• 5 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 8 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 12 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 14 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 28 mins Its going to be an oil bloodbath
  • 1 hour US Shale Resilience: Oil Industry Experts Say Shale Will Rise Again
  • 5 hours Trump will meet with executives in the energy industry to discuss the impact of COVID-19
  • 6 hours Marine based energy generation
  • 8 hours What If ‘We’d Adopted A More Conventional Response To This Epidemic?’
  • 19 hours The Most Annoying Person You Have Encountered During Lockdown
  • 22 hours Which producers will shut in first?
  • 16 hours Trafigura CEO Weir says, "We will see 30% to 35% drop in demand". That amounts to 35mm bbls/day glut ! OPEC+ 10 mm cut won't fix it. It's a DEMAND problem.
  • 10 hours Real Death Toll In CCP Virus May Be 12X Official Toll
  • 20 hours Cpt Lauren Dowsett
  • 4 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
  • 17 hours Today 127 new cases in US, 99 in China, 778 in Italy
  • 21 hours Washington doctor removed from his post, over covid

Breaking News:

IEA: OPEC Can’t Save The Oil Market

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Premium Content

This State Just Became The World's Greatest Renewables Market

Renewable energy developers, take note. There's a new spot on Earth leading the way for projects in solar, wind, and other sources of green power.

California.

That's because of a new bill, signed into law late last week in the state, mandating a massive buildout in renewable power capacity, in a very short time frame. Related: Shedding Some Light On U.S. Energy Consumption

The bill, S.B. 350, calls for California's utilities to move toward acquiring 50 percent of their electricity from renewable sources. And the state's power generators will have to work quickly -- they're required to achieve this renewables goal by 2030.

That gives utilities just 15 years to build up a substantial base of renewable energy. Currently, California generates about 25 peercent of its 18,400 gigawatt hours of electricity from renewables -- meaning the state will need to add about another 4,600 GWh of capacity in a decade and a half. Related: Energy Storage Just Got A Massive Vote Of Confidence

That will almost certainly mean California's utilities will be issuing calls for "power purchase agreements." Inviting owners of solar and wind (plus geothermal and maybe even run-of-river hydro) to submit their projects as potential suppliers to the state grid.

The new legislation also means utilities may be forced to pay premium prices to renewables suppliers -- in order to ensure these projects are economic, and able to stay in business long enough to meet the new 2030 goals. Related: LNG Bust Could Last For Years

Such purchase agreements are a key element in underpinning project finance for a wind farm or solar panel array. And with more power purchase agreements being handed out, project developers will have an easier time securing bank loans to build their facilities.

All of which adds up to a major opportunity for people holding the right projects. Watch for the results of coming power purchase calls to see who will be early beneficiaries from the new policy.

Here's to going clean and green,

Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage






Leave a comment
  • mulp on October 13 2015 said:
    As Trump would say "this will create so much capitalism, you will be screaming "no more capitalism!"

    The only way to produce 4-5 gigawatt hours of non-pillage energy is by paying workers to build a whole lot of solar and wind and battery capital assets, and then charging customers for harvesting the sun and wind with rates to pay for all the labor costs over time.
  • voiceofreason on October 14 2015 said:
    Surely not worse than "charging" the generations to come with dealing with an environmental catastrophe borne out of reckless use of fossil fuels at artificially low prices for decades?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News