musk
  • 7 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 2 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 2 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 5 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 7 hours Porsche Says That it ‘Enters the Electric Era With The New Taycan’
  • 3 hours China Thirsty for Canadian Crude
  • 6 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 9 hours Saudi Crown Prince to Trump: We've Replaced All Iran's Lost Oil
  • 9 hours Mexico State Oil
  • 7 hours Gold price on a rise...
Alt Text

The Overlooked Giant In Renewables

The IEA expects renewable energy…

Alt Text

New Breakthrough Could Slash Solar Prices To New Lows

Scientists believe they’ve found a…

Alt Text

IEA: Renewables Set For Explosive Growth

The IEA sees strong growth…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

This State Just Became The World's Greatest Renewables Market

This State Just Became The World's Greatest Renewables Market

Renewable energy developers, take note. There's a new spot on Earth leading the way for projects in solar, wind, and other sources of green power.

California.

That's because of a new bill, signed into law late last week in the state, mandating a massive buildout in renewable power capacity, in a very short time frame. Related: Shedding Some Light On U.S. Energy Consumption

The bill, S.B. 350, calls for California's utilities to move toward acquiring 50 percent of their electricity from renewable sources. And the state's power generators will have to work quickly -- they're required to achieve this renewables goal by 2030.

That gives utilities just 15 years to build up a substantial base of renewable energy. Currently, California generates about 25 peercent of its 18,400 gigawatt hours of electricity from renewables -- meaning the state will need to add about another 4,600 GWh of capacity in a decade and a half. Related: Energy Storage Just Got A Massive Vote Of Confidence

That will almost certainly mean California's utilities will be issuing calls for "power purchase agreements." Inviting owners of solar and wind (plus geothermal and maybe even run-of-river hydro) to submit their projects as potential suppliers to the state grid.

The new legislation also means utilities may be forced to pay premium prices to renewables suppliers -- in order to ensure these projects are economic, and able to stay in business long enough to meet the new 2030 goals. Related: LNG Bust Could Last For Years

Such purchase agreements are a key element in underpinning project finance for a wind farm or solar panel array. And with more power purchase agreements being handed out, project developers will have an easier time securing bank loans to build their facilities.

All of which adds up to a major opportunity for people holding the right projects. Watch for the results of coming power purchase calls to see who will be early beneficiaries from the new policy.

Here's to going clean and green,

Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • mulp on October 13 2015 said:
    As Trump would say "this will create so much capitalism, you will be screaming "no more capitalism!"

    The only way to produce 4-5 gigawatt hours of non-pillage energy is by paying workers to build a whole lot of solar and wind and battery capital assets, and then charging customers for harvesting the sun and wind with rates to pay for all the labor costs over time.
  • voiceofreason on October 14 2015 said:
    Surely not worse than "charging" the generations to come with dealing with an environmental catastrophe borne out of reckless use of fossil fuels at artificially low prices for decades?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News